They all burn beautifully, subject to the same rules as for kerosine:[*]50-80% "Heavy Aromatic Naptha",
[*]5-10% each Napthalene and "BUTYLATED HYDROXTOLUENE/2,6-DI-TERT-BUTYL-P-CRESOL",
[*]1-5% "MINERAL OIL, PETROLEUM DISTILLATE, SOLVENT DEWAXED (SEVERE), HEAVY PARAFFINIC", and
[*]<3% "DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE"
It's exactly the same strategy as the previous, er, wossname.A Machiavellian ploy to manipulate a plastic victory.
Oh well, whatever. He'll get his hollow fame.
Does anyone know exactly what proportion is used of Stadis to aviation spirit? (I'd guess about 1 : 2000).
OK. 0.003 grams is 0.000003 Kg. A litre of avgas weighs 0.8 Kg, so 0.8/0.000003 makes the proportion 1 : 267,000.Max 3 mg/L for aviation turbine fuel
That's what I do. Be jealous."I don't wanna work, I just want to bang on the drum all day."
I'm pretty sure that Jim manipulated this entire thread from the start for what he feels will be his gain.
As we all know there is not a definitive history of weather control, therefore I have put much effort into creating one. This page will grow over time, with many additions/corrections.
Each slide has an image, with reference links beneath the image.
Please send me any links to other timelines and reference material that can help me flesh this story out.
The main concern with this is the inclusion of what might be irrelevancies. For example, why is HAARP important except for its relationship to conspiracy theories?
I do not ascribe to conspiracy theories, only fact. HAARP can do the following in regards to modifying the climate...
...You might say the only conspiracy is how all this goes on for fifty years and you seem to have no clue.
"Aviation fuels contain additives with “trade secret” ingredients. "
Seems to be out of date - the latest MSDS for Stadis 450 lists no secret ingredients - perhaps you could get them to update their obsolete information?Octel Starreon Stadis® 450 is a static dissipator, comprised of dinonylnapthalene sulfonic acid and other organic solvents, and according to the product MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet), it contains two “trade secret” ingredients . Stadis 450 is the only approved anti-static additive for use in Air Force aviation fuels, including JP-8, JP-5, JET-A1, and JET-B .
|View Detailed Observations for the last|
48 Hours · 14 Days
|View Complete Hourly Forecast »||Radar · Satellite · Surface Analysis|
Hmm its pretty dry today and there are a few persistent contrails ? no weather fronts ? Weather ReportHome » Local » Weather Report
Vero Beach, Florida
Weather Report | Interactive Weather Map | Extended Forecast | Hourly Forecast | Past Observations | Historic Averages |
Current Conditions - °F | °C
As of 12:53 PM on Wednesday 15 May 2013 (Local Time) from KVRB Reporting Station
View Detailed Observations for the last
48 Hours · 14 Days
View Complete Hourly Forecast »
Radar · Satellite · Surface Analysis
You would be ifIf I was looking for subject matter to complete a doctoral dissertation for psychology, I'd pick Jim...and the chemtrail community. This thread is all over the map!
PDF https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/2966/1/Noppel%202007.pdf3.4.1 Fuel sulphur contentSulphur plays an integral role in the contrail formation process, facilitating water
nucleation on soot particles and providing volatile particles serving as condensation
nuclei. A reduction of the fuel sulphur content would reduce the emission of SO3
and H2SO4, and have an impact on the aerosol density in the plume and contrail
precursor activation. It would be technically possible to reduce the fuel sulphur
content. However, reducing the fuel content might have no or only a very little
impact on contrail formation as mentioned in section 2.1.2. Water nucleation on
soot particles is believed to be independent of the presence of sulphur species in
the plume [Popovitcheva et al., 2001]. And even if sulphur free fuel led to the
absence of volatile particles and avoided water nucleationon soot particles, ambient
background particles would still provide sufﬁcient condensation nuclei. Contrails
formed on background particles, however, would very likely be composed of fewer
but larger ice particles, which because of their radiative properties could result in
a lower positive radiative forcing. The impact of contrails with fewer but larger
particles on contrail cirrus formation has not been investigated up to now.
Fuel sulfur is NOT an "additive", Joe.
Look Like ? Or act Like ? Stubborn me ? Maybe? but not blind to the truth . Its been a year for me on this form and nobody has successfully convinced me otherwise . I have learned quite a bit but still have my own opinion on what I believe . Its actually 150 pages so not done yet . It will take me a few days with my busy workload .Do you even need to read all of it? You don't look like someone who will budge no matter how much scientifically accurate material they read.
OK. 0.003 grams is 0.000003 Kg. A litre of avgas weighs 0.8 Kg, so 0.8/0.000003 makes the proportion 1 : 267,000.
That's what I do. Be jealous.
A timely reminder about disinformation concerning chemtrails on the internet. Please 'like' this so more people read it, and hopefully get the message once and for all.
A number of photos still circulate the internet, particularly on Facebook, of plane refueling and ballast systems, purported to be "chemtrail tanks". This is an internet myth originally put out by unscrupulous people who want to paint activists as uneducated, and thus dismiss the overwhelming evidence that geoengineering, weather control and chemtrail agendas are scientific and historical fact. These ballast systems are for testing the weight/balance of planes. Using such photos as "evidence of chemtrails" continues to do a great disservice to activists, as they are easily proven as part of the regular testing regime of aircraft. Disinfo artists and internet fools such as 'Madistonstar Moon' who have apparently no formal education whatsoever and just "make stuff up" should be called out for what they are.
Let me briefly explain the modern methods of chemtrails, that are factually supported, and why I believe separated tanks to be unnecessary, and even hazardous and a "dead giveaway", to the point where it should be considered they are no longer commonly used at all.
Modern chemtrails in DOMESTIC craft are more than likely achieved through the JP-8 jet fuel additive Stadis 450. There are several other variations also. Many safety sheets from the aviation industry will not include that it is, in fact, barium salt.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/139917532/Stadis-450-DINNSA-Barium-Salt-Aviation-Fuel-Additive <- right there in black and white for you guys. Fuel tanks (types) may be changed at altitude. Also search "biofuel alumina nanoparticle" which is unfortunately what we are heading towards. When a flight climbs above around, let's say 31,000ft, there is always condensation (even though you can't see it) whereby the oxidation (burning of fuel) will produce a thicker chemtrail (due to additives) for whatever purpose (SRM, conductivity) due to the specific properties of the aerosols (Föppl et al., 1966; Prenatt et al., 1969; Lüst, 2002).
MILITARY craft only need an oxidation disk at point of combustion as you see in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrvK30Gzh_0 . <- single or twin jet engine system. These craft do not have the sufficient space that would allow for extra tanks.
Military craft more than likely use outlets for a full wing spray via oxidation disks. They may even still use tanks in some older models, which has been evidenced recently by military whistleblowers in the United States, and may also be the case in the planes that C.A.S.A. refuse to identify here, some of which appear to be decommissioned airliners and former active-duty military planes.
Regardless, evidence shows that no tanks are needed. Patents demonstrate this, with the more recent patents not mentioning tanks at all. This explains why domestic pilots and service crews in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other places have investigated their planes and found no tanks following the beginning of the modern chemtrail phenomenon. The pilots who could not account for the massive plumes now trailing for hundreds of kilometres behind their craft, and yet have been unable to locate the tanks and ducted systems required, a "dead giveaway", now have a much more simple and scientifically parsimonious explanation to investigate. I encourage everyone involved to continue researching these avenues further and sharing facts rather than hearsay and falsehoods.
Awake Australia & Australians Against Chemtrails
Can the first appearance of this photo used as chemtrail evidence be traced?This is an internet myth originally put out by unscrupulous people who want to paint activists as uneducated,...
That had better be a nervous laugh.
Someone posted in this thread that they thought Jazzy may have been me. . I was giving Russell Tanner a hard time a few months ago. Jazzy must be an asshole.. Haha
I told him that I confessed to being a govt employee and that I was going to "spray the fuck out of Bangor Maine tomorrow " - Ha accused me of being one of "Mick West's cronies", selectively deleted my posts and blocked me ... So I looked up Mick and signed up here.
A hollow propaganda victory for believers in the end, to my mind.
Those incorrectly attributed comments now have a life of their own, and are touted around the chemtrails believers online in an attempt to discredit both Metabunk generally and some users specifically, used to confirm thoughtss of those who've fallen for the hoax who might otherwise use this website to learn some facts.
Just goes to show the unintended consequences of trolling, sadly. It pays to be careful with those who've bought into these kind of theories.