yea. definitely looks more smokey in closeup. he doesnt say where he got the original from.Looks like an engine fire. And a 777 only has two engines
Why on earth would he do such a thing? Such a photo would seem to be 'Holy Grail" material for the chemtrail crowd. You would think that if one of them took such a photo he would be proud of the accomplishment.. he doesnt say where he got the original from.
at least he checked to make sure it wasn't photoshopped before claiming it was chemtrails ; )Why on earth would he do such a thing? Such a photo would seem to be 'Holy Grail" material for the chemtrail crowd. You would think that if one of them took such a photo he would be proud of the accomplishment.
More than likely they stole the photo and are trying to use it in a way that is less than truthful. I am trying to be polite I could have used far stronger language.
This one is making the rounds, no provenance, probably cropped from a spotter's image
View attachment 7097
Any ideas? Tineye gave me no results.
I'm not sure what your question is, but it is an Antonov AN-124. So... with Russian jet engines... it's entirely possible that 3 of them have failed (just kidding)!
Oh! You are looking for the original?
Thanks! Your clue led to a solution, this pic has previously come under examination:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/iluyshin-96-oil-leak-photo-trail-from-single-engine.2422/
Thought it looked familiar
External Quote:BAE Systems' BAe 146 Atmospheric Research Aircraft has started another tour of duty within the Arctic circle to gather data that will improve predictions about the region's future climate.
This latest campaign - known as Aerosol Cloud-Coupling and Climate Interactions in the Arctic - consists of a team of scientists from the British Antarctic Survey, the UK Met office and four UK universities. The team is seeking to better interpret current climate change science by improving understanding of how clouds and aerosols in the Arctic atmosphere influence its climate in particular - and the global climate in general.
yea. definitely looks more smokey in closeup. he doesnt say where he got the original from.
https://www.facebook.com/1410029482561123/photos/pb.1410029482561123.-2207520000.1399058956./1433003350263736/?type=3&theater
View attachment 7108
Saw this posted on the Chemtrails Global Skywatch FB page:
View attachment 7175
A quick search shows that it is this plane:
PICTURES: BAe 146 Atmospheric Research Aircraft sets off on three-week Arctic mission (archive)
External Quote:BAE Systems' BAe 146 Atmospheric Research Aircraft has started another tour of duty within the Arctic circle to gather data that will improve predictions about the region's future climate.
This latest campaign - known as Aerosol Cloud-Coupling and Climate Interactions in the Arctic - consists of a team of scientists from the British Antarctic Survey, the UK Met office and four UK universities. The team is seeking to better interpret current climate change science by improving understanding of how clouds and aerosols in the Arctic atmosphere influence its climate in particular - and the global climate in general.
I dont get it.. what is so groundbreaking in the world of Chemtrails etc, with this pic.. it looks like a test flight for an aircraft. Am I missing something obvious?
I don't think it's as much about what is in the picture but that the word aerosol is used in the description of what they are doing. I think a lot of people get caught up on this and that is automatically and exclusively means man-sprayed instead of natural occurring aerosols and man made pollution.I dont get it.. what is so groundbreaking in the world of Chemtrails etc, with this pic.. it looks like a test flight for an aircraft. Am I missing something obvious?
That may be why it originally starts getting passed around, and then it gets reposted without any of that context, simply as a "chemtrail plane." This fits with their idea of what one of those "military spray planes" might look like on the inside, shared "annomonously" by an insider.I don't think it's as much about what is in the picture but that the word aerosol is used in the description of what they are doing. I think a lot of people get caught up on this and that is automatically and exclusively means man-sprayed instead of natural occurring aerosols and man made pollution.
Just look at the size of those screens! That's no ordinary in-flight entertainment.
It's been thrown at me a couple of times as a "chem-sprayer"
This looks to be a rocket launch, but it strange looking to many
http://www.paranormics.com/hyper-dimensional-overlap-in-hawaii-caught-on-film/
This is a spoof
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=727766600621791&substory_index=0&id=196749240390199
No doubt it will be filling the Facebook pages of the chemtrail community as fact:
View attachment 7759
View attachment 7760
I guessed it was an MD-11...(well, not too hard, the "3 engines" was a bit of a giveaway!!). Just, with my (very old) knowledge of the DC-10, I am not all that familiar with the MD-11 differences.
EDIT: The cabin temp knob labelled "Courier"...this is likely a FedEx jet (?)
This is a spoof
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=727766600621791&substory_index=0&id=196749240390199
No doubt it will be filling the Facebook pages of the chemtrail community as fact:
......and another version making the rounds...
......and another version making the rounds,
here....
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10203311987834030&set=o.330176123695801&type=1&permPage=1
The non-altered image is here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...7_700_Flight_Simulator_in_Berlin_IMG_0138.JPG
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...lane-malaysian-cloud-seeding-from-c-130.3637/Any ideas on this? Tineye not much help and reverse image search doesn't seem to work on Google on iOS.
View attachment 8259
it's own thread