The camera appears to be looking down towards the water. the objects are being manually tracked and seem like slow-moving targets with lots of parallax. I suspect it's either birds, balloons, or aliens.External Quote:
Those are waves we are seeing in the background? If so, wouldnt they be too small for balloons?
Probably waves, but it's hard to see their scale. They are over the ocean. But good point, an object cannot be bigger than its outline projected onto something behind it, so if those are regular waves then that's some indication of size.
The drone (i.e. the camera platform drone). It is not locked onto the target, so it knows nothing about it. Purely visual.
Correct, although that's not that relevant in calculating the altitude above the ocean. Any point would do.
Obviously birds do have "traditional populsion", there simply aren't enough pixels to see it. Also, Mick's stabilized footage reveals no "abrupt directional changes", the motion is rather fluid and organic.External Quote:
sounds to me like Elizondo. what was his thing called? aatip?
they are blobs. not dots.
On the not unreasonable assumption that a good many if not most of the orbs/dots might refer to "things too small to resolve the shape with any accuracy", those and lights account for 71.9% of the reports, by far the majority of them. If anyone really wants to investigate UAPs seriously, I'd expect to find a study of the remaining 28% (that is, the ones that are not in the LIZ) to be the more productive fraction.
Isn't that what we all want? Where can we find this 28% you speak of?
the government isn't interested in extraterrestrials. They are interested in chinese spy gadgets and technology our enemies might be cooking up. so they are going to continue to take a look at dots and blobs and verbal narratives only.
you have to pretend the bird blobs are important and need to be investigated because that's how you get more funding.
Compare:
Article: Cruise Control - Most waterfowl fly at speeds of 40 to 60 mph, with many species averaging roughly 50 mph. With a 50 mph tail wind, migrating mallards are capable of traveling 800 miles during an eight-hour flight. Studies of duck energetics show that a mallard needs to feed and rest for three to seven days to replenish the energy expended during this eight-hour journey.
Speed Record - The fastest duck ever recorded was a red-breasted merganser that attained a top airspeed of 100 mph while being pursued by an airplane. This eclipsed the previous speed record held by a canvasback clocked at 72 mph. Blue-winged and green-winged teal, thought by many hunters to be the fastest ducks, are actually among the slowest, having a typically flight speed of only 30 mph.
??? C'mon now, don't drop a phrase like that without further explanation.
Turns out that the merganser owed the pilot 50 bucks.??? C'mon now, don't drop a phrase like that without further explanation.
I think it's horizontal FOV, just labeled as FOR. It matches the target area width in relative scale.
A FOV value is the only thing that makes sense to me. Just not sure why it's labeled FOR.
>>> (17344 / 121) / ( 11771 / 82)
0.9985375179650786hfov = math.degrees(2 * math.atan((82/2)/11771))It could be easier to provide clarification if there is a specific question.
does noone on this forum remember what was said from comment to comment?! <i mean that in a 'it's cute' joking way this time.
ps i dont care about the sqrts, all i needed was the 14meters. <do you remember finding that?
The embedded timecode in this footage sometimes appears to freeze while the video keeps playing. Is this kind of glitch or discontinuity normal for these systems? I have not noticed anything like this in comparable videos so far, although I also did not really pay attention to it and it has not been a topic of discussion as far as I remember.
The entire video has likely been through several stages of re-recording, maybe on different systems. But the timecode does seem particularly bad.
