Aviation fuel additives

MikeC said:
[*]50-80% "Heavy Aromatic Naptha",
[*]5-10% each Napthalene and "BUTYLATED HYDROXTOLUENE/2,6-DI-TERT-BUTYL-P-CRESOL",
[*]1-5% "MINERAL OIL, PETROLEUM DISTILLATE, SOLVENT DEWAXED (SEVERE), HEAVY PARAFFINIC", and
[*]<3% "DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE"
[/LIST]
Click to expand...
They all burn beautifully, subject to the same rules as for kerosine:

combustion.gif

I think it's possible to see how small any Stadis residue will be. No more than the kerosine it replaces.

Less than indicated here, as this diagram is 20 yrs old, and engines have moved on. The only thing it might do is raise the sulfur dioxide emission by 0.000x per cent, as there is fractional percentage of sulfur in aviation spirit to begin with.

Does anyone know exactly what proportion is used of Stadis to aviation spirit? (I'd guess about 1 : 2000).

Isn't it only used in hot dry conditions? Deserts and such? Doesn't the static-reducing humidity of temperate-to-cool regions rule out the need for it? Have I missed that?
 
Pete Tar said:
A Machiavellian ploy to manipulate a plastic victory.
Oh well, whatever. He'll get his hollow fame.
Click to expand...
It's exactly the same strategy as the previous, er, wossname.

We ought to be able to see them coming, and prevent them from self-extracting themselves without damaging their standing, at least. That's what they're using us to try to build.

These people are truly [....]y. Oh, f[..]k.

Actually there is something we can do. Agree among ourselves for one person at a time to ask the first pertinent question and not allow ourselves to be distracted from receiving an answer.

Stick to not just the ONE topic, but just the SINGLE QUESTION.

And keep demanding a satisfactory answer to it, before we move on further. As Mick says.

When confronted with such an alien and systematic approach, it's our self-discipline that is called to question. Even more so if such guys team up.
 
M Bornong said:
I'm pretty sure that Jim manipulated this entire thread from the start for what he feels will be his gain.
Click to expand...

He posted a link to his facebook today that says:

World's top geoengineers discussing my Weather Control timeline!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!s...ntrol/geoengineering/h6yLe4D3AXk/LsPefgNrrIYJ

His introductory post that start the thread:

I would like to extend an invitation to everyone in this community to please browse, share, and fact check an interactive javascript timeline based on weather modification and geoengineering.
As we all know there is not a definitive history of weather control, therefore I have put much effort into creating one. This page will grow over time, with many additions/corrections.
Each slide has an image, with reference links beneath the image.
Please send me any links to other timelines and reference material that can help me flesh this story out.
Click to expand...


There was a favorable reception with some constructive criticism about how to beef it up with peer review content and refine the distinction between weather modification and geoengineering. They were taking him seriously and were fairly complementary.

But then Ken Caldiera made the comment:


The main concern with this is the inclusion of what might be irrelevancies. For example, why is HAARP important except for its relationship to conspiracy theories?
Click to expand...

Jim then just launched into it:

I do not ascribe to conspiracy theories, only fact. HAARP can do the following in regards to modifying the climate...

...You might say the only conspiracy is how all this goes on for fifty years and you seem to have no clue.
Click to expand...

With his usual copy/paste and link dump gish gallop.

That ended the thread. He probably takes that as a victory.
 
JRBids said:
http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2013/05...ives-and-contrails-pollute-global-atmosphere/


"Aviation fuels contain additives with "trade secret" ingredients. "
Click to expand...

From that site:

External Quote:
Octel Starreon Stadis® 450 is a static dissipator, comprised of dinonylnapthalene sulfonic acid and other organic solvents, and according to the product MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet), it contains two "trade secret" ingredients [18]. Stadis 450 is the only approved anti-static additive for use in Air Force aviation fuels, including JP-8, JP-5, JET-A1, and JET-B [9].
Seems to be out of date - the latest MSDS for Stadis 450 lists no secret ingredients - perhaps you could get them to update their obsolete information?
 
Hmm its pretty dry today and there are a few persistent contrails ? no weather fronts ? Weather ReportHome » Local » Weather Report
images.intellicast.com_App_Images_icon_email_forward.gif


Vero Beach, Florida
Weather Report | Interactive Weather Map | Extended Forecast | Hourly Forecast | Past Observations | Historic Averages |

images.intellicast.com_App_Themes_Silver_Images_icon_print.gif

Current Conditions - °F | °C
As of 12:53 PM on Wednesday 15 May 2013 (Local Time) from KVRB Reporting Station

[TABLE="width: 658"]
[TR]
[TD]
Wind Chill:79°Ceiling:Unl
Heat Index:80°Visibility:10mi
Dew Point:62°Wind:13mph
Humidity:56%Direction:40° (NE)
Pressure:30.22"Gusts:NA

[TD="colspan: 2"]
images.intellicast.com_App_Images_40_white_wx_66.png
Few Clouds[/TD]
[TD="class: Empty"] [/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"] 79°F Feels Like: 80° [/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"] [/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"] [/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"] [/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"] [/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"] [/TD]

[TD="colspan: 5"] Report Text: KVRB 151653Z 04011KT 10SM FEW040 26/17 A3022 RMK AO2 SLP233 T02610167[/TD]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="width: 172"]
[TR]
[TD="class: Hour"]2 PM
P Cloudy[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour"][/TD]
[TD="class: Hour, align: right"]80°[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Hour"]3 PM
P Cloudy[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour"][/TD]
[TD="class: Hour, align: right"]80°[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Hour"]4 PM
M Sunny[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour"][/TD]
[TD="class: Hour, align: right"]79°[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD]
Local Information​

No Weather Alerts
for this location

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: ContainerLink, bgcolor: #EAEBEC, align: center"]View Detailed Observations for the last
48 Hours · 14 Days[/TD]
[TD="class: ContainerLink, bgcolor: #EAEBEC, align: center"]View Complete Hourly Forecast »[/TD]
[TD="class: ContainerLink, bgcolor: #EAEBEC, align: center"]Radar · Satellite · Surface Analysis[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joe said:
Hmm its pretty dry today and there are a few persistent contrails ? no weather fronts ? Weather ReportHome » Local » Weather Report
images.intellicast.com_App_Images_icon_email_forward.gif


Vero Beach, Florida
Weather Report | Interactive Weather Map | Extended Forecast | Hourly Forecast | Past Observations | Historic Averages |

images.intellicast.com_App_Themes_Silver_Images_icon_print.gif

Current Conditions - °F | °C
As of 12:53 PM on Wednesday 15 May 2013 (Local Time) from KVRB Reporting Station

[TABLE="width: 658"]
[TR]
[TD]
Wind Chill:
79°
Ceiling:
Unl
Heat Index:
80°
Visibility:
10mi
Dew Point:
62°
Wind:
13mph
Humidity:
56%
Direction:
40° (NE)
Pressure:
30.22"
Gusts:
NA

[TD="colspan: 2"]
images.intellicast.com_App_Images_40_white_wx_66.png
Few Clouds
[/TD]
[TD="class: Empty"][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"] 79°F Feels Like: 80°
[/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"][/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"][/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"][/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"][/TD]

[TD="class: Empty"][/TD]

[TD="colspan: 5"] Report Text: KVRB 151653Z 04011KT 10SM FEW040 26/17 A3022 RMK AO2 SLP233 T02610167
[/TD]
[/TD]
[TD]
[TABLE="width: 172"]
[TR]
[TD="class: Hour"]2 PM
P Cloudy
[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour"]
[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour, align: right"]80°
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Hour"]3 PM
P Cloudy
[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour"]
[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour, align: right"]80°
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Hour"]4 PM
M Sunny
[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour"]
[/TD]
[TD="class: Hour, align: right"]79°
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD]
Local Information​

No Weather Alerts
for this location

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: ContainerLink, bgcolor: #eaebec"]View Detailed Observations for the last
48 Hours · 14 Days
[/TD]
[TD="class: ContainerLink, bgcolor: #eaebec"]View Complete Hourly Forecast »
[/TD]
[TD="class: ContainerLink, bgcolor: #eaebec"]Radar · Satellite · Surface Analysis
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Click to expand...

Well drive on down to Miami and hop a flight to Houston and sample the bleed air in the cabin while you're passing through (and making new) trails over the Gulf of Mexico (trails that are visible on the GoMEX visible loop drifting rapidly toward Florida right now).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are no trails drifting they are being formed . No fronts low humidity and 30 mile long contrails at least with no breaks yet many aircraft no trails at all ?
 
I see plenty of trails drifting towards Florida at about 80kts over the GoMEX on the visible loop.

Are all those jets at the same altitude?
Have you made any attempt to identify the planes?
 
I thought the chemtrail believers said there were 'spray planes' with tanks and nozzles... So why would it be in the jet fuel?

And if it is in the jet fuel, then just buy some jet fuel? No? Or get friendly with someone who works as ground-crew in an airport and he can sample some of the spilt fuel (of which there is a lot!) and it can be tested. Jesus.
 
If I was looking for subject matter to complete a doctoral dissertation for psychology, I'd pick Jim...and the chemtrail community.

This thread is all over the map!
 
justanairlinepilot said:
If I was looking for subject matter to complete a doctoral dissertation for psychology, I'd pick Jim...and the chemtrail community. This thread is all over the map!
Click to expand...
You would be if
a) you didn't understand altitude
b) you didn't understand perspective
c) you didn't understand how aircraft engines work
d) you didn't understand how aircraft fly
e) you haven't the faintest clue what clouds are made of

I'm tired now... :)
 
3.4.1 Fuel sulphur contentSulphur plays an integral role in the contrail formation process, facilitating water
nucleation on soot particles and providing volatile particles serving as condensation
nuclei. A reduction of the fuel sulphur content would reduce the emission of SO3
and H2SO4, and have an impact on the aerosol density in the plume and contrail
precursor activation. It would be technically possible to reduce the fuel sulphur
content. However, reducing the fuel content might have no or only a very little
impact on contrail formation as mentioned in section 2.1.2. Water nucleation on
soot particles is believed to be independent of the presence of sulphur species in
the plume [Popovitcheva et al., 2001]. And even if sulphur free fuel led to the
absence of volatile particles and avoided water nucleationon soot particles, ambient
background particles would still provide sufficient condensation nuclei. Contrails
formed on background particles, however, would very likely be composed of fewer
but larger ice particles, which because of their radiative properties could result in
a lower positive radiative forcing. The impact of contrails with fewer but larger
particles on contrail cirrus formation has not been investigated up to now.
Click to expand...
PDF https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/2966/1/Noppel%202007.pdf
 
Did Joe read past this part in the abstract?

And even if sulphur free fuel led to the
absence of volatile particles and avoided water nucleationon soot particles, ambient
background particles would still provide sufficient condensation nuclei.
Click to expand...
 
Pete said:
Do you even need to read all of it? You don't look like someone who will budge no matter how much scientifically accurate material they read.
Click to expand...
Look Like ? Or act Like ? Stubborn me ? Maybe? but not blind to the truth . Its been a year for me on this form and nobody has successfully convinced me otherwise . I have learned quite a bit but still have my own opinion on what I believe . Its actually 150 pages so not done yet . It will take me a few days with my busy workload .
 
Just to be clear - what is your position/opinion/belief that no-one has convinced you otherwise about??
 
MikeC said:
Just to be clear - what is your position/opinion/belief that no-one has convinced you otherwise about??
Click to expand...
On geoengineering . whether or not it is happening . Thats pretty much my Only so called conspiracy . IMO of course
 
Jazzy said:
OK. 0.003 grams is 0.000003 Kg. A litre of avgas weighs 0.8 Kg, so 0.8/0.000003 makes the proportion 1 : 267,000.

That's what I do. Be jealous. :)
Click to expand...

an interesting post by Matt McInnes at Australians against chemtrails. The ballast tanks on aircraft photos are now disinformation. He knows what they are really for and pours scorn on some usual suspects like Madison Moonstar.. ( not that that is difficult).

i don't think he has read this thread though.... Because he has made a fool of himself yet again.

External Quote:
A timely reminder about disinformation concerning chemtrails on the internet. Please 'like' this so more people read it, and hopefully get the message once and for all.

A number of photos still circulate the internet, particularly on Facebook, of plane refueling and ballast systems, purported to be "chemtrail tanks". This is an internet myth originally put out by unscrupulous people who want to paint activists as uneducated, and thus dismiss the overwhelming evidence that geoengineering, weather control and chemtrail agendas are scientific and historical fact. These ballast systems are for testing the weight/balance of planes. Using such photos as "evidence of chemtrails" continues to do a great disservice to activists, as they are easily proven as part of the regular testing regime of aircraft. Disinfo artists and internet fools such as 'Madistonstar Moon' who have apparently no formal education whatsoever and just "make stuff up" should be called out for what they are.


Let me briefly explain the modern methods of chemtrails, that are factually supported, and why I believe separated tanks to be unnecessary, and even hazardous and a "dead giveaway", to the point where it should be considered they are no longer commonly used at all.
Modern chemtrails in DOMESTIC craft are more than likely achieved through the JP-8 jet fuel additive Stadis 450. There are several other variations also. Many safety sheets from the aviation industry will not include that it is, in fact, barium salt.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/139917532/Stadis-450-DINNSA-Barium-Salt-Aviation-Fuel-Additive <- right there in black and white for you guys. Fuel tanks (types) may be changed at altitude. Also search "biofuel alumina nanoparticle" which is unfortunately what we are heading towards. When a flight climbs above around, let's say 31,000ft, there is always condensation (even though you can't see it) whereby the oxidation (burning of fuel) will produce a thicker chemtrail (due to additives) for whatever purpose (SRM, conductivity) due to the specific properties of the aerosols (Föppl et al., 1966; Prenatt et al., 1969; Lüst, 2002).
MILITARY craft only need an oxidation disk at point of combustion as you see in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrvK30Gzh_0 . <- single or twin jet engine system. These craft do not have the sufficient space that would allow for extra tanks.
Military craft more than likely use outlets for a full wing spray via oxidation disks. They may even still use tanks in some older models, which has been evidenced recently by military whistleblowers in the United States, and may also be the case in the planes that C.A.S.A. refuse to identify here, some of which appear to be decommissioned airliners and former active-duty military planes.


Regardless, evidence shows that no tanks are needed. Patents demonstrate this, with the more recent patents not mentioning tanks at all. This explains why domestic pilots and service crews in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other places have investigated their planes and found no tanks following the beginning of the modern chemtrail phenomenon. The pilots who could not account for the massive plumes now trailing for hundreds of kilometres behind their craft, and yet have been unable to locate the tanks and ducted systems required, a "dead giveaway", now have a much more simple and scientifically parsimonious explanation to investigate. I encourage everyone involved to continue researching these avenues further and sharing facts rather than hearsay and falsehoods.


Matt
Awake Australia & Australians Against Chemtrails
14Share
 
External Quote:
This is an internet myth originally put out by unscrupulous people who want to paint activists as uneducated,...
Can the first appearance of this photo used as chemtrail evidence be traced?
What's the bet it was an uneducated activist and not an unscrupulous double agent.
 
They will still say it was a 'double agent'. Any time they get caught in a lie, they tend to blame some 'disinfo' agent, instead of manning up and admitting that they were wrong.
 
William Thomas has admitted he was wrong to claim ethylene dibromide is part of jet fuel. He also claims to have done a lab analysis of jet fuel, but has never shown the results.

You folks asking here about what is in jet fuel should hold your own people accountable. You could even say that William Thomas is guilty of a conspiracy to withhold information from you, because he made these claims for a very long time, and has withheld this lab analysis from you for well over a decade.

Who will stand up for the truth among you chemtrails advocates besides me in calling for Thomas to release everything he has claimed to have?

That would include his claim to have "hundreds" of photo-identifiable USAF tankers spraying out of their tail booms, many more lab analyses, and the identity of multiple air traffic controllers who could testify about chemtrails. If all of this were true, why has Thomas kept his vital information about an alleged "Crime Against Humanity" under wraps for well over a decade?

A. He is making stuff up.
B. He has exaggerrated in some way.
C. He is part of the problem.

link to his admissions:
https://www.metabunk.org/posts/46652
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Someone posted in this thread that they thought Jazzy may have been me. . I was giving Russell Tanner a hard time a few months ago. Jazzy must be an asshole.. Haha
 
Jazzy said:
That had better be a nervous laugh.
Click to expand...

Well I'm really not sure if I'm flattered or not. But I was definitely being an asshole.

I told him that I confessed to being a govt employee and that I was going to "spray the fuck out of Bangor Maine tomorrow " - Ha accused me of being one of "Mick West's cronies", selectively deleted my posts and blocked me ... So I looked up Mick and signed up here.

Great page, but why it so bad on mobile? It's really slow.
 
Last edited:
Jay Uzi said:
Someone posted in this thread that they thought Jazzy may have been me. . I was giving Russell Tanner a hard time a few months ago. Jazzy must be an asshole.. Haha

I told him that I confessed to being a govt employee and that I was going to "spray the fuck out of Bangor Maine tomorrow " - Ha accused me of being one of "Mick West's cronies", selectively deleted my posts and blocked me ... So I looked up Mick and signed up here.
Click to expand...

A hollow propaganda victory for the believers in the end, to my mind.

Those incorrectly attributed comments now have a life of their own, and are touted around the chemtrails believers online in an attempt to discredit both Metabunk generally and some users specifically, used to confirm the bias of those who've fallen for the hoax who might otherwise use this website to learn some facts.

Just goes to show the unintended consequences of trolling, sadly. It pays to be careful with those who've bought into these kind of theories.
 
Last edited:
There used to be a YT website called JazzrocIsASpook claiming me to be a team of dozens of people. It was populated by dozens of the deluded. They rummaged through my writings looking for confirmation of their delusion. They apparently found it. That was five years ago. The site is empty now. I am a single individual, slightly more wrinkled these days. Alzheimers hasn't yet set in.
I still live in the same address. My old friends still exist in England. I still miss them. I only pick up news second-hand. My old dog has just died. My cat still bites me on a daily basis. I drink slightly less beer than I used to, but it still has the same effect. One of the few benefits of advancing years. :)
 
I have located a few videos which show airplane refueling. These should help to provide an antidote to the fear brough about by ignorance.

The claims that airplane fuel contains aluminum in sufficient mass to create a plume hundreds of miles long through additives would require hundreds of tons of aluminum to be incorporated into the fuel. Aluminum is a solid substance and would be visible. This video shows how fuel trucks have a sump at the bottom to collect foreign matter, dirt, metal, or water. The sumps are checked regularly by the refueling operators as shown, and foreign material would be seen. The fuel operator would be derelict in his duties to allow contamination of any kind, and be responsible for a crash if he did so:


This video shows the fuel operator taking sump samples, doing a visual check to see that the fuel is "clear and bright", and some simple field tests both from the truck and at the tanks. This is a serious and very responsible job performed continuously thousands of times daily worldwide.


Furthermore, the airplanes themselves have sumps on their tanks, and visual checks are also made of these, as seen at 2:20 in this video. The video shows in detail fuel procedures including the fact that fuel is metered into this plane by weight, not gallons. Weight is used because stability of the plane is very important and stability depends on the weight of fuel. Pilots know what weight to expect and how far a given weight will take the plane. If a large mass of aluminum or other substance were added to the fuel, it would decrease the plane's range and be noticeable. Unusual trim conditions caused by unusual weight of fuel would also be an indication of problems. Fueling an airplane is a serious matter, because the pilot wants to live through the flight. Running out of fuel or carrying sub-quality fuel is not like spending some time on the side of the road or calling for roadside assistance, it is a matter of life or death for the pilot and passengers as well as the job of every person in the fuel supply chain. Risking safety by putting off quality fuel into an airplane is simply not an option.


Fuel additives such as Prist or Stadis 450 are sometimes claimed to create "chemtrails". Prist prevents icing of fuel in case small amounts of water form in fuel tanks which could possibly freeze and block fuel lines. It is added at the extremely low rate of 0.1 to 0.15% of the fuel volume(~1 gal. per 1000 gal.) by metering from a small container during fueling as seen at 1:50 during this video. Stadis 450 prevents fire producing sparks from happening in fuel system components, and is added at a MUCH lower rate of 0.00013%:


I hope this puts some perspective on these claims. Readers should be aware that this sort of information is not being shown inside the chemtrails believer camps because the leadership prefers that their followers not know the whole story, thus maintaining the hype of fear and eliciting an emotional rather than a factual response.
 
HappyMonday said:
A hollow propaganda victory for believers in the end, to my mind.

Those incorrectly attributed comments now have a life of their own, and are touted around the chemtrails believers online in an attempt to discredit both Metabunk generally and some users specifically, used to confirm thoughtss of those who've fallen for the hoax who might otherwise use this website to learn some facts.

Just goes to show the unintended consequences of trolling, sadly. It pays to be careful with those who've bought into these kind of theories.
Click to expand...

The circle continues. When dealing with irrational people, so is the consequence.

Metabunk will be a target for believers. Any strong opposition will have the finger pointed back here. The page speaks for itself. If the has a reputation for being a troll factory, I don't know, but if it does, I didn't create that.

I'm not disagreeing with what you say, but it's the nature of the beast.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Starflint
Shaanxi Province, China - Strange sounds and sightings recorded on surveillance
Replies
10
Views
643
deirdre
deirdre
Mick West
Errors in Luis Elizondo's UFO Book "Imminent"
4 5 6
Replies
219
Views
22K
Ann K
Ann K
John J.
Is "Improved Instrumental Techniques...", Nolan, Vallee, Jiang, Lemke 2022 a useful paper?
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
Z.W. Wolf
Z.W. Wolf
NorCal Dave
Claim: The Plasmoid Unification Model (PUM) of Malcolm Bendall provides "free energy".
2
Replies
77
Views
38K
NorCal Dave
NorCal Dave
Mick West
Reverse Engineering the ATFLIR to find Range and Temp to/of the Gimbal UAP
2
Replies
53
Views
21K
FatPhil
FatPhil

Latest posts

Trending content

Back
Top