electrojet
New Member
Greetings.
It is a great night. Good to have a little time to post about the science of weather modification.
Hi Lotek. This thread has already provided much evidence that HAARP modifies weather. This a debunking forum and it's all good and par for the course. The documents speak clearly for the importance of vertical coupling processes, a dynamic system and transmitter facilities modifying the weather.
The starting point is from the link to the EISCAT Job posting that is necessarily examined one more time.
Buoyancy waves 101. http://www.atoptics.co.uk/highsky/hgrav.htm
This link http://www.psfc.mit.edu/library1/catalog/reports/2000/09rr/09rr001/09rr001_full.pdf illustrates 2 ways in which transmitter arrays modify gravity waves. The most obvious way is that acoustic gravity waves are excited by HAARP. This excitation is delineated from the concurrent auroral event. AGW's are differentiated from IGW's by their frequency signature. Maybe it is just me, but the enthusiasm is palpable and it exudes from the conclusion that their experiment produced notable local effects that were clearly separate from the solar stream and include acoustic wave "excitation" large plasma sheet creation and magnetic field fluctuations. Definition of excitation anyone, in science that is increasing the potential or energy pretty much, right?
The second way that atmospheric heaters change gravity waves is that they create a large plasma sheet or an artificial duct. This affects wave turning at the boundary layer. It is at this point that waves can reflect, become evanescent, dissipate or become entrained in the duct. Since the duct is artificially formed, the gravity wave is also changed artificially. ANY of these results is going to effect gravity wave breaking.
I think that this paper is one that discusses wave turning, if not let me know and I will insert the link that does instead. http://www.geo.uni-frankfurt.de/iau/ThMet/pdf/achatz2005.pdf
Previously I posted a link to a website from someone who claimed that transmitter facilities can create gravity waves. I immediately began looking for other support of this statement from more legitimate sources. I am still looking to open a few abstracts and translate some other papers and will post it here. At this time, the evidence is that HAARP modifies gravity waves and "excites" acoustic gravity waves. This is based upon the heating capabilities of HAARP and other transmitters, based upon the demonstrated upwelling of both the lower side of the ionosphere and the topside, and based upon the plasma sheets, artificial mirrors and sustained plasma balls. I am increasingly confident that the eccentric source is correct.
In reviewing the Fritts Alexander 03 paper, the authors state that a complete survey of Mid altitude gravity waves is outside the scope of their report and it mentions the standard sources and
This is an excerpt of an artificially induced upwelling. There are full papers available on this capability through the internet and I think I previously linked one on upwelling. http://www.researchgate.net/publica...rtificial_ionospheric_ion_upwelling_at_EISCAT
This link is an examination of the of gravity waves that may be caused by a seismic source. Joule heating that perturbs the ionosphere and causes gravity waves. http://www.ss.ncu.edu.tw/~jyliu/paper/2006076.pdf If you do not think that this is related, just look at the airglow above these events and compare the artificial airglows from transmitters as a starting comparison.
Here Joule heating via the aurora is indicated as creating gravity waves. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<0210:OTROJH>2.0.CO;2
In summary. HAARP does influence gravity wave breaking. This alone is sufficient to alter localized weather, large scale weather and even climatic systems.
The evidence for creation of gravity waves increasingly appears to be right in front of all our faces in the forms of 1) creation of a new large plasma field / ducting. 2) Causing upwelling by heating and creating sustained artificial plasmas and plasma mirrors.
There is a LOT more scientific evidence that heaters are modifying the weather or even influencing climatic circulation.
The revelation for me is the avalanche of scientific papers detailing the vertical coupling between atmospheric layers. The claim that gravity wave breaking effects weather / climate is not limited to the EISCAT job posting, it is all over the research. I am more than happy to spam out the links here if anyone wants more of them.
I will stick with the gravity wave and wave breaking for a while, but I am really looking forward to discussing avalanching energy, and tapping into some other transmitter capabilities.
Bryan
“Do all the good you can. By all the means you can. In all the ways you can. In all the places you can. At all the times you can. To all the people you can. As long as ever you can.”
― John Wesley
It is a great night. Good to have a little time to post about the science of weather modification.
Hi Lotek. This thread has already provided much evidence that HAARP modifies weather. This a debunking forum and it's all good and par for the course. The documents speak clearly for the importance of vertical coupling processes, a dynamic system and transmitter facilities modifying the weather.
The starting point is from the link to the EISCAT Job posting that is necessarily examined one more time.
Solrey had mentioned that the higher up in the atmosphere the less density there is. The key aspect with regards to gravity waves at 50-90km is their amplitude, energy/energy potential as well as the molecular changes that occur at these heights. More than one paper that I have read discuss the wave breaking as violent. Also, the reason I implore multiple readings of the above job posting is because of the energy transfer that is both upwards and downwards (as the breaking of waves relationship to down welling in the polar vortex.)Breaking of waves in the mesosphere (~50-90 km altitude) drives the pole-to pole circulation that links the cold summer mesopause and the strong down-welling that occurs in the polar vortex in the winter hemisphere. This downward motion is a potentially important part of the process by which solar activity can influence regional climate, via the transport of ozone-destroying chemical species following geomagnetic activity. WACCM (Whole Atmosphere Coupled Community Model) simulations have suggested that a change in the altitude of gravity wave breaking effects the peak meridional circulation, the vertical transport of important chemical constituents and their mixing ratios. Gravity waves that penetrate into the thermosphere influence the density of ionosphere and may have an upward impact on geomagnetic storms and the resultant space weather effects. Other sources of gravity waves in middle and upper atmosphere in the Polar Regions are the polar vortex itself and the geomagnetic activity.
Buoyancy waves 101. http://www.atoptics.co.uk/highsky/hgrav.htm
This link http://www.psfc.mit.edu/library1/catalog/reports/2000/09rr/09rr001/09rr001_full.pdf illustrates 2 ways in which transmitter arrays modify gravity waves. The most obvious way is that acoustic gravity waves are excited by HAARP. This excitation is delineated from the concurrent auroral event. AGW's are differentiated from IGW's by their frequency signature. Maybe it is just me, but the enthusiasm is palpable and it exudes from the conclusion that their experiment produced notable local effects that were clearly separate from the solar stream and include acoustic wave "excitation" large plasma sheet creation and magnetic field fluctuations. Definition of excitation anyone, in science that is increasing the potential or energy pretty much, right?
The second way that atmospheric heaters change gravity waves is that they create a large plasma sheet or an artificial duct. This affects wave turning at the boundary layer. It is at this point that waves can reflect, become evanescent, dissipate or become entrained in the duct. Since the duct is artificially formed, the gravity wave is also changed artificially. ANY of these results is going to effect gravity wave breaking.
I think that this paper is one that discusses wave turning, if not let me know and I will insert the link that does instead. http://www.geo.uni-frankfurt.de/iau/ThMet/pdf/achatz2005.pdf
Previously I posted a link to a website from someone who claimed that transmitter facilities can create gravity waves. I immediately began looking for other support of this statement from more legitimate sources. I am still looking to open a few abstracts and translate some other papers and will post it here. At this time, the evidence is that HAARP modifies gravity waves and "excites" acoustic gravity waves. This is based upon the heating capabilities of HAARP and other transmitters, based upon the demonstrated upwelling of both the lower side of the ionosphere and the topside, and based upon the plasma sheets, artificial mirrors and sustained plasma balls. I am increasingly confident that the eccentric source is correct.
cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/13105/InTech-Atmospheric_gravity_waves_and_effects_in_the_upper_atmosphere_associated_with_tsunamis.pdf
Atmospheric gravity waves are fluctuations of the neutral atmosphere, usually triggered by events that cause a lifting of localized regions of the atmosphere. In the lower atmosphere sources of gravity waves include severe weather systems (Georges, 1968), and winds blowing over mountains (Scorer, 1949). A
In reviewing the Fritts Alexander 03 paper, the authors state that a complete survey of Mid altitude gravity waves is outside the scope of their report and it mentions the standard sources and
from http://www.cora.nwra.com/~alexand/publications/FrittsAlexander03.pdfbody forcing accompanying localized wave dissipation, and wave-wave interactions. Less significant sources which may, nevertheless, be important at higher altitudes include auroral heating
This is an excerpt of an artificially induced upwelling. There are full papers available on this capability through the internet and I think I previously linked one on upwelling. http://www.researchgate.net/publica...rtificial_ionospheric_ion_upwelling_at_EISCAT
This link is an examination of the of gravity waves that may be caused by a seismic source. Joule heating that perturbs the ionosphere and causes gravity waves. http://www.ss.ncu.edu.tw/~jyliu/paper/2006076.pdf If you do not think that this is related, just look at the airglow above these events and compare the artificial airglows from transmitters as a starting comparison.
Here Joule heating via the aurora is indicated as creating gravity waves. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<0210:OTROJH>2.0.CO;2
In summary. HAARP does influence gravity wave breaking. This alone is sufficient to alter localized weather, large scale weather and even climatic systems.
The evidence for creation of gravity waves increasingly appears to be right in front of all our faces in the forms of 1) creation of a new large plasma field / ducting. 2) Causing upwelling by heating and creating sustained artificial plasmas and plasma mirrors.
There is a LOT more scientific evidence that heaters are modifying the weather or even influencing climatic circulation.
The revelation for me is the avalanche of scientific papers detailing the vertical coupling between atmospheric layers. The claim that gravity wave breaking effects weather / climate is not limited to the EISCAT job posting, it is all over the research. I am more than happy to spam out the links here if anyone wants more of them.
I will stick with the gravity wave and wave breaking for a while, but I am really looking forward to discussing avalanching energy, and tapping into some other transmitter capabilities.
Bryan
“Do all the good you can. By all the means you can. In all the ways you can. In all the places you can. At all the times you can. To all the people you can. As long as ever you can.”
― John Wesley