I think the headline here should be that this new paper seems to prove the null hypotheses. As it says
A Bruehl-style calendar-day comparison gives
a descriptive post-test asymmetry (RR = 1.35, 95%
CI [0.91, 2.00]), but that statistic is tied...
I recall there being a comment in the initial nuclear-association paper that the authors blindly chose the +/- 1 day date range to register their target ahead of running the numbers, presumably to avoid p-hacking -- picking data after the fact to...
I have a question concerning section 3.4., Temporal Correlation with Nuclear Tests (page 4 of paper and PDF), apologies in advance if it is naïve or a non-issue for you guys who have been following this subject:
The baseline rate—days more than...
The stars are fine. The satellite is just a bit off.
It's because it's a manually created TLE, made from visual observations. Based on that, the angular difference is perfectly acceptable.
I think the headline here should be that this new paper seems to prove the null hypotheses. As it says
A Bruehl-style calendar-day comparison gives
a descriptive post-test asymmetry (RR = 1.35, 95%
CI [0.91, 2.00]), but that statistic is tied...
I think the headline here should be that this new paper seems to prove the null hypotheses. As it says
A Bruehl-style calendar-day comparison gives
a descriptive post-test asymmetry (RR = 1.35, 95%
CI [0.91, 2.00]), but that statistic is tied...
Fixed! (2.44.6)
Also, ICYMI, there's now a "Satellte Mode" under the Camera Menu that works a lot better when pointing the camera more straight up or down.
Also, fixed that annoying judder when panning rotated camera.