No, I can not. But I can see gaps of four to six hours when no image was taken and/or included in that particular time-lapse. But the good thing about webcams is that you can follow them all day around to see for yourself that the sun does not set down in Antarctica at this time of the year. And if you need a 24-hour time-lapse, you can make one yourself by saving the images to your computer each time they are updated. This is easy.
I'm sure any true Scotsman would agree with you.
I'm not sure why you expect hundreds, but a quick search brought up quite a few nice examples. Here's a couple, have fun finding reasons to discount them
Ray Von
He doesn't care about what me or you think. He was not doing a film to prove Globe or Flat earth, he was doing a film about Antarctic, that happens to be in a Globe earth.
Which means that they might've been taken at different times, on different days, in different months, maybe across different years. The guy showing his watch might've been filmed after the time lapse was taken, and you'd never know.
The "entire sun size" isn't as big as it looks in the video. Most of what you're seeing is the flare of light from the sun. The sun may be a colossal star, but it's far enough away that it's visually fairly small in the sky. The wide angle probably exaggerates this illusion.
Meaning they looped the video.
Exactly.
Lots of TV shows are "faked". You have to get the shot that looks good and it's not always possible. If this was being presented as proof of a globe Earth, then yes, I agree it would be deceptive. But it does show what really happens, just not in a continuous shot. Most TV shows and movies aren't filmed in a continuous shot, either, you shoot one angle, then you move the cameras and you shoot it again. Then you edit together the best bits. All the stuff happened, just not necessarily in the order it is presented.
I think it cant be done.. because if you follow the sun on a flat earh map it goes away from a specific location on antarctica..
Thats why I think north pole is warmer than antarctica also..
I don't agree. The progression of the clouds seems to be smooth and consistent right through this section of the video, with no jump cut. I think it must be done at a time where there are no clouds around.
Watch again (preferably at 0.25 speed) and look at the other details, like the Sun position, smoke from chimneys etc.
1. There is no flat earth map.
2. That's not how the sun behaves, even on the hypothetical flat earth. See my post above for links to the actual shape of the sunlight cast by the 'flat earth sun'.
3. Agree with the first point - though I'd like to hear your definition of "a bit" - but as for the second point...that, I find hard to believe.
4. Not very often, true.
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...g-global-claims-record-polar-circumnavigationExternal Quote:
Those are different video segments shot at different times.
Not sure what video you are looking at, but I assume you mean something like:
Still not seeing it.
And done very cleverly, because I cannot find the join anywhere!
How can you see "people going backwards"? The interval between frames is approximately four minutes.
I think it is at about 1:15. Before that moment the clouds were retreating toward the Sun location, but after that they immediately turned back and charged toward the camera.
I just added some route diagrams for a couple of transpolar flights to my earlier post: they sure make you wonder what magic goes on down there.
I'd accept it. I'm not afraid to be wrong.
