Syria UAP 2021- Apparent Instantaneous Acceleration

[jdog]

Hah, I forgot I made this video talking about my balloon experiment.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snwqUpQ6oSE

Missed an opportunity to say, "Upon reflection, I recalled I made this video..."

 

[Nemon]

This case is obviously this one now released with the second batch as

DOW-UAP-PR051

https://www.war.gov/UFO/#DOW-UAP-PR051-Syrian-UAP-instant-acceleration

I wonder how it's redacted now though it's been already published by Corbell unredacted.

 

[JMartJr]

Interesting how the clouds are flowing through the frame constantly from right to left, until right when the "UFO" zips out of frame, when they slow right down. Almost as if the camera is following the UFO, then stops doing that so the UFO exits the right of the screen.

This is all consistent with the object flying along at a constant rate of speed (or a constant apparent speed produced by a moving camera and parallax for an essentially stationary object like a balloon). There is no observable evidence of acceleration in either case, instantaneous or otherwise!

Yet somebody in DoD is releasing this as an object flying in an anomalous fashion. This raises some ominous and unavoidable questions about the competence of some number of folks at DoD -- hopefully the number is small, and limited to either folks who Want To Believe or who Want To Mollify Congressional Members Who Want To Believe.

 

[Mick West]

The segment in question

The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases, you can actually see the interlacing artifacts, so it's much closer to the original, and you can see:

he clouds are flwoing through the frame constantly from right to left, until right when the "UFO" zips out of frame, when they slow right down. Almost as if the camera is following the UFO, then stops doing that so the UFO exits the right of the screen.

Which is also what the Sitrec analysis shows.

 

[Nemon]

The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases

Do you think that this 'official' version has not been filmed off a monitor?

 

[Mick West]

Do you think that this 'official' version has not been filmed off a monitor?

I think it's the original footage, just reencoded, so not filmed off a monitor. The various contrast issues are problems with the original IR camera.

 

[benplace]

You are correct in that the camera is following the object and when the "instantaneous acceleration" happens, the camera just stops following it and pans straight up.

 

[TheCholla]

It seems that the official release has a few more seconds to it, with another change of mode and extended view.
Would be interesting to check if the object should be in the frame then (and if it can be found).

 

[Mick West]

It seems that the official release has a few more seconds to it, with another change of mode and extended view.
Would be interesting to check if the object should be in the frame then (and if it can be found).

It (visually) traverses hald the most zoomed-in screen in 6 frames, so 12 frames for, let's call it an "1a" screen . leaving at 8562
30 frames later, without the view moving much, the view widens to 2a
70 frames after that it zooms out another 2a to 4a, over those 70 frames it pans maybe 1.5 of the 2a screen, or 3 1a screens
at 8841, we widen to 8a
at 8907, we go to what looks like 6x that, so 48a
8907-8562 = 345 frames, so it would have traversed 345/12, or about 28 1a screens, which is more than half of the wide 48a screen, so it would seems like it would be off screen.

 

[Mick West]

It seems that the official release has a few more seconds to it

Some perhaps more interesting few seconds, are from frames 5784 (3:11.10) to 7352 (4:05.07), nearly a minute of video missing from Corbell's leak, in which the object appears to turn around, in much the same way as the windmill object does. The OSD here would, I strongly suspect, show that it matches the camera platform (the drone) turning around, and hence showing that the motion was parallax. I wonder if Corbell had this segment, and why it was not included in the release.