Debunked: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG), 10kw out for 1kw in.

Pete Tar

Senior Member
Does anyone know the provenance?
Based on Tesla designs, so it has immediate market appeal. I'm pretty sure the original made no claims to do anything miraculous though.*

WITTS, Timothy Thrapp was running the same 'resonance generator' concept before FTW took it up.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:World_Improvement_Through_The_Spirit_Ministries



*edit - although reading some descriptions of his inventions, maybe he did imply a possible free-energy miracle
 
Last edited:

Patrick J. Kelly

Banned
Banned
I am always reluctant to say that any device does not work. Even with a replication which fails to work, the most that can honestly be said is that and attempted replication was not successful. I was passed a copy of the QEG documentation within 24 hours of it being released, along with the suggestion that I should publish it. However, there are many reason why that is not going to happen.

Due to the previous experiences of several people, I believe WITTS to be a group of con artists and in my opinion, this QEG disclosure is just not believable. Obviously, I would be delighted to be proved wrong, but the repeated insistence that the device must be assembled by a professional "Electromechanical Engineer" combined with the insistence that extreme constructional accuracy is needed and so the components should be bought from their designated suppliers, and the added fact that they request donations to WITTS, convinces me that the whole thing is a money-making scam, quite possibly intended to damage the credibility of the free-energy movement as a whole. The claims of the document 'going viral' come from the originators of the document and are even more dubious than the document itself.

I am assured by a specialist, that the supposed link with Nikola Tesla is completely spurious as it is not relevant. The notion of adapting a linear device to a circular device almost never works in practice, which raises a large question mark over their statement. The wire specification is highly suspicious to say the least. They call for AWG #10 which has a current rating of 15 amps. There are two equal windings. I don't think that the windings are in parallel but let's say that they are, making the maximum sustained current for that wire to be 30 amps. Ignoring the extra current flow needed for the device to be self-powered, the claimed output of 10 kilowatts requires a current of 47 amps at 220V or 94 amps at 110V, either of which would fry the wiring to destruction in a minute or two if conventional electricity is flowing through the wire. If it is cold electricity, then only tiny diameter wire would be needed and certainly not AWG #10.

Finally, their claim that the winding has to be done by a professional company appears to set the plans solidly outside the scope of the home builder, contrary to their general claim that this is a design that anyone anywhere in the world can build, and so, all in all, sadly, the QEG document has every appearance of being a crude scam.
 

David Coulter

Senior Member
I am always reluctant to say that any device does not work. Even with a replication which fails to work, the most that can honestly be said is that and attempted replication was not successful.
But the entire concept violates the laws of physics in this universe (conservation of energy). Every attempt at building a perpetual motion machine (or overunity generator) will fail, regardless of the skill of the mechanic.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I'm not understanding what vars is specifically but according to wiki... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volt-ampere_reactive

Yeah, I'm not too clear myself. But I think this is something that extends to the Moroccan builders - they are calculating reactive power, not real power. Real power (watts) is the only important measurement. How many watts are going in? How many are coming out.

And describing it as "imaginary" is not to say it does not exist - I think that more describes its trigonometric relationship to apparent power and real power (aka effective power). Apparent power is expressed as a complex number with a real and imaginary part.
 

Patrick J. Kelly

Banned
Banned
But the entire concept violates the laws of physics in this universe (conservation of energy). Every attempt at building a perpetual motion machine (or overunity generator) will fail, regardless of the skill of the mechanic.
Hi David,

Genuine science has been heavily suppressed for around a hundred years now. The so-called "Law of Conservation of Energy" applies only to "closed systems" and there are none of those in this universe as everywhere is subject to gravity, heat, electromagnetic radiation, cosmic particles, .... Using that kind of analysis system with its flawed assumptions, will analyse the functioning of a sailboat and happily ignore the fact that the same wind can power a thousand other sailboats in addition to the one which you are attempting to analyse. I personally, have proved that free-energy exists, and that was done with very simple equipment made in an evening. Laboratory tests have shown efficiencies well in excess of 1000% on a whole range of different designs. It is perfectly possible to run a standard, unmodified petrol generator with water as the only visible fuel, self-powering and providing kilowatts of excess energy and those have been used for years in off-grid locations. There are so many different methods of gaining free-energy that it really is not possible to discuss them here, so I invite you to visit my web site www.free-energy-info.com where there is a free ebook download of some 2600 pages giving the run-down on more than a hundred of these systems, with enough information for you to build them for yourself. Please remember that here we are just commenting on the QEG system and not free-energy as a whole.

Patrick
 

NoParty

Senior Member
Hi David,

Genuine science has been heavily suppressed for around a hundred years now. The so-called "Law of Conservation of Energy" applies only to "closed systems" and there are none of those in this universe as everywhere is subject to gravity, heat, electromagnetic radiation, cosmic particles, .... Using that kind of analysis system with its flawed assumptions, will analyse the functioning of a sailboat and happily ignore the fact that the same wind can power a thousand other sailboats in addition to the one which you are attempting to analyse. I personally, have proved that free-energy exists, and that was done with very simple equipment made in an evening. Laboratory tests have shown efficiencies well in excess of 1000% on a whole range of different designs. It is perfectly possible to run a standard, unmodified petrol generator with water as the only visible fuel, self-powering and providing kilowatts of excess energy and those have been used for years in off-grid locations. There are so many different methods of gaining free-energy that it really is not possible to discuss them here, so I invite you to visit my web site www.free-energy-info.com where there is a free ebook download of some 2600 pages giving the run-down on more than a hundred of these systems, with enough information for you to build them for yourself. Please remember that here we are just commenting on the QEG system and not free-energy as a whole.

Patrick
No offense intended...but if i directed you to a 20,000 page library of my rock-solid evidence of unicorns, wouldn't you just prefer me to show you a clear video of one?
 

Patrick J. Kelly

Banned
Banned
No offense intended...but if i directed you to a 20,000 page library of my rock-solid evidence of unicorns, wouldn't you just prefer me to show you a clear video of one?
Absolutely not. Some people enjoy making fake videos. This has nothing to do with the QEG. Please stay on topic.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
This is off-topic here. E-mail me direct at engpjk (at) gmail.com.
You made an extraordinary claim ("It is perfectly possible to run a standard, unmodified petrol generator with water as the only visible fuel, self-powering and providing kilowatts of excess energy and those have been used for years in off-grid locations."). Back it up. You can do it here or in a new thread.
 

Patrick J. Kelly

Banned
Banned
Right... but they don't make fake over-unity energy devices. :rolleyes: the topic is whether the device(s) in the OP are really showing over unity. Have any input on that?
Of course thay make fake devices which they claim are COP>1, that is the whole point. I don't believe that the QEG is COP>1 and I can see no reason why anyone else would believe that.
 

Patrick J. Kelly

Banned
Banned
You mean, it may have other fuel which is not visible?
Yes, of course, the same energy that powers the universe. How else do you think that a Joe Cell can power a Ford pick-up truck with using any gasoline? But then perhaps you don't believe that in spite of Bill Williams' family being threatened because of it.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Of course thay make fake devices which they claim are COP>1, that is the whole point. I don't believe that the QEG is COP>1 and I can see no reason why anyone else would believe that.
Please back up your claims of evidence of free energy. If you don't post any evidence, I'll have to assume you are trolling, and ban you.
 

Hama Neggs

Senior Member
Yes, of course, the same energy that powers the universe. How else do you think that a Joe Cell can power a Ford pick-up truck with using any gasoline? But then perhaps you don't believe that in spite of Bill Williams' family being threatened because of it.
Stock-in-trade for conspiracy theorists: proof = somebody was supposedly threatened over it. :rolleyes:
 

Patrick J. Kelly

Banned
Banned
You made an extraordinary claim ("It is perfectly possible to run a standard, unmodified petrol generator with water as the only visible fuel, self-powering and providing kilowatts of excess energy and those have been used for years in off-grid locations."). Back it up. You can do it here or in a new thread.
There is nothing extraordinary in the claim as it is a standard technology well proven over the years. I am not interested in starting a new thread as information exchange is far, far too slow on a forum. You will find full details in chapter 10 of my ebook if you care to read it. This information has been publicly shared for years now and I am amazed that you good people are not aware of it. It is a technology which really does not interest me as it has moving mechanical parts, while my interest lies with motionless generators (which I personally use every day). You ask me to back the statement up. I have done that for several years now, publishing the principles, the designs, the video links, the construction details. I certainly have no intention of going back to square one and explaining it all again step-by-step when it is already there free for the taking - be realistic.
 

Hama Neggs

Senior Member
Yes, of course, the same energy that powers the universe. How else do you think that a Joe Cell can power a Ford pick-up truck with using any gasoline? But then perhaps you don't believe that in spite of Bill Williams' family being threatened because of it.
So what's the purpose of the water?
 

David Coulter

Senior Member
Jeeze, and I thought the magical georesonance supporters were [...]. The overunity energy people are double [...]. But maybe they come from a parallel universe where the laws of physics are different.

The so-called "Law of Conservation of Energy" applies only to "closed systems" and there are none of those in this universe as everywhere is subject to gravity, heat, electromagnetic radiation, cosmic particles, ....
Obviously I can build an overunity (fuel use) motor-generator provided it has huge solar panels and batteries attached to it! And I don't need to go to Morocco to do it (although, realistically, it would be easier to do in Morocco than Ireland).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pete Tar

Senior Member
A couple of comments from overunity forum...
 

scombrid

Senior Member
There are so many different methods of gaining free-energy that it really is not possible to discuss them here,
Everything is up for discussion. The impossibility arises when impossible things are claimed and no evidence provided.

so I invite you to visit my web site www.free-energy-info.com where there is a free ebook download of some 2600 pages giving the run-down on more than a hundred of these systems,
I think you're going to need to make a little more effort than that to find a mark or two around here.

Please remember that here we are just commenting on the QEG system and not free-energy as a whole.

Patrick
Oh but we are Patrick, we are.
 

Landru

Moderator
Staff member
Everything is up for discussion. The impossibility arises when impossible things are claimed and no evidence provided.



I think you're going to need to make a little more effort than that to find a mark or two around here.



Oh but we are Patrick, we are.
He has been banned.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member
A fascinating post that tries to deflect the substantial criticisms directed at the demonstrated results of the project, by ignoring them completely and instead spinning an elaborate story complete with psychological profiling.
Note that debunker = troll (and also mental/emotional damage).
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Hopegirl, you could put this all to rest simply by demonstrating your machine running self powered for an hour - preferably on a glass-topped table, outdoors (you can use a generator to start it). And have it open to inspection.

The utter failure of anyone to do this can only indicate that it does not work.
 

MikeC

Closed Account
Yes indeed - the repeated failure of free energy/over-unity believers to demonstrate their machines in action without multiple caveats, potential for hidden input, etc, is pointed and damning IMO.
 

David Coulter

Senior Member
A fascinating post that tries to deflect the substantial criticisms directed at the demonstrated results of the project, by ignoring them completely and instead spinning an elaborate story complete with psychological profiling.
It was nice to learn I am a member of The Cabal. As an introvert I was never a "joiner".

Follow Hopegirl's link to the "Fix The World Project PDF" if you want an interesting read - seems to be a CT bible. Her proposed new world order is a combination of Libertarianism, Communism, Anarchism, New Age-ism, and 1984-ism (purge all recorded history and replace with "true history"). I am not going to quote any of it here as it is so long and contains every CT concept.
 

David Coulter

Senior Member
Latest QEG video:

I am confused by what the guy in the video is trying to prove other than you can generate an AC phase shift by putting capacitors in a circuit. X axis on the oscilloscope is phase and has nothing to do with the power being generated. All that is happening is that the tank circuit is delaying the AC by a fraction of a cycle by storing and releasing charge in capacitors. Is that the bunk here? They are confusing people by arguing that phase equals power rather than total amplitude? Did I miss something in the video?
 

David Coulter

Senior Member
That link makes it clear. They are generating a phase shift which increases var, but var is meaningless for running anything as the imaginary part does no work. A clever way to fool people. In fact, the video does start out like a magic trick: "nothing under the table" [waving hand under table].
 

Efftup

Senior Member
what is the quantum effect that is claimed to be generated? Or is it just throwing Quantum in there cos it's sciencey and mysterious (it's how Homeopathy "works" too, apparently) to make the thing sound more plausible, of course linking with Tesla, because EVERYONE knows the NWO suppressed all of Tesla's best work. Never mind the fact that Tesla's Resonance device was a steam powered oscillator and had nothing to do with this QEG machine.

I agree with everyone else. If it works, it; should be easy to prove it. demonstrate it starting up from a power source and then remove the power source, to show it works without. and allowing the machine to be examined to show there is no hidden power source.

As you can not just create energy out of nothing, if it does work, where does the energy actually come from? has any QEG proponent ever actually come up with a sensible hypothesis for this?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
In fact, the video does start out like a magic trick: "nothing under the table" [waving hand under table].
Nothing under the table, except for all these wires, and the dark areas.

I don't think they had an extra power source though, as they did not generate extra power. But it was a rather poor demonstration.

And anyone who has see Veproject1's videos knows faking perpetual motion on video is quite possible:
https://www.youtube.com/user/veproject1/videos
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: First object teleported to Earth's orbit [Quantum Communication] Science and Pseudoscience 11
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 13
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
JFDee Debunked: Wernher von Braun confirmed that rockets can't leave earth Conspiracy Theories 23
Mick West Debunked: Missing $21 Trillion / $6.5 Trillion / $2.3 Trillion - Journal Vouchers Conspiracy Theories 33
MikeG Debunked: Obamacare Article 54 (Satire FB Page) General Discussion 2
Mick West Debunked: "Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth’s Surface:" [Stray Light] Contrails and Chemtrails 30
Astro Debunked: Apollo Lunar Module Hatch Too Small for Spacesuit Science and Pseudoscience 0
Mick West Debunked: NIST's Lack of Explanation for WTC7 Freefall [They Have One - Column Buckling] 9/11 38
Jedo Debunked: WTC7 was the only building not on the WTC block that had a fire on 9/11 9/11 0
Mick West Debunked: Thermite Slag on WTC beams [Oxy Cutting Slag] 9/11 2
Mick West Debunked: The WTC 9/11 Angle Cut Column. [Not Thermite, Cut Later] 9/11 137
Mick West Debunked: AE911Truth's Analysis of Slag Residue from WTC Debris 9/11 20
Dan Wilson Debunked: Steven Crowder: The AIDS epidemic was a hoax Health and Quackery 9
Dan Wilson Debunked: Infowars product damages sperm Health and Quackery 2
Mick West Debunked: Corbett Report Targeted by Google/Youtube Conspiracy Theories 37
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top