A timely reminder about disinformation concerning chemtrails on the internet. Please 'like' this so more people read it, and hopefully get the message once and for all.
A number of photos still circulate the internet, particularly on Facebook, of plane refueling and ballast systems, purported to be "chemtrail tanks". This is an internet myth originally put out by unscrupulous people who want to paint activists as uneducated, and thus dismiss the overwhelming evidence that geoengineering, weather control and chemtrail agendas are scientific and historical fact. These ballast systems are for testing the weight/balance of planes. Using such photos as "evidence of chemtrails" continues to do a great disservice to activists, as they are easily proven as part of the regular testing regime of aircraft. Disinfo artists and internet fools such as 'Madistonstar Moon' who have apparently no formal education whatsoever and just "make stuff up" should be called out for what they are.
Let me briefly explain the modern methods of chemtrails, that are factually supported, and why I believe separated tanks to be unnecessary, and even hazardous and a "dead giveaway", to the point where it should be considered they are no longer commonly used at all.
Modern chemtrails in DOMESTIC craft are more than likely achieved through the JP-8 jet fuel additive Stadis 450. There are several other variations also. Many safety sheets from the aviation industry will not include that it is, in fact, barium salt.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/139917532/Stadis-450-DINNSA-Barium-Salt-Aviation-Fuel-Additive <- right there in black and white for you guys. Fuel tanks (types) may be changed at altitude. Also search "biofuel alumina nanoparticle" which is unfortunately what we are heading towards. When a flight climbs above around, let's say 31,000ft, there is always condensation (even though you can't see it) whereby the oxidation (burning of fuel) will produce a thicker chemtrail (due to additives) for whatever purpose (SRM, conductivity) due to the specific properties of the aerosols (Föppl et al., 1966; Prenatt et al., 1969; Lüst, 2002).
MILITARY craft only need an oxidation disk at point of combustion as you see in this video -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrvK30Gzh_0 . <- single or twin jet engine system. These craft do not have the sufficient space that would allow for extra tanks.
Military craft more than likely use outlets for a full wing spray via oxidation disks. They may even still use tanks in some older models, which has been evidenced recently by military whistleblowers in the United States, and may also be the case in the planes that C.A.S.A. refuse to identify here, some of which appear to be decommissioned airliners and former active-duty military planes.
Regardless, evidence shows that no tanks are needed. Patents demonstrate this, with the more recent patents not mentioning tanks at all. This explains why domestic pilots and service crews in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other places have investigated their planes and found no tanks following the beginning of the modern chemtrail phenomenon. The pilots who could not account for the massive plumes now trailing for hundreds of kilometres behind their craft, and yet have been unable to locate the tanks and ducted systems required, a "dead giveaway", now have a much more simple and scientifically parsimonious explanation to investigate. I encourage everyone involved to continue researching these avenues further and sharing facts rather than hearsay and falsehoods.
Matt
Awake Australia & Australians Against Chemtrails
14Share