Rep. Luna Requests UAP Video, With a List of Names.

[Todd Feinman]

Has he demonstrated that these unfamiliar objects are actually "craft"? We have seen everything from photo defects to butterflies misidentified. If a thing looks weird from his viewpoint, isn't he jumping to unwarranted conclusions when he decides what it is?

Ryan from Post-disclosure world discusses something that James Fox said Mellon told him, on Rogan (gads). And has some good clips of Grusch testifying and Mellon talking about satellite images:

Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=exSKmNTN62c&pp=ygUQNGsgdWZvIHNhdGVsbGl0ZdIHCQneCgGHKiGM7w%3D%3D&ra=m

 

[Ann K]

Ryan from Post-disclosure world discusses something that James Fox said Mellon told him, on Rogan (gads). And has some good clips of Grusch testifying and Mellon talking about satellite images:

I find the video singularly unimpressive. Grusch talks about the "overhead collection" - From satellites? Planes? He doesn't say. He says "I cannot explain them prosaically". Whoop-ti-doo.

Ryan wants to know if they're going "at velocities". He says if they have "velocities and shapes" they can tell if they're foreign or of "non-human origin". Scare-reverberations are employed to suggest the latter.

There's a statement that some things don't have exhaust, don't have wings, don't have a heat signature, but he just considers that to be mysterious, and doesn't draw the same conclusion as I do from that, that they are a lot closer and slower than he seems to think they are.

He admits that one organization disagrees with another organization, but desperately wants A to "admit" to the conclusions of B, rather than the reverse.

 

[Todd Feinman]

I find the video singularly unimpressive. Grusch talks about the "overhead collection" - From satellites? Planes? He doesn't say. He says "I cannot explain them prosaically". Whoop-ti-doo.

Ryan wants to know if they're going "at velocities". He says if they have "velocities and shapes" they can tell if they're foreign or of "non-human origin". Scare-reverberations are employed to suggest the latter.

There's a statement that some things don't have exhaust, don't have wings, don't have a heat signature, but he just considers that to be mysterious, and doesn't draw the same conclusion as I do from that, that they are a lot closer and slower than he seems to think they are.

He admits that one organization disagrees with another organization, but desperately wants A to "admit" to the conclusions of B, rather than the reverse.

That's where it's at now. We will have to see what happens. You certainly want more material to try and debunk; it's your ikigai.
I'm enjoying watching Burchett and Burlison being interviewed, Dagnabit! Burlison has a look on his face like he just came through a portal, and Burchett has a wild look in his eyes. Luna keeps her cool but looks discombobulated.

 

[MapperGuy]

There's a statement that some things don't have exhaust, don't have wings, don't have a heat signature, but he just considers that to be mysterious, and doesn't draw the same conclusion as I do from that, that they are a lot closer and slower than he seems to think they are.

A meteor before it hits the atmosphere would have no exhaust, no wings and no heat signature. Many missiles, after their solid rocket motor burns out, would have no exhaust and no wings and be flying at high speed.
Having check-lists of characteristics can be helpful, but not everything you see is going to have all of the items listed, may not have any of them. The system performing the observation may or may not be able to detect some even if they are present.
The idea that members of congress, mostly lawyers, are going to perform analysis of images or video is stretching things a bit. They will be dependent on what information they are provided by whomever is showing them the images.

The idea that everyone has a right to know about classified programs sounds good as a sound bite. But how do you inform the American public without also informing the Russian and Chinese publics at the same time.

And finally, people talk about their need to know, on subjects where there is really only a WANT to know.