i don't think the binary order means anything. i think it is just random. i found a bunch of other binary patches and they all have different number layouts. i'm thinking now it is just random from the patch makers. ???
The chance of the 11001001 *not* being a Star Trek reference is about 1/8000 when you minimise assumptions.
Boring Information Theory follows:
Anyone jumping to the "no, it's 1/2^8 = 1/256 as there are 8 bits" conclusion is heading in the right direction, but the mere choice of 8 bits as the word length required another coincidence - it could have been any length - the chances of stopping exactly after the 8th bit are slim if the string was just coming out of a nozzle that randomly squirts out binary until it randomly stops (and you know nothing about what causes it to stop). To see this 1/8000 isn't far off, a naive approximation is to pretend such a nozzle has 3 outputs, 0, 1, and stopping, and then 3^8 gives you 1/6561, but that presupposes you know its chance of stopping at each step, a correct analysis does not make that assumption.
So, as another example, had the string been 10001110101, the chance of it *not* being a Clutch reference are about one in half a million (the 0,1,stop model giving 1/177147), rather than 1/2048 for it being 11 bits.
Oh, and for reference, the UTF-8 ramblings in the image
@Mendel embedded are basically just ramblings for the reason Mendel gave. The rest of the analysis was fine, just the UTF part. Presuming a string of 1s and 0s is decimal is a weird thing to do, so you wouldn't do it unless you had a reason, and no reason was given, so just don't do it.