Rep. Luna Requests UAP Video, With a List of Names.

Death and life are part of the order of things. Suffering is part of life. I don't know we are ready for any big advances; we're pretty much ruining the planet. I'd just watch us from a distance. Might be concerned if one idiot species was going to destroy everything with their stupid missiles and stop that. I'd actually work on trying to make a good portion of humanity sterile with some engineered virus to keep things in balance for the other animals on the planet if I was going down that route!
 
You shouldn't assume that there is something to "inform the American public" about, in this regard. Various entities within the government have publicly stated that no, there is nothing to tell, no, there are no crashed UFOs in custody, and no, there are no otherworldly bodies in cold storage at Wright-Pat. But the people who want to believe otherwise refuse to be convinced, and are demanding "disclosure" when there may be nothing to disclose.

With respect to ALIENS I am quite sure there is nothing to disclose, no crashed saucers, no dead aliens, or live ones. Nobody here but us Humans.

But in their zeal the Disclosure people will try and get things released that might reveal the intel communities souces and methods, those fuzzy videos and photos, things like that that don't really disclose anything but which they want people to see so they can "make up their own minds".
 
With respect to ALIENS I am quite sure there is nothing to disclose, no crashed saucers, no dead aliens, or live ones. Nobody here but us Humans.

But in their zeal the Disclosure people will try and get things released that might reveal the intel communities souces and methods, those fuzzy videos and photos, things like that that don't really disclose anything but which they want people to see so they can "make up their own minds".
What the heck is going on in the SCIFs? Some people say they have seen these things close enough to see them pretty clearly --so perhaps not in LIZ --so they must be lying or just mistaken?
 
What the heck is going on in the SCIFs? Some people say they have seen these things close enough to see them pretty clearly --so perhaps not in LIZ --so they must be lying or just mistaken?
How highly would you rate Rep. Luna's ability to recognize something mundane but unfamiliar to her as something mundane, when she has the alternative of believing it to be evidence supporting a strongly held prior opinion? (Not picking on her exclusively, I could ask the same of Rep. Burchett or several others. In fact, I hereby do so! ^_^)

And a wonderful side-advantage of showing them in a SCIF and insisting they are too sensitive to be shown anywhere else is that people who are actually good at recognizing this stuff can't see it and spoil the fun by saying, "Wait, it's a butterfly*" or balloon or Starlink flare or...

*It is worth noting that a picture of a butterfly was touted as the "smoking gun" UFO image, with appendages projecting and a visible "field" and lasers and stuff. None of that was actually visible in the photo -- butterflies do not have laser nor do they generate visible energy fields, and while they DO have appendages these were not visible in the photo. "I aw pictures/videos of something that is definitely a structured craft made with out-of-this-world super technology" has zero value without the ability to put more eyes on it, just in case it is totally wrong and just a butterfly... https://www.metabunk.org/threads/cl...-photo-of-orb-captured-by-photographer.13182/
 
Right, if you listen to what they say, now including Steve Scalise, they are so vague it seems like the videos might be in the LIZ, and because they looking for unexplainable things, they were given the butterflies. Some are more surprised and definitive, like Luna, but I also wouldn't consider these folks to be able to debunk UFO butterflies much, anyway. It's all kind of getting to be farcical. I wish we could put a bunch of them under oath.
 
Back
Top