To newcomers, the first two parts of the analysis of the sheriffs' report are on page 5. Ctrl-F "point by point".
If they made up the entire report, why would they add booze?
How do you know if he approved or not, or if he even had any say in the matter? Or even if he was home while they were drinking? Or if they drank at home? All you know is:
A) There was some booze in the house
B) The kids had been drinking
It does not unravel. You are just trying desperately to make something of nothing.
It didn't unravel for you, apparently, because you had already known that the kids, not the dad, had been drinking. You apparently had already understood that he did not approve of his kids smoking pot at all... certainly didn't share his with them, which you'd expect if he had approved of it. Since it's much safer to give your kids pot than to let them go out on their own and get it from who-knows-who. And to smoke it who-knows-where.
So what we see developing here is a crazed drug addicted mentally ill man who knew how to prevent his kids from getting into his stash.
And we wonder why the location of the booze wasn't specified because being ANYWHERE in the home would have been unusual. He kicked booze four years prior to the incident. Seanie (the mom) kicked opiates at around the same time.
Now where did the kids pick up the alcohol problem? "Angels camp the cave"?
But I really don't want to get into the mom's problems yet, and hopefully I never will. I'm counsel for Phillip's defense (posthumously). I am not prosecution (of Seanie who is still alive and probably grieving beyond endurance right now).
So if you see the Angle's Camp problem (for example why did Macaila have more alcohol and 'diphenhydramine??' in her tox results), perhaps we can keep it under our hat, and just open our minds to the 'defense' part of this situation.
I'm not holding her hostage in the debate (for anyone who might pick up this note). I'm just saying, I fully intend to show the world the truth about Phillip Marshall himself.
Even dead guys deserve a defense.
Amendment 6.
In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,
by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Compulsory process. Counsel for his defense. That's me.