Debunked: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG), 10kw out for 1kw in.

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Is this credible science? Good if so.

 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
No. It's just an old scam. They just sell consulting services at $300 per hour, as you try to get the machine to work, for as long as you let them.
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
This is a particularly silly example. At no point does he unplug it. It's just the mains power driving a motor that then powers a reluctance generator that is lighting some bulbs:




So all he is demonstrating is that he's assembled the machine. "Achieving resonance" sounds very new age, but really it's just getting the generator running at the right speed to form a resonant circuit ( a "tank circuit") with the capacitors. Assuming he's genuine he'll now move on to trying to get it to run when it is not plugged in. He may manage to get it to run for a short while off the capacitors, but it will quickly stop. Then he will contact the inventors, and they will charge him consulting fees as they try to troubleshoot what he "did wrong". Eventually he will give up.

Here's the schematic of the device. The red circuit is the actual generator. The green circuit is a resonant circuit - a "tank circuit" that will store energy (but not create energy).



So all he is doing is spinning it up fast enough so that the generator circuit will light the bulbs, and the tank circuit is resonating. It's unclear to me if the tank circuit does anything.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Bugger, so I see.
http://www.overunity.com/14443/quantum-energy-generator-qeg-open-sourced-by-hopegirl/
http://revolution-green.com/open-sourced-qeg-generator-show-data/

The fine print is kind of interesting.


 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
And unfortunately, based on this post, I suspect they might actually be a group of honest true believers who think they are getting something:
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2014/04/status-of-qeg-build-morocco-build-day-3.html

"Orbs" are a reference to things like illuminated specks of dust that people mistake for some kind of ethereal spirit, like this one, from a speck of dust close to the lens that is lit by the flash:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orb_(optics)


Unfortunately these people have been conned. But they are so optimistic it's going to take a while before they realize (if ever).
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Another example of the same thing, again they don't disconnect it from the power supply
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
This is from the guy who actually sells it, and he claims that he's unplugged it. Impossible to tell from the video, but of course it's trivially easy to fake.

And this is what he is selling:

 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
True believers.
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
True believers.

As soon as I saw the posted examples of their publications and appeals for "Donations", and use the word "ministry", then the scam was self-evident.

Man, they even throw in "chem"trails... [...]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Actually I don't think WITTS are entirely true believers. They are the ones selling things.

The people in the original video probably are though, which is rather unfortunate. I suppose no great harm will come to them though.

[Politeness note: WITTS seems to be a scam, there's no problem with pointing that out. They have scammed innocent people - but in order to convince those people that they have been scammed, it's best to be polite in pointing it out. i.e. avoid critiquing their education, etc. ]
 

FreiZeitGeist

Senior Member.
The Mean-Goal of this isn´t debunked at all, but there isn´t any proof for their claims also...

Besides that these machines where not unplugged, their claim is that they get 10KW electrical power from just 1KW input - to proofe that claim, you need at least a set of Multimeters on the input and on the output-side.

I can´t see any Multimeter anywhere! Where are they?!

You have to measure and monitore Volt/Ampere at the Inside and also on the Outside. Light-Bulbs doesn´t proofe anything.

Free-Energy-Believers mostly just show Voltage or Ampere on the Input/Output-Side. Electrical Power is the combination of Voltage and Current (in Ampere), so you have to measure both at the Inside and Outside of your wonderfull Free-Energy-Machine to proofe that you´re getting additional Energy with it.

... where are the measuring instruments in those Videos?I can´t spot anyone!
 
Last edited:

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Yeah it's not a 'hard' debunk, I think this is 'debunked' for lack of any verifiable evidence for an extraordinary claim. If it's claiming something contrary to known physics, and without verifiable evidence of an actual working device, then it can be dismissed.
The fact that they have a dubious worldview isn't hard evidence against them but it does contribute.
 
J

Joe

Guest
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Does this mean anything to anyone?
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
Does this mean anything to anyone?

Yes. :p

images.jpeg
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
Well, am finding a lot when using a simple search of "qeg scam".

Been around for many years, keeps popping up apparently.

Open Sourced QEG generator: Show Me The Data



 
Per http://quantamagnetics.com/:

,
. . . etc, etc. I see no claims that more energy is coming out than is going in. Doesn't sound like overunity to me.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
If people have a problem with a post, then report it.

Otherwise, let's stick to the topic. Here we have a video of a supposed free-energy machine, yet it's clearly only running because it's plugged in. That's really all there is to it.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Posting this from the overunity forum as it seems to be a summary of what's going on with the device, though it's all greek to me.
ETA. The post following this disputes the COP 1.2 claim, so I'm including that just to cover possible bunk...

 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The overunity people also seem to be overenthusiastic. 30 years of fiddling with this device, and they have never demonstrated actual "overunity" to actually power a light bulb, let alone a house.

And if they DID actually get 120% efficiency, then they would indeed win the Nobel prize, revolutionize the world of science, and save the planet. Their excuse for failing to document it was that it was "pre-internet".

To the OP, the cheering group got their plans (for free) from Fix the World. Here's the FTW consulting page:
http://www.fixtheworldproject.net/ftw-qeg-consulting.html
It's basically a more easy-going version of the WITTS Ministry, Enlightened Technology, from above.
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
I've seen a lot of scams in my time, but this strikes me as one of the most cynical and cruel.

You basically get someone to believe that building this bizarre machine will mysteriously defy the laws of science
and accomplish something that no one--Einstein, Tesla, etc.--has ever been able to accomplish...

and when that inevitably fails, you try to sell them multiple $300 phone calls to talk with "servants of god."

It makes the Nigerian scam look downright benign and quaint by comparison.
 
Last edited:

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
They were consulting with people in Taiwan last month, and had plans to take the scheme to Morocco. I don't see how they can stay ahead of their failure to produce.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
From their forum

Invoking the 'bad vibes make it not work' line.
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
Invoking the 'bad vibes make it not work' line.

Even worse (and, I had noted that previously...as if they are implying that one must "believe" in the process in order for it to "work"?).

The reference to the famed "Double-Slit" experiment in the physics of quantum mechanics, and what seems to be an appeal to (again) a very simplistic and layperson understanding of what is represented by that science, in a manner that seems intent on attempting to perpetuate a hoax.

This does not intend to slur those not familiar with QM (surely, it is NOT my field!), but I make a concerted effort to attempt (also a layperson in this science) to at least understand it to the best of my abilities. Not always successful, so I rely on the established experts in the field, as guides.
 
It doesn't require a shift in consciousness to measure power in and compare it to power out. Who are these people?
 

Balance

Senior Member.
Class act! Give away schematics for a wealth machine that will not produce the goods and sell premium support services for it, adding the clause 'having the right frame of mind' required.

"but sir, it's not a scam you simply have the wrong attitude, that's why it won't work". "and when it is working for you, we're selling today only at a rock-bottom price of $1million a month, a five-year exclusive sales right for your area" "p,s, want to buy a bridge?"
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
In general "funny" YouTube videos are to be avoided. Most people don't watch them, and they confuse people.
 

JesusSuperLight

New Member
To be fair to Peter Linderman he did not use the fact that it was pre internet as an excuse but a fact. 120% over unity was not enough to make the machine run itself making it a failure. This is a terrible scam, I dont know why this is being circulated as of interest...except their reaction was interesting. The man seems to look like he has scored a goal but maybe the ball bounced off the back of his head into the net. This guy is pretty much lost for words whilst he turns the machine slotwly off. Odd stuff. Maybe it is over efficient and we just need about three of these machine in each room of the house, i'm sure we would get used to the noise
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Well according to the forum I'm following, the latest build in Morocco didn't achieve anything special.
 

Jazzy

Closed Account
This does not intend to slur those not familiar with QM (surely, it is NOT my field!), but I make a concerted effort to attempt (also a layperson in this science) to at least understand it to the best of my abilities. Not always successful, so I rely on the established experts in the field, as guides.
It's a popular sport, searching for a niche to suspend a loose trick of one's imagination in, so that one can become a leader in a hitherto-unknown field. One is a child running out into a freshly fallen snowfield, placing one's steps where no man has trod. Until the snow melts.

Not that I know much about it either, but I do know of "the quantum barrier", that the quantum world is frictionless, and once one's in it, one's calculations are Newtonian only. In other words, there's very little in the way of connections or extrapolations which connect to our middle world, let alone the cosmic world of the universe. The whole idea is a straw man perpetrated by straw people.
 

Jazzy

Closed Account
Does this mean anything to anyone?
It can certainly warm cold soup then. Let's call it a "microwave oven", poorly described.
 

AB Hammer

New Member
The biggest problem with overunity videos are some have so many wires it is easy to slip in something to fake people out. I will admit that I do play with the gravity approach. But one must understand that it is not always the journey's end, but what you learn on the way. There are other inventions that can come from such a quest. Here are some of my crazy attempts at the quest. I do find it fascinating and have had some interesting builds that are not yet on my youtube. http://www.youtube.com/user/ABthehammer?feature=watch

Things to look for on a gravity wheel.
1. A slow start on its own, or a small bump or push to get it started. Not a fast hand actions.
2. It will pick up noticeable speed if it is a possible.
3. have them set it on its side for it will stop and make no noise in that position. If a motor is in it? It will still make noise.
These are indication in a closed design demo. An open demo have the wheel removed from it's stand and it still be running and have them turn around for full visibility.
Also look closely for any fishing line for it is used in fakes.

Alan
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: First object teleported to Earth's orbit [Quantum Communication] Science and Pseudoscience 11
D Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 38
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 75
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 8
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: Wisconsin Turnout 89% Impossible High [Actually 72%] Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Video of Poll Worker "Filling In" Ballots. Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 4
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs and Aliens 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top