U
Unregistered
Guest
Lots of things get "told" to congress - the fact that something gets told to congress does not mean it is true.
And they were NOT told "there will be martial law" - they were told there COULD be martial law - stop changing the story!!
Well whatever they were told, true or not and neither you or I was actually privvy to how it was phrased or delivered, it rattled them enough to pass the TARP. If a gang of youths tell you to give them your phone or you COULD wind up dead, I suspect you are likely to give them the phone! I suppose it could be defined as a THREAT or a WARNING, maybe even TERRORISM or BLACKMAIL, depending on how you choose to view it.
And it did not take a rocket scientist to be able to predict that things might degenerate that far - if the banking system collapsed there would be 10's of millions of unemployed Americans looking to take it out on someone.
that is called STATING THE BLEEDIN' OBVIOUS.
Or do you think the collapse of the US Banking system would have heralded a tiem of prosperity and peaceful co-existance among all mankind???
Actually, STATING THE BLEEDIN' OBVIOUS, there are 10's of millions of unemployed and homeless Americans, (millions without even basic sanitation or water, stuck in tent cities) looking to have people/Banksters/politicians held to account.
It is a matter of public record that the banking system did collapse, which is why we have the above scenario. The reason it collapsed was because Banksters robbed the people of their wealth through a complicated fraud. None of those guilty have been charged, despite syphoning off billions into shady accounts.
Also, AFAIK, congress had to authorise the $700 million because it involved the US Govt actually buying shares in the companies didn't it? teh Trilions of $$'s in loans did not invovle buying shares, and the increase in the money supply was already authorised by the QE legislation.
So, if the Fed, as evidenced by the 'imposed/forced Audit', only needed to loan the funds, which they had already been doing since 2007 at least and they could create the funds from thin air, why bother going to the huge trouble of buying shares through the highly tumultuous creation of TARP?
Sure the Feds didn't want the loans made public - but they were unable to keep them secret for very long at all. I don't know why they wanted them kept secret - but I find it ironic that you are blaming a Govt conspiracy for trying to keep the secret when it was a Govt ofice that revealed it!!
Without Ron Paul, this would still be entirely secret but fair enough you had the graciousness to accept they tried to keep it secret. Does that amount to a conspiracy? Can't be, this thread says clearly it is 'debunked'.
And they were NOT told "there will be martial law" - they were told there COULD be martial law - stop changing the story!!
Well whatever they were told, true or not and neither you or I was actually privvy to how it was phrased or delivered, it rattled them enough to pass the TARP. If a gang of youths tell you to give them your phone or you COULD wind up dead, I suspect you are likely to give them the phone! I suppose it could be defined as a THREAT or a WARNING, maybe even TERRORISM or BLACKMAIL, depending on how you choose to view it.
And it did not take a rocket scientist to be able to predict that things might degenerate that far - if the banking system collapsed there would be 10's of millions of unemployed Americans looking to take it out on someone.
that is called STATING THE BLEEDIN' OBVIOUS.
Or do you think the collapse of the US Banking system would have heralded a tiem of prosperity and peaceful co-existance among all mankind???
Actually, STATING THE BLEEDIN' OBVIOUS, there are 10's of millions of unemployed and homeless Americans, (millions without even basic sanitation or water, stuck in tent cities) looking to have people/Banksters/politicians held to account.
It is a matter of public record that the banking system did collapse, which is why we have the above scenario. The reason it collapsed was because Banksters robbed the people of their wealth through a complicated fraud. None of those guilty have been charged, despite syphoning off billions into shady accounts.
Also, AFAIK, congress had to authorise the $700 million because it involved the US Govt actually buying shares in the companies didn't it? teh Trilions of $$'s in loans did not invovle buying shares, and the increase in the money supply was already authorised by the QE legislation.
So, if the Fed, as evidenced by the 'imposed/forced Audit', only needed to loan the funds, which they had already been doing since 2007 at least and they could create the funds from thin air, why bother going to the huge trouble of buying shares through the highly tumultuous creation of TARP?
Sure the Feds didn't want the loans made public - but they were unable to keep them secret for very long at all. I don't know why they wanted them kept secret - but I find it ironic that you are blaming a Govt conspiracy for trying to keep the secret when it was a Govt ofice that revealed it!!
Without Ron Paul, this would still be entirely secret but fair enough you had the graciousness to accept they tried to keep it secret. Does that amount to a conspiracy? Can't be, this thread says clearly it is 'debunked'.