Simulators mimic flight conditions of the aircraft in response to historically validated experiences . . . but does it simulate all conditions such as unsafe or not to exceed speeds and such things as fear, anxiety, anger, depression, of the pilot ??
Not significant.
It was something put out by pilots for 911 Truth. It was about a simulator for one of the airlines where the simulator training pilot asked those on the simulator if they wanted to see how easy or difficult it was to hit the towers. They also talked to him on a video. That video is here
I did read something about it a while back and don't have a link. It is the same thing discussed on the video.
So your opinion of a qualified senior pilots testimony is drivel . . . ?
No . . . the issue of why there was disagreement between some senior pilots in the videos and some of the participants here was never resolved to my knowledge it was just dropped . . .
There was disagreement . . . it was not resolved and cannot without investment in demonstration of capabilities . . . end of story.
I seriously doubt that we will see any legitimate attempts to demonstrate that the aircraft that hit the twin towers in the way observed were human controlled. The dynamic pressure on the aircraft, due to air pressure at or near sea level and the airspeeds involved, would have greatly magnified any little over steer and been too great to allow human control. The experienced airline pilots who tried and couldn't do it in a legitimate sophisticated flight simulator proves the point.
That is not the opinion of all the pilots who have commented on this Thread so far . . . the only pilots I know that have ventured a comment that it was impossible or beyond the capabilities of aircraft and minimally trained and experienced commercial pilots are in the posted videos from the 911 groups . . . it comes down to who do you believe . . .
I don't know of any pilots who have successfully hit the buildings in an airliner in a legitimate flight simulator at the airspeeds involved at or near sea level. Opinions by anonymous individuals claiming to be pilots don't count.
Who has personally told you they could not hit the buildings in a simulator?
It sounds like you didn't watch this video starting at 1:20 in
How would you know who here is actually a pilot let alone an airline pilot? I don't see anyone claiming to be a pilot who even gives their actual name let alone any proof of being a pilot.
Another theory could be remote controlled by computer aided telemetry targeting system . . . assumption is it aided the hijackers do their job . . .
Well. . . over the months of interaction one gets a feeling if someone is playing a game . . . . while I can not authenticate their credentials I am sure Mick could . . . can you rely on the credentials of the people (pilots) in the video in question?
Nobody is saying the passengers weren't on the plane. I am saying remote control was the most likely method of flying the planes to the target and that science shows it could not be neophyte pilot hijackers, as experienced airline pilots have a problem hitting the buildings at the speeds involved at sea level due to the extreme dynamic pressure.
It is most probably the only way it could have been done.
And you have the expertise to validate what you said . . . I don't . . . I am not an aeronautical engineer or scientist . . . ?
And that is the difficulty of the theory . . . there would have to have been a team of individuals modifying the avionics of the two types of airframes in advance of the hijacking . . . In what two or three different air depots . . .
When about 16 to 19 trillion in oil is at stake for those planning the event a few layers of technology don't seem significant. It isn't just an opinion that human control could not have been directing the planes to their targets. Science shows remote control with computer aided guidance was the only way the observed maneuvers were possible.
Your point is only supported by the experts in the video . . . do you have any other experts willing to support the concepts of limited human capability?
You say remote controll was the most likely method of control. These were commercial aircraft and the airlines know where they are at all times so I have some questions.
Yes that is accurate, I am incredulous that the planes were modified and wired to achieve this result.
So as I said before it comes down to who you believe . . . the personalities on the video or the experts here. . .
