After someone posts not one, but several videos of a 24h antartic sun ...
and so on ...
Classic.
1 - Claims some evidence would put the matter to rest
2 - Is presented with such evidence
3 - Claims the evidence is fake
I believe if someone took the time to pay for a trip for you to be there, watching the 24h sun, you would claim you are in the wrong place, or drugged/hypnotized or whatever, right?
So, instead of talking about "opinion" of the video being fake, what about presenting evidence?
Also, what about the rest of the videos Mick posted? What about the real time webcam? What about the rest of the information in this thread? Are you going to keep talking about the sun that YOU THINK looks fake or the filmmaker that looks suspicious because he is a ... filmmaker?