Prove it.
How do you want this to be proved: Simple, get on the plane, fly to South Africa and see with your own eyes.
With respect I am not sarcastic by saying this. (To make a video, well then it just get bashed like the original post)
This line alone is clearly nonsense.
If the input was "60% against output", then how would the machines be expensive? You would be getting 100/60 = 1.67 times as much energy out as you were putting in. That in itself would be a miracle and make you rich and famous, if it were true.
If they work, I assume your power bills are now zero?
Any evidence of this? Musk called his electric car company Tesla Motors, because the cars use an AC motor based on Tesla's design. It's a motor, which converts electricity into motion, with less than 100% efficiency. That's all. Musk certainly doesn't claim to have the secret of free energy.
Furthermore:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk#Tesla_MotorsExternal Quote:In 2014, Musk announced that Tesla Motors will allow its technology patents to be used by anyone in good faith in a bid to entice automobile manufacturers to speed up development of electric cars.
Trailblazer
You are correct, in theory 100/60 seem like a miracle.. Fact is in real time how do 100/25 sound.
Power bills. What is power bills?
Only Elon Musk can tell you if he acquired the actual tesla inventions. Now go look at the tesla battery and compare it to the POWER WALL battery that Elon Musk has now made available for distribution.
The electric car. When do you think the first one ever, was available. You are correct, early 1900
Note: Look careful at the things that Elon Musk are doing, he is one reason why NASA closed its doors. Yes they sponsor him (If I am not mistaking to the tune of 5 billion), but at a fraction of their original running cost. Look at Elon Musk's solar company, the products are very closely made to Tesla's designs.
I personally don't think that a lot of people in free energy schemes are intentional frauds, I think they just don't understand (or perhaps believe) the physics of AC current or Conservation of Energy. The former is fairly complicated and requires a working knowledge of the difference between a projection to the real axis vs the real-imaginary plane. The latter is, like it or not, a Law of this Universe. I think the approach many of the free energy believers tends to be more "religious" than scientific in nature.
They didn't "go" anywhere: here is a list of Tesla's patents with links to the patents themselves.External Quote:
David
I am not a free energy believer!! It has been done for many Years. Before the big energy companies in alliance with governments just stopped any forward movement.
Watch this space and also keep your eye on international news. The guy that nearly spent Ten Years to actually put this into full production already had his life threatened by our energy supplier. (He will not bend his knee)
The patents is the only thing that the world know off. (Well simple they are in the public domain) When Tesla's Lab was burned down when he did not want to bend his knees to powers at the time. Well all his designs was lost in the fire... MMMM so do people think, but yes that just about destroyed his will to start fresh.
Yes, I think a lot of them have the attitude that "We can go from 75% efficient to 90% efficient - we just need to get the same efficiency improvement again and we'll be over unity!"
Sadly it doesn't work like that.
Trailblazer
This from what we have has little to do with efficiency. Just plain simple out the box logic.
If you really want to see some unbelievable efficiency, look at some stuff NASA has achieved. I suppose you never heard of a bearing-less motor. The stuff is out there. Look around you in your every day life. 60 Years ago a 8 cylinder engine gave X amount output. Today a little 1300cc 4 cylinder make those ones look like midgets. That is efficiency.
OK now BASH me again (Just Please remember to keep this all in your minds. Remember the bashing)