Debunked: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG), 10kw out for 1kw in.

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
what is the quantum effect that is claimed to be generated?
erm. Dunno, it's not clear from these. Where the quantum field is mentioned it doesn't detail how, just that they use it.
(overview taken from peswiki page http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Quantum_Energy_Generator_(QEG)#How_It_Works)

The technology is based largely on the work done by Timothy Thrapp of WITTS, who derived it largely from the Ecklin-Brown Generator. All of these are derived from the work of Nikola Tesla's patent 511916 simply titled "Electric Generator".
...
Here is an excerpt from their campaign description (slightly edited):

About the Invention
The words 'quantum field' sound mysterious, but this is just another way to say 'smaller than atoms.' The energy source for the QEG is the same force that holds atoms together. In conventional electric current flow, the movement of electrons is what provides usable energy. With our machine, we also use conventional electron flow, but in addition, we are making use of the many other smaller particles which have been known by some energy pioneers since the early 1900’s -- people like Tesla, Moray, Schauberger, Riech and others.
In basic terms, our machine reverses the conventions used to build electric motors, i.e., instead of using low voltage/high current construction, which wastes energy, our designs use high voltage/low current construction, which gives us a HUGE surplus of energy. A portion of the surplus energy is fed back to self-power the motor, and the excess energy is collected in capacitors and converted into house current (120 or 240 volt, at 50-200 Amperes, depending on scaling). This is known as over-unity (more output than input), which traditional educational institutions have historically taught us was impossible. It is not at all impossible, and does NOT operate outside the laws of physics.
....
The machines get their input from the quantum field, which is estimated to have in the neighborhood of 200 Megawatts of power available in every cubic foot of space. That is an amazing level of energy density which has always been available to us, but the powers that be (or were) have historically suppressed the people and concepts that have tried to bring it into the mainstream economy.

....
In his interview with Sterling, James said:

It's an electrical generator. The principles it works on are very unconventional. There is nothing I know if in mainstream engineering, motor and generator that works this way.
It's definitely a resonance machine. It's really quite unique. There are No magnets, no copper windings on the rotor, no commutator, no slip rings.
It works on the principle of what they used to call a multi-vibrator.
The main oscillator is a tank circuit. The rotor causes the inductance to go up and down at same rate as the rpm of the rotor. This creates small voltage in primary coil; which, as soon as it starts to build up, it goes into resonance and beings to generate high voltage pulses. The high voltage pulses are transformed into low voltage, high current output pulses.
It's a transformer and it also works on mechanical resonance, which is a result of an electrical resonance. So it's actually mechanical motion that creates the high voltage pulses; then, from that point, it's more of a conventional transformer action. So the initial, very large inductance that gets excited by the mechanical motion of the rotor; and once that excitation begins, the voltage goes up very rapidly into the kilovolt range, and those large kV pulses drive the output.

Elsewhere was written:

This generator does not run at 60/50 hz. It runs at 400 hz. As for start up, James says that the HV coil or primary coil is about 40 henries, that is a very long wire. When the rotor passes by the it changes the inductance to about 30 henries. That swing in inductance is enough to generate a voltage that will increase until resonance is achieved. The the primary will start oscillating at 400 hz and then it works as a transformer converting 25000 volts at 400 hz to 240 volts at 400 hz.
Content from External Source
Edit, found some discussion on their forum.

In the QEG, the exciter coil is used to provide a conduction path through the quantum field (zero point) into the generator core. This has the effect of polarizing the core, which increases power output over time.
...

The QEG, as stated, accesses the "Quantum field." It uses a system of "targeting" the quantum field by introducing a "vibration" in the load side of the generator circuit at ~ 1.332 Mhz by my calculations. This vibration then travels backwards of the EM power back to the Source of the energy, loading it with a pulsed rate modulation.

Our goal in the "turn up" / "tune up" process is to transfer the impedance or load, to the Quantum level and have it respond with power of correction coming back out...taking the load off the motor to some degree.


The original Source of the energy is the motor, and as dragging energy reaches the motor as loading, we would normally build some sort of sensing circuit to sense it and then adjust the motor voltage to adjust it's speed for the load, and keep the motor at one RPM. We would call that a "governor" in electrical system speak.

However in the QEG the vibration frequency mixes and targets the atoms of the copper and or iron, taping the mass energy of motion of the Quantum field that is responsible for all natural motion in the universe, including the iron and copper atoms spin gyrations. Atoms are self powered and self recovering as seen in QED physics study as well as NMR study, as are solar systems and galaxies.

If we hit the Quantum level with the targeting frequency, and then get a response by having a positive attitude [expect it to connect], the Quantum field will take the load and begin to self regulate it, as atoms do.

This goal cannot be achieved if your attitude is one of .... "skepticism." The quantum realm does not work that way. Healers in general have a knowledge of how the quantum realm operates, and responds, providing what we expect, and using intention to accomplish. We have to clear and clean our emotions and minds in order to successfully heal.....
http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-general-topics/272-how-or-why-does-the-qeg-work
Content from External Source
 

wotgorilla

Member
erm. Dunno, it's not clear from these. Where the quantum field is mentioned it doesn't detail how, just that they use it.


About the only thing that I'm in agreement with the proponents of this device is the implication that all that can be known about electronics already is, when employed by some of it's detractors. I've run head on into the irrationally of skeptics. They are not immune.
There's apparently variations of the QEG, but nothing that alters the circuit function. This one is representative, and labeled metabunk, perhaps it appears elsewhere. But, I haven't seen an analysis of this circuit here. So although my electronics forte is not in motors, I think I can give a reasonably accurate basic review.
To the left you will see an isolated vari-ac feeding a rectifier which supplies a voltage controlled DC motor. This allows the generator to be driven at the rpm required to achieve the frequency of resonance of the self excited tank circuit shown in green.




To be as concise as possible, I'm going to forgo it's explanation. But, it can be read here.

http://avstop.com/ac/apgeneral/alternators.html

Below we have the schematic of a Ac induction motor.



Upon comparing the three images above, it becomes clear that the QEG is simply a two pole induction motor used as an asynchronous generator. Nothing terribly unique about this, the facility isn't a secret. An alternator is just a more efficient device.

So, the self exciter tank circuit. A real world device. The principle is that once oscillation is induced by the rotating stator, it will continue, due to being enclosed in a 100% feedback loop. From the description given by the QEG supporters, it seems clear that the hope is that once the proper rpm is achieved, the tank circuit will take over driving the rotor, which in turn will induce voltages into the stator windings. Bada-bing, free energy.

Theoretically, the tank circuit would continue to oscillate indefinitely if there was such a thing as a pure capacitor or inductor. No such devices exist. Caps have inductance and resistance, inductors have capacitance and resistance. Same with the wiring that has all three. The energy would be dissipated very quickly. But, even if such devices could be realized, the circuit would only function until it's energy is depleted by driving the stator.

Now, let's get into resonance, one of the supposed band aides used to overcome the above problems. Broadly brushed, it's the property of a system in which the transmission of energy is at it's greatest efficiency, i.e. lowest loss. Very handy in electronics for a variety of applications. In fact, we can output a voltage of higher amplitude then that input, by tuning for a high Q. What free energy proponents often don't grasp, is all we've done is peak the release of energy, by trading amplitude for time. The area under the curve is the same.

Despite whatever they chose to call the little red box in the center of the drawing, it's a tank circuit filter operating as a bandpass. In other words, it passes the tuned frequency with the least amount of loss, and attenuates all others. Not clear as to the function of the spark gap. It might be used as a protection device.

So, what could be happening here is that the circuit could be outputting spikes of higher amplitude then 120 volts that are of the same rms value. That would account for the claims. The problem with the quantum
mechanics explanation is that there's nothing here that's new, or hasn't been done before in circuit implementation. Application, maybe. But, electrons don't know the difference. The components are the same as used elsewhere, no special materials. Nothing to compensate for all the heat losses.

I don't see how it could work. Remove the power, and it will coast to a stop. If under load, quickly.
I'd like the chance to measure one, for grins. But, I doubt that will ever happen. I almost did once. But they found out about my background, and wouldn't let me near it.
 

Efftup

Senior Member.
so it definitely sounds like a total load of woo then.

Especially the "it won't work if you don;t believe in it" nonsense. The sort of healers who were just randomly bandying the word vibrations about and have only in the last few years started to jump on the Quantum bandwagon have a knowledge of how the quantum realm operates. Sounds to me on a par with "yes I can feel someone hanging around the astral plane, I have a John? or James who wishes to communicate. "
 

Free Energy Now

Closed Account
PLEASE, Allow me a moment to blow your mind.

Over Unity! Wait this is not possible, the law of conservation and the second law of thermodynamics are clear. The stated definition "In physics, a conservation law states that a particular measurable property of an isolated physical system does not change as the system evolves." & "The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, a state with maximum entropy." Here is the definition as I see it. In any closed system of energy, all useable energy will be transformed into unusable energy in any conventional sense as we know it now.

BUT WAIT! PHYSICS HAS IT ALL WORNG! THATS RIGHT WRONG!

In our universe there is no such thing as a closed system, unless of course you speak of the universe as a whole, which may or may not be closed by nature either (Debatable). We cannot ever know that for sure.

If anyone that doubts the idea that a machine created can produce more energy, useable by us, than it consumes is both myopic in their thinking and need to take a bit more time study and take their minds our of their butts.

Any machine that produces more energy than it consumes is simply "borrowing" energy from a larger system. (NO CLOSED SYSTEMS). The conversion of one form of energy into a useable form is what most machines are based on. BUT WAIT KIDS. Allow me to take a moment and blow your minds! Is that converted energy after use unusable? Can is converted back into another form of energy and is useable again? GEE, let me take a moment to think, MOST LIKELY!

The first law of thermodynamics says that energy can neither be created or destroyed. HMMM, from what this is saying energy simply converts itself into other forms of its self. Just because we burned a fossil fuel to make one form of energy does not mean that after we use it it cannot be converted back into useable energy again and again. I would venture to say we need people who are closed minded, such as yourself, to start thinking about that rather than dismissing all possibilities of the "over-unity" and then moving on with the rest of your life thinking that because you dismissed it and told everyone around me to dismiss it that you have accomplish anything. YOU ARE A FOOL! Starting thinking about the problem for a change instead of holding those who are thinking about the problem back.

FOR example, The earth's rotation takes its energy form the suns angular momentum and rotation. The suns rotation takes its energy from the systems outside of it, and so on and so forth. This same principle follows through with every form of energy (matter).

IF, any machine were to produce more usable "energy" then is consumed it is simply "borrowing" that from the larger system that is unseen and possibly undetectable by modern devices, around it. This will not always be the case humanity may have already or will soon produce such devices to detect even the forms of energy we currently cannot measure.

FOR EXAMPLE, It is conceivable that a machine would borrow from the heat energy around it or the electromagnetism of the planet, or another system of "energy" around it.

That is what Nicolai Tesla was doing in his inventions. He did not produce energy from nothing, which is impossible, he simply built open systems that borrowed unseen energy from energy around the machine and made it usable to us in a form we could "plug" into.

DONT YOU GET IT! THINK PEOPLE THINK!
QUIT saying Over Unity is not possible. THAT IS! You are simply myopic in your thinking and you need to change that thinking NOW. Over unity is more than possible and there have been many throughout the ages of humanity that have discovered it and were SQUASHED by people such as yourselves who have no mind to think and will not take the time to study in order to change that thinking, but rather rely on the "experts" around you to do that "thinking" for you. Unless of course you are calling yourself the "expert". Then shame on you!

Science on countless occasions throughout human history has deemed to define the reality around us only to find out, "We were wrong". But the funny thing is that at the time the "beliefs" were held, they were dogmatic about them. Most of science is religion and much of it has yet to define the reality around us properly. Look it is also prideful for any "Scientist" to say we know this as a fact! The only facts are ones that can adhere to the scientific method. For example science says it is fact that gravity exists because it can be observed in a scientific method. BUT WAIT KIDS! This is not necessarily fact. Could their be a place in the universe that gravity does not act the same it is does here? Could I produce an environment where gravity does not operate at all? So in the case of gravity, the fact of it can only be stated in for far as we have observed it so far.

So in order to adhere to your posting guidelines lets talk about this specific example of a machine which claims overunity (produces more usable energy that it consumes). The idea of a smaller power generator would power a larger one. But unless this machine barrows energy from an outside system or converts other forms of unseen energy from around it and make us it able in a "plug able" sense. then the machine is bogus. From what has been observed in at least four occasions, so far, this the phenomenon of unity. In one instance over unity. I would not take the time to spout your opinions about it until you personally have tried it or have spoken to the people that have and heard a first hand account of what happened. I have not done this so I reserve judgement. Instead of saying quip remarks like, OVER UNITY IS IMPOSSIBLE, therefore this is a shame! Is myopic! It would be wiser to state, We will see what happens. The funny thing about lies are that they always some out, more matter how hard someone tries to hide them. So if this is a lie then you can say in this case only over unity was not possible.

If you would like to contact me please contact me through my email metabunkorg {[at]} mikelong {[dot]} org.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
If anyone that doubts the idea that a machine created can produce more energy, useable by us, than it consumes is both myopic in their thinking and need to take a bit more time study and take their minds our of their butts.
All anyone has to do is demonstrate it. No-one ever has.
Over unity is more than possible and there have been many throughout the ages of humanity that have discovered it and were SQUASHED by people such as yourselves who have no mind to think and will not take the time to study in order to change that thinking, but rather rely on the "experts" around you to do that "thinking" for you. Unless of course you are calling yourself the "expert". Then shame on you!
Really? Being skeptical of the claim somehow so crushed their spirit they were unable to show the principle in operation?
It would be wiser to state, We will see what happens.
How long should we wait, and how long do they get to make excuses before it's fair to say they were lying or mistaken?
They are now on their THIRD machine, yet still have not produced overunity, apparently because people wanting them to prove it properly makes too many bad vibes for the machine to work. They clearly stated in their funding requests, back in Septemeber of last year, that they had and could deliver overunity machines to the world. They haven't. It's fraud.
If overunity is possible, this particular project isn't a demonstration of it.
 
Last edited:

Efftup

Senior Member.
That was a very long and unhelpful rant. In what way is anyone here holding you back? you don;t have to come and read our poo poohing of your brilliant machines. You can carry on and show that it works and make us all look stupid. nothing I or anyone else says here has any relevance to your machine EXCEPT when we stop gullible people sending you money for plans for a machine that has not been proven to work, and that you will charge money for supposedly trying to help them with what they "did wrong" building it.

On this site are many seasoned debunkers. That does not mean we are closed minded and automatically naysay anything new and novel or always insist the "official story" is correct, we just show where stuff is clearly not true or has been misrepresented.

IF your Over Unity (perpetual motion) machine worked as described, you could start it off with a little power and it would then generate power to run itself and excess power to do work. This means it could run definitely, until parts wore out and needed replacing.
So why haven't you done that?

Here's an idea. You can get a 2TB hard drive in the UK for about £80. a cheap webcam for about £5-8, and you can download free recording software such as Contacam or Eyespy.

You can start the machine up and then show you are removing all external power from the system. You can leave the machine running and just keep filming it constantly. a 2TB hard drive will record a single camera for at least 3 months. The software will chop it up into hour long chunks.
That's a good way to help show that your machine works as described.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
QUIT saying Over Unity is not possible.

Nobody said that. But perhaps you might consider a different name, like "Energy Tap" - to clarify things.

People here are just calling it like they see it. It looks like it won't work, there's no evidence that it does work, and the expensive consulting fees make it look like a con.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I've allowed FEN's original long post to stand. I know it has a lot of points in it, but please don't take them up in this thread unless they directly related to the QED machine.
 

David Coulter

Senior Member.
As I am sitting on the beach in Corsica this week I see a lot of energy from non-closed systems: wind, waves, and sun. But this QEG device does not have any way of capturing all of the energies in these. A generator with some capacitors attached IS a closed system.
 

qed

Senior Member
This thread reminded my of the currently purely theoretical notion of a quantum battery (2012).

With quantum batteries, the ultimate goal is to get out what you put in!

Clearly these scientists (and their reviewers) did not read the "papers" on "QEG".
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
No, they'd do better with solar roofing on the houses. The opinion of other experimenters who look critically at the design and results is that this is a poor and less efficient generator than conventional ones.
(apparently it's a kind of 'variable reluctance' generator and not much more)
 

vooke

Active Member
Slightly OT but I was kicked out of another forum for demanding for evidence. Banned for being argumentative,divisive and so forth. I for once asked a member to share with me his strongest proof of faked moon landing since all existing evidence have been comprehensively debunked. They insisted some had not. So I asked for this.

What I mean to say is you have no idea how it infuriates bunk believers. I think demanding for evidence before accepting claims is the least you can do short of blind faith. Why are they churning out videos of 'evidence' yet they don't brook questions....polite inquiry that is?

It is all bunk
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
No, they'd do better with solar roofing on the houses. The opinion of other experimenters who look critically at the design and results is that this is a poor and less efficient generator than conventional ones.
(apparently it's a kind of 'variable reluctance' generator and not much more)

I think "do better" is rather an understatement. Solar roofing would be a vast improvement. They would do better with nothing at all. They would do better just throwing energy away.

It's a generator of electricity that is powered by electricity. It looks like less than half the electric that goes in one end comes out the other. The rest is dissipated as heat energy.
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
Quantum Energy is a great concept...I really look forward to the day when we (as a species) can actually learn to "tap into" what exists in Nature.

Give us some time....we will figure it out....but meanwhile, there will be "pretenders" along the way.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
does it even make a good room heater?

Well, if there were actually putting in 1Kw, as they suggest, then they are just getting out 1Kw of heat. The motor and the generator will both move air around. Most of the heat (I suspect) will be given off by the motor and the light bulbs - but it will be getting warm all along the way.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It has now been two months since the events in the OP ("achieving resonance"). While they claim to have achieve "overunity", they seem to simply be measuring the wrong thing. They have had two months to get the machine to power itself (something which should be trivial - just a voltage regulator) but of course they have done nothing.

Instead HopeGirl is simply planning another build, and soliciting donations again:

http://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/uk-qeg-coming-soon/


And again we have "resonance", but no self powering:


Updated posted by Hope Moore 5 days ago

We did it again!! UK QEG HAS RESONANCE! This just in... assembly has just been completed, and the first phase of resonance has been reached. The next step is tuning to bring it to over unity, then we will achieve self running, as indicated by our simulation testing environment. Its almost time folks! We are unstoppable! Thank you so much to all of humanity who have supported Fix the World and the Engineers that are working so hard to bring free energy to all of us and liberate the planet.

Content from External Source


 

vooke

Active Member
Mick,
You'll get yourself shot
This is serious business
Serious $$$:mad:

Am starting to get pissed by their uncreativity; it's always "we're just about to" year in, year out
 

Teresa T

New Member
Go back to posts 18-20. It's easy to make fun of garage inventors, a bit tougher to take on a professional business and qualified engineer. Anybody going to take him up on his challenge to debunk his device? No takers?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Go back to posts 18-20. It's easy to make fun of garage inventors, a bit tougher to take on a professional business and qualified engineer. Anybody going to take him up on his challenge to debunk his device? No takers?

The lack of an independently verified demonstration is all the debunking that is needed. If it worked, then he could demonstrate it powering itself. He has not done so, hence there is no reason to go further.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Go back to posts 18-20. It's easy to make fun of garage inventors, a bit tougher to take on a professional business and qualified engineer. Anybody going to take him up on his challenge to debunk his device? No takers?
Quantamagnetics?
There's lots of people with builds - no one's claimed anything miraculous about it yet. If it was something, it would be causing some sensation in the forums.


quanta magnetics Q2
Sorry if this is the wrong place... but has anyone bought a Q2 Kit from Quanta Magnetics, I have... and have few questions and never got any response from these people... I am wondering if it works at all...

Thanks.
___________________

You just lost your money on an expensive scam.

I've seen those videos from that company and they're fraudulent.

One video he shows hooking up a battery, running the machine, removing the battery and it runs on caps.
He is making it look like the caps just got charged up but they were obviously ALREADY charged up. He doesn't
show the voltage of the caps before it starts running to show you they're already charged.
_____________________
...
beside the fact that after paying 3K, you have to buy 12 N52 magnets, about 1500 USD and the Capacitors, another 1000 USD, this kid is designed for the very few, that want t risk money, as it is very expensive and you dont know if it works as in the video...

For the Forum, they have 0 "Zero" support, that is why I am telling you you better know what you are doing, so you can make sense of the video on youtube and the 5 photos that come with the Kit....

About the documentation, I really don't think is right to give it away, but I can answer questions and stir you on the right way, but believe me, there is NOT much...

http://www.overunity.com/3842/muller.../#.UX63YYJNpsg here it very much the same device replicated, hope this helps

It have taken me several weeks going over and over the 5 pages, to understand many things that they do not tell you how, or the operation of the Q2. Which I will not know if I did it right till I do some test...

But because the lack of support and everything else, will make people share and share, they are not being smart...
http://www.energyscienceforum.com/showthread.php?t=812
Content from External Source
If you 're really interested in it, then perhaps you can start a new thread on it, with the best evidence it has.
 

Jason

Senior Member
The lack of an independently verified demonstration is all the debunking that is needed. If it worked, then he could demonstrate it powering itself. He has not done so, hence there is no reason to go further.
Just out of curiosity, if someone did invent this and was able to get it to work, what would be the proper procedure for showing it to the world. Would they create a YT video and put in on the net, knowing people could steal their invention or would they have to file patents first, or do something to protect themselves. Is seems to me, they would probably want to protect their invention and thats why its hard to take these videos seriously...
 

Hevach

Senior Member.
There are a few "proper" ways. The traditional one is a peer reviewed journal, but for marketable inventions direct marketing to investors or manufacturers is common. Selling it yourself is fine itself, but there's the distinction of selling a working product and selling perpetual help to get it working.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
There are a few "proper" ways. The traditional one is a peer reviewed journal, but for marketable inventions direct marketing to investors or manufacturers is common. Selling it yourself is fine itself, but there's the distinction of selling a working product and selling perpetual help to get it working.

I think it's amusing just how ordinary the discussion regarding this supposed technology are. Like the Morocco build was just to power a well, and here we are talking about patenting thing.

If such technology worked, it would be a pivotal point in humankind's existence. Just take the Nobel prize ($1 million), and the eternal fame, and the undying gratitude of future generations.

Instead people are just nickle and diming excuses, and bickering on web pages.

Either it works or it doesn't. If it works then demonstrate it. That's all there is to it.
 

Jason

Senior Member
I think it's amusing just how ordinary the discussion regarding this supposed technology are. Like the Morocco build was just to power a well, and here we are talking about patenting thing.

If such technology worked, it would be a pivotal point in humankind's existence. Just take the Nobel prize ($1 million), and the eternal fame, and the undying gratitude of future generations.

Instead people are just nickle and diming excuses, and bickering on web pages.

Either it works or it doesn't. If it works then demonstrate it. That's all there is to it.
Maybe I proposed the question the wrong way. If it worked, how would you demonstrate it. You wouldn't demonstrate it on YT, because it could be stolen, or are you saying it wouldn't matter since you would still be recognized for its invention and win 1 million dollars. Honestly, an invention like that would be worth a hell of a lot more money than what 1 million.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Maybe I proposed the question the wrong way. If it worked, how would you demonstrate it. You wouldn't demonstrate it on YT, because it could be stolen, or are you saying it wouldn't matter since you would still be recognized for its invention and win 1 million dollars. Honestly, an invention like that would be worth a hell of a lot more money than what 1 million.

Sure, it would be worth billions, but none of the people making it claim to want billions, they say they want it for the betterment of mankind, to break the grip of big oil. So just patent it (or not, if you are really altruistic), and then demonstrate it.
 

Hevach

Senior Member.
Probably the best way to demonstrate that it really works is peer review. Patent it or don't (patents can also be put under an open public license), depending on how much control you want, then provide working units to researchers and professors in the field. Those people will not just demonstrate it, but do things like duplicate, disassemble, and intensionally break it to find any possible scam.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Probably the best way to demonstrate that it really works is peer review. Patent it or don't (patents can also be put under an open public license), depending on how much control you want, then provide working units to researchers and professors in the field. Those people will not just demonstrate it, but do things like duplicate, disassemble, and intensionally break it to find any possible scam.

A very good first start would be to simply show it running self powered. There is no reason at all why this should be difficult, assuming it actually works.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
FTW just keeps on going, now has a "self running" target for the UK of the end of July
Because we were working long days and into the early morning hours, most of the days we were not reporting as much, as we went along hoping to find that 'holy grail' loopback of the motor for self-running. Evens and I were only scheduled to be in the UK until the morning of the 20th but Phillip & his China partners agreed to buy us a new ticket so we could stay until this past Monday morning, and we thank them very much for this.

Tesla brought us the technology through his work and patents. When we can understand what he brought us and what he really knew we will progress in leaps and bounds. We are not there yet but we have the minds here in this group to grasp all that is necessary to move forward and uncover all the overunity secrets. This will take a LOT more research, understanding and sharing of our finding to do this. I am now committing myself in the days to come to contact each and every one in our research group personally, and see what each of us can individually research in various areas and then bring it all together into a unified whole."
Due to being away from homefront responsibilities for three months (while teaching so many engineers in other countries how to build a QEG), the Lead Engineer James had to return to the U.S. Work will resume on Monday July 7th in the original Pennsylvania location, to achieve self-running, and a target/goal date of the end of the month.
Content from External Source
 

Jason

Senior Member
FTW just keeps on going, now has a "self running" target for the UK of the end of July
Because we were working long days and into the early morning hours, most of the days we were not reporting as much, as we went along hoping to find that 'holy grail' loopback of the motor for self-running. Evens and I were only scheduled to be in the UK until the morning of the 20th but Phillip & his China partners agreed to buy us a new ticket so we could stay until this past Monday morning, and we thank them very much for this.

Tesla brought us the technology through his work and patents. When we can understand what he brought us and what he really knew we will progress in leaps and bounds. We are not there yet but we have the minds here in this group to grasp all that is necessary to move forward and uncover all the overunity secrets. This will take a LOT more research, understanding and sharing of our finding to do this. I am now committing myself in the days to come to contact each and every one in our research group personally, and see what each of us can individually research in various areas and then bring it all together into a unified whole."
Due to being away from homefront responsibilities for three months (while teaching so many engineers in other countries how to build a QEG), the Lead Engineer James had to return to the U.S. Work will resume on Monday July 7th in the original Pennsylvania location, to achieve self-running, and a target/goal date of the end of the month.
Content from External Source
So do you think this QEG and Hope Girl or Hope More are just a bunch of scammers trying to raise money and take advantage of people, or do you think they honestly believe they will be able to achieve their goal.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Well they're not open to criticism and censor questions. There's nothing new or innovative about the principle they're using, so them achieving the goal is really unlikely if not outright impossible.

There's probably enough wiggle room for them to claim they never technically promised it would work and it was an experiment all along.

At best they were naive about the realities of the generator, got excited about measurements that were premature and poorly done, and are now learning it's not as easy as they thought. Now they're going to disappear into an anticlimactic 'research' phase.

If their expert did actually have the expertise claimed, then it would have definitely been a knowing fraud. Or they've misrepresented his knowledge and credentials and he's only guilty of some earnest incompetence.

At worst they knew exactly how they could stay just ahead of failure-to-deliver and figured the pay-off was worth it.
 

Balance

Senior Member.

michelle

New Member
I have a lot of engineer friends working on the QEG project. they raise money to build these QEG generators that they believe work. I would suggest that the only real way to prove or disprove the possibility of these machines is to build a generator and see if it works.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
But they have been built, in 4 different countries, and they don't work, except as very inefficient generators.
They've now gone into an indefinite research phase last I'd heard, a year after they launched the claim of being able to provide working over-unity generators, and the funding campaign.
You can't just keep saying to give them time, they've failed to deliver.
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
I have a lot of engineer friends working on the QEG project. they raise money to build these QEG generators that they believe work.

Just out of curiosity, have any of your engineer friends built one? Or, are they still raising money for their project....to build one.

I ask in all sincerity....because, as a layperson, I still think that there 'might' be available sources of energy, yet to be tapped.

Think about a few centuries ago....electricity was not known then....as a power source.
 

michelle

New Member
I know the people working on this project and they are doing so with pure intentions. as with any attempt to do something with minimal funding and at this magnitude they are running into some problems. if you have feedback or suggestions I would contact those involved. folks here have great expertise and potential feedback. Instead of debunking the project, why not contribute your knowledge to making it happen?
 

michelle

New Member
they have built them, but they're running into some difficulties getting them to sustain. I don't know a lot about what's going on with it, but I can put you in contact with some of the main people working on the projects if you have questions.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
These guys are experts in hobby and over-unity electronic experiments.
http://www.overunity.com/14443/quantum-energy-generator-qeg-open-sourced-by-hopegirl/2490/
One of them made a mini-qeg that exactly replicates the results of the qeg, for a fraction of the cost. It's nothing miraculous.
If your friends want help with the project ask them.

The people behind FTW may possibly have pure intentions (though that is really stretching credibility at this point), but they doesn't mean they actually know what they're talking about.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: First object teleported to Earth's orbit [Quantum Communication] Science and Pseudoscience 11
Oystein Debunked: Gibraltar cancels Christmas Coronavirus COVID-19 5
Mythic Suns [Debunked] Viral internet meme indirectly claiming that Greenland has already fully melted. Science and Pseudoscience 6
T AiG Debunked: Fossils Fail to Find Major Transition From Dinosaurs to Birds Science and Pseudoscience 10
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 7
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 67
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition Explosion Before Collapse of South Tower 9/11 8
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosion in South Tower Lobby 9/11 7
Marc Powell Debunked: Mysterious Explosion Before the Flight 11 Crash 9/11 48
J.d.K Debunked: Marx: "The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way... They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust" Quotes Debunked 0
dimebag2 Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 74
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 9
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 76
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 9
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top