The Varginha UFO

Aside from people on forums like this, no one wants better. Unfortunately.
I'm not so sure. Play a sci-fi movie from forty or fifty years ago, and the more sophisticated populace of today will break down in laughter. Eventually people catch on to how ridiculous the claims are. In general, people are less credulous than they once were. The internet and social media are quick to spread bunk, though, but I think they spread it to a more limited audience.
 
"Became."
In general, people are less credulous than they once were. The internet and social media are quick to spread bunk, though, but I think they spread it to a more limited audience.
That is not my impression at all, but I'm hoping very much that you are right.
 
This is the most compact debunk I could make of the event.

The Varginha Incident is often cited as Brazil's Roswell.
While layers of sensationalism are common in Ufology, this case might be a definite example.
When properly investigated, the grand conspiracy dissolves into a collection of misidentified local tragedies and a narrative built on the fragile, often coerced human testimony.

The initial spark was undeniably sincere.
On the afternoon of January 20, 1996, Valquíria Silva (14), Liliane Silva (16), and Kátia Xavier (22) were walking home through the Jardim Andere neighborhood when they encountered a strange, crouched "being" that paralyzed them with terror. They described a creature with oily, dark brown skin, pulsating veins, and three horn-like protrusions on a bulbous head. Most striking were its protruding red eyes, which stared with a frightened expression. The trio fled in a state of acute emotional distress, convinced they had seen the "devil". Such perception was possibly primed by both their religious faith and local folklore regarding a wealthy landowner, Zé Gomes, rumored to have practiced dark satanic rites, summoning demons on that very estate.

Despite intense social pressure and ridicule, these women have maintained the honesty of their experience for thirty years without ever seeking financial gain. However, sincerity does not equal accuracy. Later analysis suggests their perception was likely warped by the physical fatigue from work, walking in intense summer heat, and emotional distress from the threat of a possible rapist on their path; All pre-requisites for the possible culmination of a psychological phenomenon known as folie à deux, or shared delusion. Skeptics also point to a local resident named "Mudinho," who lived across from the lot and was frequently seen crouching in a posture that mirrored the witnesses' exact descriptions. The girls state they have known "Mudinho" since childhood, but brief misidentifications of even close family members are a known phenomenon. As spoken by the witnesses, they discussed the sighting as they walked home – possibly contaminating each other's memories of the traumatic experience.

As this sequence that began the incident displays, a complete belief in the Varginha Alien Narrative is completely dependent on not investigating it. It relies on the omission of these and several other events and logical contradictions, as appointed by its first and most renowned researcher.

Ubirajara Rodrigues (40), a respected lawyer and former believer in the paranormal, initially served as the primary intellectual enabler of the Varginha narrative by validating the three women's testimony. After being featured on a Rede Globo's nationwide show discussing the case, Rodrigues' involvement was fundamentally transformed on February 16, 1996. Vitório Pacaccini (33) presented him with an audio recording of a firefighter, Robson Luiz Oliveira, who allegedly witnessed the capture of a creature. This tape served as the "smoking gun" that convinced Ubirajara to move beyond the girls' sighting and aggressively pursue the military cover-up theory. The recording was kept secret by Vitório, only shown to those he deemed trustworthy. After the second Rede Globo's Fantástico show, a cacophony of third-hand accounts surged, growing increasingly sensational: a secret military operation deflagred by military witnesses, with their credentials verified by reputable journalists from Globo. Tales of a hospital blockade that no hospital staff had seen in the previous weeks, followed by an army convoy to a secret laboratory in another state; Reports of an alien autopsy performed by a famous doctor, and NORAD warnings of UFOs shot down by orbital lasers - all voiced by Pacaccini. The case appeared to be the "silver bullet" Ufologists worldwide were hoping for: confirmation that an international cover-up of extraterrestrial existence on Earth was real.

Eventually, the weight of the evidence collapsed. Ubirajara gradually distanced himself from the case and admitted that no extraordinary evidence ever existed. After his 2002 publication O Caso Varginha, where Rodrigues detailed his investigations and doubts about the veracity of the event, he published The Deconstruction of a Myth (2009), where he systematically criticized the lack of scientific methodology and the narrative fabrications that had come to define the case.
His former colleague, Vitório Pacaccini, had a very different perspective. Being the researcher who provided the source of all military testimony, he self-published his book "The Varginha Incident" in October 1996 in secrecy from his colleagues, catching them by surprise. It functions as a sensationalist authorial reconstruction that prioritizes speculative storytelling over scientific rigor, effectively factualizing unverified, indirect testimonies to engineer a military conspiracy narrative that would fit a corny X-Files episode perfectly.

As time passed, a significant escalation of the narrative can be observed.
Contemporary Newspaper articles and independent magazine investigations, nothing besides the initial fright by the girls was reported in those first eight weeks of 1996. No military blockades, no hospital off-limits, no aliens. The "UFO fever" grew as sensationalism slowly became accepted on prime time. The "wave of sightings" only occurred after the case was televised on a show with 60%+ nationwide viewership.

Decades after his testimony, the first military witnesses would admit that his original 1996 account was entirely fabricated and suborned by Pacaccini. When his statement was published in its entirety (against Pacaccini's and ufology's will), it was revealed that the Ufologist had systematically edited and "factualized" Robson's hesitant, indirect account into a categorical statement of capture, explaining why Vitório acted as a gatekeeper of said tape. Although all military accounts were already deemed doubtful due to several erroneous information and logistical contradictions, these witnesses also came forward stating they were bribed by Pacaccini. This same ufologist was accused by other military men of subornation attempts, as reported on the official army investigation back in 1996-1997.

The mysterious animal deaths that occurred at the Varginha Zoo in March 1996, which claimed the lives of four mammals, were attributed to a "total collapse of the immune system" by ufologist Vitório Pacaccini and nobody else. Necropsies revealed deep intestinal necrosis while the upper gastrointestinal tract remained preserved, a pattern characteristic of industrial poisoning from pH-activated toxins rather than an alien biological infection.

The media's constant reporting of the case generated a heightened suggestibility, which likely influenced Therezinha Clepf, who reported seeing a brown creature, wearing a golden 'tight-fitting cap' with luminescent red eyes on the zoo's restaurant veranda on the night of April 21, 1996. While she believed she encountered something extraordinary, the sighting is most plausibly explained as the misidentification of a local Barn Owl in the near-total darkness of the Zoo. The "glowing red eyes" she described are consistent with biological eyeshine reflecting the light from the restaurant, and her description of a golden "cap" aligns with the owl's distinct plumage, as well as its silent flight.

It was around this time that the Folklore consolidated into the basic pillars of the girls' sighting, the military cover-up, and the alien being at the hospitals. We could point to the logical incoherence of bringing an unknown biological entity into two crowded civilian public hospitals for many reasons, but it is also important to note the military scorn. The army made several citizens "disappear" during those 21 years of lead; why couldn't they make an alien disappear, too?

In the 1990s, Rede Globo had inherited its dictatorship status as an unofficial "Ministry of Truth," maintaining a near-total monopoly on national discourse – a trait investigated in the documentary "Beyond Citizen Kane." This dominance was not challenged by the rise of the Record Television Network, newly acquired by leaders of the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God. At the time, Record and the Church were locked in a bitter feud with Globo over allegations of tax evasion and other ethical improprieties [2]. For the record, debunking the Varginha case was not just a theological necessity, as the existence of extraterrestrials contradicted their evangelical doctrine, but a strategic opportunity to tarnish Globo's reputation of journalistic excellence. This corporate warfare manifested in the living room of Luiza Helena da Silva through a high-pressure incursion designed to exploit their economic vulnerability.

On April 29 1996, four men in dark suits arrived at her home with a calculated offer of economic independence in exchange for a televised retraction. They pressured Luiza to have her daughters claim they were mistaken, offering to deposit a life-changing sum into a savings account if they would record an interview for a non-local network. Despite her family's poverty under scrutiny, and oriented by the lawyer and ufologist Ubirajara, Luiza made a public refusal. The pressure returned on January 18, 1997, when two men in suits met her in the street, coerced her into a car, while wielding drawings of the creature and aggressively insisting it was "something bad" that needed to be denied. In a revealing moment of epistemic friction, when a distressed Luiza repeatedly invoked God, the men snapped, "Stop saying for the love of God all the time!" This sharp, arbitrary rejection of traditional Catholic phrasing provides the final piece of the puzzle. When we align the suspect, the motive, and specific behavioral markers, the "Men in Black" lose their extraterrestrial mystery and emerge as the earthly agents of a sectarian media strategy. We are left with a glass slipper that fits the feet of the Universal Church perfectly; Their suits, access to money, and behavior fit that of the evangelical preachers exactly.

In 1997, an anniversary press conference would present more narrative arcs of the Varginha narrative. Some, like the portable radar flown to Varginha from another state, were narrative arcs completely dropped from the official lore. Others are still presented as major plot points of the case, and would be featured as such in several documentaries in the years to come.

The Policeman Marco Eli Chereze, an intelligence officer, died in the weeks following the sighting by the girls. The Varginha Alien narrative claims that he died after coming into contact with one of the creatures. In reality, he was a victim of hospital-acquired infection, as written in 1996 by the very same doctors who were at the 2026 press conference. The origin of the "capture & contamination" story is the same ufologist accused of bribing the military witnesses and forging their rehearsed statements, Pacaccini.

The "crash & military retrieval" witness, Carlos de Souza, only made contact with the ufologists in October, after all the media had reported the case in length. Over time, he made 8 versions of his account. The details are often not just different; some are direct contradictions. His testimonies are not corroborated by the people who live where he claims the crash and military UFO retrieval with several pieces of debris, army vehicles, and helicopters took place.

In Moment of Contact, José Manoel "Buenas" Fernandes, Air Traffic Controller of the Congonhas airport (CGH), relays the second-hand account given by his colleague Marcos Feres. Fernandes gave an interview to UFO Magazine in June 2021, where he spoke about the Official UFO Night of 1986, but said nothing about the USAF Varginha 1996 event.

Congonhas' Air Traffic Controller Marcos Feres claimed in September 2021 that a USAF heavy transport aircraft violated Brazilian airspace and landed at Viracopos International Airport (VCP) in Campinas without authorization (AVOEM), and coordinated with two Brazilian Air Force SH-1D helicopters that were flown from Campinas to Varginha. However, the assertion that an Air Traffic Controller could bypass the complex, team-based environment of a major aviation hub without any corroboration from hundreds of ground staff is operationally incoherent. Also, the specific citation of SH-1D helicopters points to a Search and Rescue unit, usually based 850 km away at the Base Aérea de Campo Grande (BACG); It is unknown why these craft would be positioned at Campinas, and there is no report on these aircraft being at Viracopos in that date. The deployment of these turbine helicopters to Varginha was a physical risk due to the verified absence of required Jet A1 fuel at the local airport in 1996, meaning the aircraft could not have refueled for a safe return trip to Campinas.

At Moment of Contact's premiere, Pacaccini makes a wild claim. Allegedly, in 2012, he was allowed by the military to see a 35-second video of a captured alien. This suspiciously timed allegation has different details in several of his own retellings, and his description of the alien is different from what other non-anonymous witnesses claim.

The most recent addition to the alien narrative is Neurosurgeon Dr. Italo Venturelli.
Dr. Italo, a self-proclaimed actor, presented other versions of his encounter before. In 2025, he presents a very rehearsed version, which he never elaborates past the 4 minutes of interaction, in very evasive manners. His account is even embellished in retellings by third parties, such as James Fox.

Recent iterations of the Varginha Alien Narrative, such as Moment of Contact, The Debrief, Weaponized Podcast, Ross Coulthart, and others, chose not display the fragility in the accounts. When confronted directly with the arguments presented above, James chooses not to reply and evasively deflects to a congress where nothing new was presented, despite his suggestion of doing an official response then.

All of this information can be independently investigated.
The Varginha incident should be increasingly viewed by serious researchers as a "mythology" sustained by those who benefit from its mystery rather than investigate the UFO phenomenon. While the initial sightings by the three civilian witnesses should not be labeled as fraud, they lack the connection to any wider "alien" narrative, which most, if not all, investigative reporters worth their salt now consider to be a series of unfounded or purchased claims.
 
Last edited:
Boaventura mentioned James Fox (or someone from the U.S.?) filed a FOIA request for more information about them going to Brazil back in 1996 (if that happened in that period), and the excuse to not provide any info was "national security" (that's what he says, I haven't seen what was asked and the reply).


Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1b8sls5/response_to_my_foia_request_to_find_out_what_the/

Aren't we aware by now these requests are a complete joke? I didn't even knew this was tried and already guessed what they would do (even if there is nothing about this case, I might add). Considering the military are all scum, they aren't going to release any information that could clarify anything.

P.S. And to make matters worse, the thieves also charge you a lot of money (look at this message from reddit):

I'm shocked they only want $98 for two hours. I've seen them state it would be in the hundreds of man hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars to fulfill the request.

Yeah, that sounds a good idea. Except in the end you'll get nothing, besides filling their pockets. The same people that rob americans of a trillion dollars, every year (that's their budget).

And here we were thinking only UFO conspiracy theorists were grifters...
 
Last edited:
Considering the military are all scum...
No, "the military" is entirely 100٪ composed of our fellow humans. Like the rest of us, some are heroes and some are bad folks on balance, but all of them have good and bad traits just like me and you and everybody else. Like other human organizations, they feature goals and traditions that sometimes conflict with those of folks outside the organization as well as sometimes within sub-groups within the organization.
 
Considering the military are all scum

Where military personnel have made claims that support your views that something extraordinary has happened, you seem to credit them with unerringly accurate perception and recall; e.g. from the Hypothesis: Fravor's Tic Tac was Kurth's FA18 thread

Fravor's background makes misidentification extremely unlikely...
The problem is that the pilots saw the object visually, at close range, with no wings, no control surfaces, no exhaust, no windows, and no aerodynamic features. FRAVOR claims to have seen and there was no way he could have been confused
...despite examples given in that thread of military aircrew making serious misidentifications in conditions of excellent visibility.
 
I believe Perene is making that statement specifically regarding the Brazilian Army.
His disdain is unironically also one of the foundations of the Varginha case.

TheBrazilian military has played a different role than just the "defense" found in the DoD of the United States.
Since the 1889 coup, the Brazilian Armed Forces have operated under a self-appointed "Moderating Power" doctrine.
This messiah complex positioned generals as the ultimate arbiters of political stability. Using a cultural tactic known as jeitinho (strategic rule-bending), they have historically manipulated constitutional boundaries to suit institutional and personal interests, resulting in nine military-led coups since 1822. Three of them, were successful.

The latest one, the 1964 dictatorship (1964 to 1985), perfected this manipulation.
By framing state-sponsored terror and the suspension of civil liberties as a "necessary evil" against communism, the regime maintained a paternalistic facade of "order and progress", while abducting, torturing, and making political dissidents disappear. When the transition to democracy finally arrived in 1985, the military performed a masterclass in malandragem (street-smarts and cunning), securing full amnesty for their crimes while embedding themselves as "silent partners" in the new government. As the saying goes, the barracks were never emptied; the occupants simply changed uniforms into suits, doing their best to erase their crimes against humanity. But the memory of the tortured, killed, and missing during those 21 years of lead was not forgotten. Brazilians knew what the military had done. So when the rumors about army trucks taking away a "creature" surged, citizens didn't ask IF the military was hiding something - they asked WHAT.
 
I believe Perene is making that statement specifically regarding the Brazilian Army.
That would be true if they (the Brazilian Army) were the only ones guilty of all you said.

I didn't credit anyone in the "Tic-Tac" case with anything. All I did in that thread was to give the benefit of the doubt, which seems to be an alien (no pun intended...) concept in here. It would be best to describe Metabunk members as "atheists" to the possibility of any UFO story being true, you would invent anything and twist every possible angle to justify denying the possibility that someone saw something that can't be explained, it's kinda like entering online boards from Richard Dawkins fans and trying to discuss the validity of religion and God's existence. :cool:

You seem to have missed, in that Nimitz case, my messages about military personnel claiming there was a cover-up (and why I am not surprised the same script is repeated for Varginha? Do these people ever cared about being forthcoming of what they do?). Without investigating why they would do such a thing (all people that affirm data was seized, were coerced into not talking, and so on), there is no way we could discover anything about it, otherwise it's all down to "trust me, bro" (meaning = the same weight (for science) as anyone telling it saw a ghost).

We all know images and videos will NEVER prove anything - no matter when they were taken, would be considered fake (remember that for later, when I mention the "Varginha" tape).

To debunk the whole thing, all we need to do is to identify the ones responsible for such "cover-up", all the victims, and gather everyone that had any participation in the multiple events.

I don't think any of that was seriously done. I have read (much better) summaries/reports from UFO enthusiasts. When the U.S. Congress do anything remotely similar to what I suggest, it is also to ridicule.

For the Varginha case, instead of saying there was no evidence to conclude this was an alien, a chimera or anything extraordinary, the military instead tried to make the whole thing a mockery, it seems they didn't even listen to the girls in the inquiry, tried to blame Mudinho (even though no one believes it was him, and makes no sense it could be that guy - AT ALL), their conclusion makes it clear to me this was (another) cover-up.

Like I said before, even when there's nothing and the whole thing appears to be a fraud, the military will make all possible efforts to hide the truth from being told. It seems they benefit from keeping stories spread by UFO conspiracy enthusiasts alive, probably because a few are either psy-ops, or they are doing illegal / bad stuff during said events.

Watch cryptologic technician's Karson Kammerzell Youtube video and you'll notice the way he talks about David Fravor (which tried to dismiss everyone else) and how the military are full of shit when it comes to not telling themselves (not just us) about the shady things they often do (secret projects? he clearly tells us it could have been one). To believe any of them are trustworthy is kinda like Indiana Jones trying to coddle lots of snakes that surround him (you remember that scene from the film). ;)

I don't know what world you are all living in. In mine, I view them all (the military) as lying weasels.

But at least in the Nimitz case the ones that make such statements of a cover-up and odd flying objects are not cowards that have chosen to hide their faces and decades later change what they always said it was the truth, because a big TV channel approaches them, and with no proof accuse others of bribing the "story" to come out.

Where is the evidence for that, too?

Oh, I see. That can only be what happened, because it benefits our "debunking". The rest, of course, is false.

I see what you did there. :rolleyes:

In the end, there is nothing substantial, except hearsay + anecdotal evidence for the Varginha case. Period. UFO grifters will rehash the same tales and invent new ones (no one ever talked about a "tape" in the last 3 decades! And there are even new "actors" like that "renowned" neurologist, which are taken seriously, despite coming so late...).

To believe any person that had their image and voice distorted (when it could be a Globo employee saying what the TV wanted to broadcast, so we didn't have to pay a dimme to fabricate any version), is utter BS (or the person paying the military that invented the story must be the dumbest brazilian ever).

I would tell to all the military that changed their versions and say they were paid to spread BS: either reveal your identity, acting like a man (not a gutter rat) or it's more likely others pressed you to do it now (and that could include the grifters, not just their peers, don't think for a second that entire town wants any "secret" to come out).

What is funny is that @BoulderRiver and others are always experts in how the human brain, memory, eyes, etc. work, but when witnesses (like that guy that threatened the James Fox crew) act all SUSPICIOUS, they can't guess why.
 
Last edited:
What is funny is that @BoulderRiver and others are always experts in how the human brain, memory, eyes, etc. work, but when witnesses (like that guy that threatened the James Fox crew) act all SUSPICIOUS, they can't guess why.

You mean why did the guy who repeatedly stated he didn't want any part in the weird story and always refused to give an interview get his property invaded by three cars without any announcement filled with random people he never met before wielding cameras filming everything without requesting permission, then threatened to shoot if they didn't get the fuck out of his property?

You think that is suspicious, or is that just a man who was bothered to hell and had to resort to announcing violence to get those weirdos out of his home?

C'mon...
No degree in mental health is needed to figure that one out.
 
No, "the military" is entirely 100٪ composed of our fellow humans. Like the rest of us, some are heroes and some are bad folks on balance, but all of them have good and bad traits just like me and you and everybody else. Like other human organizations, they feature goals and traditions that sometimes conflict with those of folks outside the organization as well as sometimes within sub-groups within the organization.
@Perene, I see you marked that post with "disagree," which is absolutely your right, but I am curious if you could explain which part or parts is/are the bit you disagree with, and why. I do not feel that you have any obligation to do so, but I am interested. Thanks!
 
It would be best to describe Metabunk members as "atheists" to the possibility of any UFO story being true, you would invent anything and twist every possible angle to justify denying the possibility that someone saw something that can't be explained
We have seen example after example of sightings of mundane objects being misidentified as "UFOs" (as well as examples of people who make their fantastic claims for attention or for profit). The scientists among us comprehend the difficulties of interstellar travel and the genuine impossibility of some of the claims that have been made concerning speed or behavior in our atmosphere. We have NEVER seen an unequivocal example of a UFO nor a piece of genuine extraterrestrial material from a UFO. It's hardly surprising that most of us remain unconvinced that they exist. The time to believe something is AFTER the evidence has been produced, and so far it has not.

I don't take kindly to your rude insults to all who disagree with you, the people here who are trying their best to investigate the matter, and the authorities that you disdain.
 
It's not a far-fetched idea to assume the United States have conducted multiple secret/complex military operations for decades, including acting in a country like Brazil. That's why most people don't trust them. To think this is limited to individuals is to remain ignorant how corrupt the institution is.

Many UFO stories have them involved, and if you dig deeper you may find their crimes (so it wasn't an alien spaceship, just them doing illegal stuff). It's a general consensus (about the Varginha case) something happened (what, we can't really tell - aliens? chimeras? odd monkeys?).

No one thinks this was another case where someone misidentified what it saw, then ufologists came and convinced it was an alien, then many witnesses thought they saw the military acting odd, then hospital employees saw something anomalous, then Fortunato Antônio Badan Palhares admitted recently:

"I received a phone call in which, strangely, I was informed not to leave the laboratory because a team from the Brazilian Army was bringing material from Varginha, and that this material was important for carrying out the complete exhumation work. And this material has not arrived to this day."

And it wasn't nothing, just a prank...

Plus, 300 more tales were spread, lots of liars and grifters came and messed with everything and tainted the whole case. That could have happened, sure. Doesn't mean the whole thing was a fraud.

Oh, and of course someone threatens to shoot a filming crew because it was too bothered (to not act like a man and tell this whole thing was a bunch of crap). It must be that, not because he is involved in said conspiracy... :cool:
 
It's not a far-fetched idea to assume the United States have conducted multiple secret/complex military operations for decades, including acting in a country like Brazil. That's why most people don't trust them. To think this is limited to individuals is to remain ignorant how corrupt the institution is.

Many UFO stories have them involved, and if you dig deeper you may find their crimes (so it wasn't an alien spaceship, just them doing illegal stuff). It's a general consensus (about the Varginha case) something happened (what, we can't really tell - aliens? chimeras? odd monkeys?).

No one thinks this was another case where someone misidentified what it saw, then ufologists came and convinced it was an alien, then many witnesses thought they saw the military acting odd, then hospital employees saw something anomalous, then Fortunato Antônio Badan Palhares admitted recently:

"I received a phone call in which, strangely, I was informed not to leave the laboratory because a team from the Brazilian Army was bringing material from Varginha, and that this material was important for carrying out the complete exhumation work. And this material has not arrived to this day."

And it wasn't nothing, just a prank...

Plus, 300 more tales were spread, lots of liars and grifters came and messed with everything and tainted the whole case. That could have happened, sure. Doesn't mean the whole thing was a fraud.

Oh, and of course someone threatens to shoot a filming crew because it was too bothered (to not act like a man and tell this whole thing was a bunch of crap). It must be that, not because he is involved in said conspiracy... :cool:
We get it, Perene. You're a conspiracy theorist. But what you call conspiracies are just as well explained by human mistakes, human misunderstandings, human suspicions (either grounded or ungrounded in fact), human fantasies, and the very human practice of embellishing the truth (or the untruth) to make a better story.
 
It's not a far-fetched idea to assume the United States have conducted multiple secret/complex military operations for decades, including acting in a country like Brazil. That's why most people don't trust them. To think this is limited to individuals is to remain ignorant how corrupt the institution is.

This is true.
In fact, there is sufficient paper trail to suggest that "the first modern UFO abduction" of Antonio Villas Boas in 1957 was actually part of a CIA operation.

I received a phone call in which, strangely, I was informed not to leave the laboratory because a team from the Brazilian Army was bringing material from Varginha
On May 12th 1996, Pacaccini, John Mack, the initial witnesses and their families were gathered in the living room watching the third fantástico show about the Varginha Case. Soon after the ET segment ended, Pacaccini states he received a call from his "trusted source". It was someone informing him of Badan Palhares' autopsy of the Alien at Unicamp.

Pacaccini states in this "secret" lecture to Stanton Friedman et al. that his brother's PhD supervisor was Badan Palhares' lab assistant, and that was the source of Badan Palhares involvement. It is also possible to presume through his podcast interviews and books that his brother was the link between the ufologist and other "witnesses", being called by the pseudonym "Sergio"

This means It would not be hard for Pacaccini to access Badan Palhares' lab number on UNICAMP and either call it or hire someone to do it.

Oh, and of course someone threatens to shoot a filming crew because it was too bothered (to not act like a man and tell this whole thing was a bunch of crap). It must be that, not because he is involved in said conspiracy... :cool:
Or because he was paid by Pacaccini to remain quiet.
Remember, Eric Lopes is the only one who could objectively deny the story; A story whose source is Pacaccini and nobody else.
 
Last edited:
...there is sufficient paper trail to suggest that "the first modern UFO abduction" of Antonio Villas Boas in 1957 was actually part of a CIA operation.
Maybe there should be a thread for that.

It is mentioned under "Alternative explanation" on the Portuguese Wikipedia page Caso Vilas-Boas, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caso_Vilas-Boas.
The source of the story seems to be Bosco Nedelcovic, who has made a number of, er, controversial claims (some of which conflict with known science); the story was confirmed by Richard Doty, who also confirmed the authenticity of the Majestic 12 documents and aliens from Zeta Reticuli.

Edited to add: In October 1954 the popular Brazilian magazine O Cruzeiro carried an account of a convention involving George Adamski; João Martins from that magazine was in attendance. He was apparently very struck by the features of a young woman, Dolores Barrios, whom he annoyed by calling her a Venusian. Martins theorised she was a Venusian (even Adamski baulked at this) and that she left in a UFO.
Historic Mysteries website, "Dolores Barrios: An Alien in Plain Sight?", Bipin Dimri, March 15, 2022
https://www.historicmysteries.com/unexplained-mysteries/dolores-barrios-alien/23700/
Infinity Explorers website, "Dolores Barrios: The Woman From Planet Venus", Ansh Srivastava, August 14, 2021
https://www.infinityexplorers.com/dolores-barrios-the-woman-from-planet-venus/

Vilas-Boas may have read Martins' account.
 
Last edited:
We get it, Perene. You're a conspiracy theorist. But what you call conspiracies are just as well explained by human mistakes, human misunderstandings, human suspicions (either grounded or ungrounded in fact), human fantasies, and the very human practice of embellishing the truth (or the untruth) to make a better story.
You gotta admit it's hard to not think these cases have some sort of conspiracy (and that doesn't need to involve aliens!) when there are multiple elements that point to suppression of evidence. Sure, a few theories are also created to fill the gaps (UFO grifters will not only conclude that, they also invent their own), however the insistence of the "actors" involved in not being transparent about it, and preventing any truth from being told, screams "guilt".

It's also too convenient when you read stuff like that:

https://g1.globo.com/mg/sul-de-mina...uvidas-sobre-registros-do-caso-varginha.ghtml

++++++++++
"Why were they removed?" Altered police reports fuel doubts about official records in the 'Varginha Case'
++++++++++

Thirty years after the episode known as the Varginha Case, one of the most controversial issues involves the official police records created on January 20, 1996. Incident reports from that day contain erasures, renumbering, and missing entries, which, according to researchers, make it impossible to fully reconstruct what happened.

Using Brazil's Freedom of Information Act (similar to the U.S. FOIA), a researcher obtained copies of the police reports filed on that date. An analysis of the documents revealed gaps in the sequential numbering and the absence of records that should normally be present in police archives.

++++++++++
"If you look at the reports that still exist from January 20, there are only nine. When you examine the sequential numbers, you can see they were all altered — crossed out, corrected with white-out, and renumbered. We also obtained copies of the originals with their initial numbering, and it became clear that 19 reports simply disappeared. Why were these reports removed?"
— said anomalous phenomena researcher Rony Vernet.
++++++++++

According to him, the remaining reports show a significant gap during the morning hours. There is one report around 10 a.m., and then the next records only appear late at night.

The former commander of the Varginha Fire Department denies any attempt to conceal incidents and attributes the inconsistencies to common flaws in manual, handwritten record-keeping.

++++++++++
"At the time, nothing was digitized. Everything was handwritten. If there was a numbering mistake, sometimes several entries had to be corrected. That may have happened that day,"
explained Pedro Alvarenga, former fire department commander.
++++++++++

He also denied that any unusual response could have been hidden from the department.

++++++++++
"There's no way something like that could have happened without people knowing. If anything extraordinary had occurred, it would have spread as talk among us. You can't keep a secret like that," he said.
++++++++++

++++++++++
Military activity in the city
++++++++++

One of the most frequently cited aspects of the case involves the presence of Brazilian Army trucks, linked to the School of Army Sergeants (ESA), circulating through Varginha — especially near the Jardim Andere neighborhood — on January 20, 1996, and in the days that followed. Residents claim that military vehicles, police, and firefighters sealed off areas of the city.

++++++++++
"Varginha came to a standstill. The city stopped because of the ESA movement. The Army surrounded a neighborhood — police, firefighters, everything. They shut it down, isolated everyone. Even residents couldn't get in or out,"
said coffee grower Tiago Rezende.
++++++++++

The military activity led to the opening of a Military Police Inquiry, nearly 400 pages long, with testimony from 26 individuals. According to the final report, the trucks were in the city for routine mechanical maintenance at a local dealership.

++++++++++
"At the time, the School of Sergeants had acquired new trucks. When a tire was replaced, wheel alignment was required, and the ESA didn't have that equipment. So we brought the vehicles to Varginha. During that week, I came several times,"
said Ricardo de Mello, a retired Army serviceman.
++++++++++

++++++++++
Account involving a police officer allegedly involved in a capture
++++++++++

UFO researchers also claim that, on the night of January 20, a military police patrol allegedly encountered a non-human creature. According to this version, two officers were inside the vehicle. One never spoke about the incident. The other, Marco Eli Chereze, allegedly participated in the capture and died 26 days later, at age 23.

++++++++++
"He took part in the capture. Those were his own words. This case will still raise many questions,"
said at the time Marta Tavares, the officer's sister.
++++++++++

Asked recently whether she believes her brother had physical contact with the alleged creature, she replied:

++++++++++
"It's possible. Skin contact, maybe. I believe so. He participated in the capture."
++++++++++

++++++++++
Death of the officer and medical reports
++++++++++

The official autopsy states that Marco Eli Chereze died from pulmonary embolism, with oxygen deprivation to the heart and liver congestion.

++++++++++
"He arrived with a small lesion, then developed spinal pain, pneumonia, and later septicemia — a generalized infection,"
said forensic physician Armando Fortunato, who participated in his medical evaluation.
++++++++++

Another forensic doctor, João Baptista Macuco Janini, told the investigative team of The Mystery of Varginha that he had never seen a similar case in decades of professional experience.

++++++++++
"The bacteria spread throughout the body. In more than 50,000 autopsies, I've never seen anything like it. The bacteria was under the nail of the ET," he said.
++++++++++

++++++++++
Witnesses demand official recognition
++++++++++

Three decades later, the women who say they saw the creature in a vacant lot continue to stand by their testimony and demand official acknowledgment.

++++++++++
"We want someone, someday, to come forward and say: it was real. We captured it, we took it, and it happened,"
said schoolteacher Liliane Silva.
++++++++++

She added:

++++++++++
"Nothing happens by chance. We took a different route, crossed a vacant lot we weren't used to, and we saw the creature — alive. Over these 30 years, we've come to understand that we're special, that we were chosen."
++++++++++

++++++++++
"The ones waiting for the truth are us,"
said Kátia Xavier, a caregiver and public speaker.
++++++++++
 

I find it at least interesting that there is no mention that the fire department's incident reports from every other day present the same pattern of erasures, renumbering, and missing records. Afterall, that is something to be expected from manual input of documents; if you wrongly set a number 3 and you've already written 12, you must renumber 4 through 12...

It is also an incredible discrepancy of the retellings in that recent story, from what was reported and observed during those first few weeks of February, according to the first report on the case, all February O Estado de Minas Newspaper Stories, and the Manchete magazine article.
 
Last edited:
It would be best to describe Metabunk members as "atheists" to the possibility of any UFO story being true,
Substitute credible for true, and I'd agree.
We do think many witnesses saw something.
We don't think their identification of that something is correct.
And we know their memory of the event has parts that have morphed, because that's how human memory works.
That's why we're asking for hard evidence.
Based on that, we can then decide if that "UFO story" is true.
But on its own, it's not credible.
 
You gotta admit it's hard to not think these cases have some sort of conspiracy (and that doesn't need to involve aliens!) when there are multiple elements that point to suppression of evidence. Sure, a few theories are also created to fill the gaps (UFO grifters will not only conclude that, they also invent their own), however the insistence of the "actors" involved in not being transparent about it, and preventing any truth from being told, screams "guilt".

It's also too convenient when you read stuff like that:

I seriously can't figure out where you're coming from. Up thread you made statements like:

It would be best to describe Metabunk members as "atheists" to the possibility of any UFO story being true, you would invent anything and twist every possible angle to justify denying the possibility that someone saw something that can't be explained, it's kinda like entering online boards from Richard Dawkins fans and trying to discuss the validity of religion and God's existence.
Oh, I see. That can only be what happened, because it benefits our "debunking". The rest, of course, is false.

But then say there is lot's of bunk in the UFO world:

In the end, there is nothing substantial, except hearsay + anecdotal evidence for the Varginha case. Period. UFO grifters will rehash the same tales and invent new ones (no one ever talked about a "tape" in the last 3 decades! And there are even new "actors" like that "renowned" neurologist, which are taken seriously, despite coming so late...).
Plus, 300 more tales were spread, lots of liars and grifters came and messed with everything and tainted the whole case. That could have happened, sure. Doesn't mean the whole thing was a fraud.

Back and forth. Then as usual you post yet another long list of claims that, I assume, are supposed to add up to something? This is a classic case of the "sum is greater than the parts" argument, or a printed version of a Gish Gallop. An attempt to just throw out a whole series of claims and insinuating they all add up to some grand conclusion. But do they? I'm not going through all of them, but I'll look at one.

https://g1.globo.com/mg/sul-de-mina...uvidas-sobre-registros-do-caso-varginha.ghtml (With Google translate from the original Portuguese)

Yet another take on the death of Officer Chereze:

External Quote:

Ufologists also maintain that, on the night of January 20th, a Military Police vehicle encountered an alleged creature. According to this version, two police officers were in the vehicle. One of them never spoke about the matter. The other, Marco Eli Chereze, allegedly participated in the capture and died 26 days later, at the age of 23.
The accompanying photo of Mr. Chereze lists him as a "Police Officer". I don't know how it works in Brazil, but in the US, Police Officers are local law enforcement officers. They are NOT part of the military. Why would a Military Police vehicle, presumably from outside the town, pick up a couple of local Police Officers while on a super secret alien hunt? Even if they wanted them to come along to offer local Intel, they wouldn't take them along on a secret alien recovery operation not knowing anything about them, would they? Seems the MPs would just tell the local guys to stay in the truck, while the MPs handled official military business.

One of the Dr. that treated him said it was an unfortunate sepsis infection that got out of hand:
External Quote:

The official report indicates that Marco Eli Chereze died from a pulmonary embolism, with insufficient oxygen to the heart and congestion in the liver.
"He arrived with a minor injury, which progressed to back pain, pneumonia, and then septicemia, a generalized infection," stated forensic doctor Armando Fortunato, who participated in the treatment.
But then we get this from someone, who appears to just have reviewed the case for some UFO enthusiasts:

External Quote:

Another forensic doctor, João Baptista Macuco Janini, told the "The Mystery of Varginha" team that he had never seen a similar case in decades of his career.

"The bacterial spread throughout the body. With over 50,000 autopsies, I've never seen anything like it. The bacteria was under the aliens fingernail" he said.
The sepsis spread "throughout the body", that's why it was lethal. Then we have "50,000 autopsies". Really? Maybe, but if we do a bit of math and assume this guy has been doing autopsies for 40 years, that's 14,600 days and at 50,000, that assumes he's been doing ~ 3 1/2 autopsies per day non-stop for 40 years. No vacations, no sick days. Maybe?

More importantly is the claim that "the bacteria was under the aliens fingernail". To use a phrase my son learned upon moving to Tennessee: "dowatnow" (do what now)? So, he seems to be acknowledging that the bacteria sepsis was in fact responsible for Chereze's unfortunate demise, but then makes a completely bonkers claim that a common earth bacteria was "under the aliens fingernails". How the hell would he know? Did he examine the aliens fingernails? Did he culture the bacteria to see if it was from an alien's fingernails? Where did the aliens get it? It's rubbish.

One can go through the entire list of claims made in this article and likely find similar problems. If some, or many of the claims fail under scrutiny, then at some point the entire house of cards collapses.

 
I don't know how it works in Brazil, but in the US, Police Officers are local law enforcement officers. They are NOT part of the military

Pertaining to this, brazil has three types of police unit; Civilian police, Military Police, and Federal Police.
In short;
  • Civilian Police (PC) deals with crime investigation locally, like robberies, internet hate crimes, Ponzi schemes, anything that regarding state justice.
  • Federal Police (PF) is an investigative force subordinate to the Department of Justice in the federal sphere, investigating and acting on a national level; usually when the crime gets too big for the Civilian police, or involves many states. Similar to a "Brazilian FBI".
  • Military Police (PM) is ostensive, subordinate to the state government, and the main purpose is patrolling and fighting crime physically. Military Police forces (PMs) are auxiliary forces and also reserves of the Brazilian Army; their militarized structure is organized into intermediate commands, battalions, companies, and platoons.
  • In Brazil, the firefighters are also a Military Corps subordinate to the state government. They can act as public security forces, responsible for civil defense, firefighting, and search and rescue in each state.
The Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais (PMMG) and the Corpo de Bombeiros Militares de Minas Gerais (CBMMG) - Military police and Firefighters of Minas Gerais - were the ones allegedly involved in this case, aiding the army. It would bypass several layers of red tape required to pull these bodies into aiding the armed forces directly

Surprisingly, another UFO event, much less known than varginha also featured this Police Force.
Albeit more credible, it still features incredible sightings and beings, with several policemen even writing official reports on their experiences. "Caso Cláudio", in november/december 2008.
Much like the Operação Prato/Colares Events, only blurry photos, credible eyewitness accounts, and official reports exist from those weeks of anomalous experiences.


One can go through the entire list of claims made in this article and likely find similar problems. If some, or many of the claims fail under scrutiny, then at some point the entire house of cards collapses.

It's amazing the moral flexibility of those who continue this narrative.
Dr. Janini's commentaries in 1996 on the tissue analysis state clearly he did not have the autopsy report, nor the context of the young man, and even then his first death hypothesis would be sepsis from Hospital-acquired Infection. The ufologists kept from Janini the detail that the policeman had undergone surgery days prior to his death, but offered the made-up story that he carried an alien, and it might have hurt him. They also diminish the importance of a hidradenitis cyst, which can be a very deep wound.

Also, it's important to note that those 50k autopsies were made under his signature, but not investigated by himself.
Janini had a forensic clinic, I presume he just oversaw a lot of autopsies. Otherwise, that would mean he did 2-3 autopsies per day, every day, for 60 years. Quite an amount for a town with less than 150k inhabitants like varginha.
 
Last edited:
Pertaining to this, brazil has three types of police unit; Civilian police, Military Police, and Federal Police.

Thanks for the clarification. I guess the big question is what was Chereze, local, Military or Federal? It can be confusing in the US as well, we have multiple layers, though the actual military is barred in most circumstances from law enforcement.
 
I think (@BoulderRiver, @Perene will know) the Policia Militar are organised along state lines, but are under the supervision of the National Council of Public Security. The Wikipedia article "Law enforcement in Brazil" says
External Quote:
the State Military Police and Fire Brigade... ... are subordinated to state governments.
The Brazilian Military Police are a major police /public order presence in day-to-day life in Brazil, but are not responsible for policing within the armed services (i.e. the PMs are not what most English speakers would think of as military police), they police the civil population.

The Policia Militar might be thought of as a gendarmerie more than what most English speakers would think of as a police force (or a military police unit), see Wikipedia, "Military Police (Brazil)" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Police_(Brazil), also "Gendarmerie" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gendarmerie
There isn't really an equivalent in USA/ UK/ Aus. etc.
 
Thanks for the clarification. I guess the big question is what was Chereze, local, Military or Federal? It can be confusing in the US as well, we have multiple layers, though the actual military is barred in most circumstances from law enforcement.
Chereze was a "P2" with the soldier rank in the Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais.
As John J. explained above, the Policia Militar is basically a "gendarmaerie"

Eric Lopes was his direct superior, a "P2" Corporal.

Their role as members of the P2 might best be described to an American audience as "plainclothes intelligence operatives" who serve as a bridge between strategic analysis and tactical action. Different from the traditional patrol officers, they operate in civilian attire to conduct surveillance and gather human intelligence on criminal organizations. The designation itself follows a military staff structure, in which the Second Section (P2) is responsible for intelligence, meaning its primary mission is not the judicial investigation seen in American detective work, but the production of actionable data to guide high-risk operations and ensure internal security.

The Policia Militar might be thought of as a gendarmerie
That's surprisingly accurate!
I had never heard of that nomenclature before. It's pretty much what the "Polícia Militar" is
 
Last edited:
I don't know if this was discussed here or somewhere else... it seems the military argued there was nothing to be retrieved (in terms of information/documents about their role back in 1996), but extended the period in which the docs pertaining to this event were classified (which is a contradiction, of course).

It appears in Brazil this is up to 25 years, so it ended in 2021, yet they are also allowed to do this again, so another 25, until 2046. There was a request from a brazilian Congressman in which the Minister of Defense responded, as usual for this corrupt institution, denying there was anything that could be sent to him.

Was this "angle" of the Varginha case explained? Since @BoulderRiver seems to be aware of the facts, perhaps he can clarify.

If you understand the language, the PDF of said request can be fully read here (and the response): https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra?codteor=1758889

I asked AI about it...

Brazil's classification and declassification authority is governed by law (e.g., Law No. 12.527/2011, the Access to Information Law) and specific administrative secret-classification rules. Official classification timelines can be extended for national security or defense reasons, but a publicly accessible notice of such an extension for Varginha specifically has not been found in reliable sources.

There have been discussions and hearings involving members of Congress where ufologists and activists claimed that:

-- military archive documents about UFO incidents — including Varginha — remain classified;

-- they feel official responses have been inadequate;

-- some documents have been released via the Access to Information Law after appeals.

These are efforts by civilian groups to access information, not official acknowledgements that the documents are being kept secret for another 25 years under a formal extension.

++++++++++
National Archives releases
++++++++++

Some previously classified government documents unrelated to the 1996 incident — e.g., older reports on UFO sightings from as far back as the 1970s — have been declassified and made publicly available via the National Archives because their classification period expired or was lifted.

This shows the system can make materials available once classification lapses or the classification is overruled.

+++++++
What is not supported by evidence
+++++++

-- The idea that the government has officially stated that all documents regarding Varginha were classified for 25 years and then deliberately re-classified for another 25 specifically to hide the case — this is not confirmed by government records or statements from Ministries or Defense authorities.

-- There is no authoritative release from the Brazilian Ministry of Defense stating that the classification period was extended until 2046. The statement that appears in ufology sources is an interpretation or claim made by researchers, not a government communication.
To help with presenting my point, I am going to translate only what said Congressman asked (full text below):

Request to the Minister of State for Defense

++++++++++
Subject: Request for information regarding the identification, location, and summary content of documents related to extraordinary military occurrences (1996–1997)
++++++++++

The undersigned formally requests from the Minister of State for Defense information regarding the identification, location, and brief description of the contents of any documentation containing evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information, produced by military or civilian personnel, and currently held under the custody of the Brazilian Army.

This request applies to documents originated and classified during the years 1996 and 1997, as well as to documents produced in subsequent years insofar as they are correlated to those earlier records.

Mr. President,
Pursuant to the applicable parliamentary rules, I respectfully request that Your Excellency, after consultation with the House leadership, formally seek from the Minister of State for Defense detailed information concerning the identification, physical or archival location, and concise content summary of all documentation containing evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information, generated by military or civilian personnel, under the custody of the Brazilian Army, and originated and classified between 1996 and 1997, as well as in later years where such documentation may be related.

Specifically, this request concerns documentation generated under the authority of the Eastern Military Command (Comando Militar do Leste) and its subordinate commands, particularly within the 4th Military Region / 4th Army Division, to which the Army Sergeants School (Escola de Sargentos das Armas – ESA) is subordinated.

This request also includes any documentation derived from orders issued by higher command levels, up to and including the Brazilian Army High Command in Brasília, insofar as such orders relate to any extraordinary occurrence or operation registered at that military unit during the referenced period.

The scope of this request expressly includes:

Documents classified under the secrecy legislation in force at the time;

Documents that were later reclassified;

Documents whose classification periods were extended from that time until the enactment of Brazil's Access to Information Law (No. 12,527/2011);

Documents currently subject to restricted access under the Access to Information Law, related decrees, regulations, ordinances, and subsequent instructions.

The requested information should be provided following the formats illustrated in the attached tables (Annexes I and II).

++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++
Justification
++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++

This Federal Deputy is the author of two prior Requests for Information submitted to the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on this same subject, namely the public's right of access to classified information related to the registration and study of unidentified flying objects and their occupants, internationally known as ufology: Requests No. 4470/2009 and No. 679/2011.

Both requests were partially answered by the three branches of the Brazilian Armed Forces, acting through the Ministry of Defense. Within the limits of what the Armed Forces asserted to be the factual content of their archives, these responses confirmed not only the existence of such information, but also the occurrence of incidents involving alleged UFOs and their occupants, as well as the seriousness with which at least the Brazilian Air Force (FAB) treats the subject.

At present, more than 10,000 pages of documents and other informational materials, in various formats, have been collected and are held by the National Archives in Brasília and Rio de Janeiro, all of which were transferred by the Brazilian Air Force. This does not include the Air Force's own procedural regulations governing the collection, registration, archiving, and subsequent transfer of such materials to public archives.

These procedures are formally established in Ordinance No. 551/GC3 of August 9, 2010, issued by the Brazilian Air Force and widely known among researchers as the so-called "UFO Law."

However, despite the demonstrated efforts of the Brazilian Air Force, many of the issues raised in the earlier requests remain unresolved. With the passage of time—seven years since the response to the most recent request—there has been no comparable willingness by the Brazilian Army and Navy to provide information to interested citizens.

This is particularly significant given that the same phenomena that justified the Air Force's adoption and publication of procedures for documentation and archiving occur not only in Brazilian airspace, but also over and under Brazilian territorial waters, and are registered on land across Brazil's more than 8.5 million square kilometers of national territory.

Accordingly, this is not a matter pertaining to a single branch of the Armed Forces, but rather one that necessarily involves all three forces responsible for national defense.

In particular, the central justification of this Request is grounded in the search for information regarding a specific case of major national impact and equal international repercussion, known in the media as the "Varginha UFO Incident", or among ufologists as the "Varginha Case." The events occurred in the city of Varginha, in the state of Minas Gerais, in early 1996, and their media coverage persisted for at least another year thereafter.

This case is of singular importance for a number of reasons, two of which are especially relevant to scientific inquiry and public transparency. First, because, according to ufologists, it involved the crash of a craft of unknown technology and the capture of at least two of its occupants. Second, because of the remarkable operation to conceal the facts, carried out for reasons that remain unclear to this day.

These suspicions further lead to another serious conclusion, namely a possible breach of national sovereignty, arising from the alleged final destination of the crashed craft's materials and the recovered bodies, which—according to ufologists and reportedly based on statements by the military personnel involved—were transferred to the United States of America, allegedly against the wishes of several Brazilian officers, for reasons that are self-evident.

The lack of public information regarding the case, which is considered genuine by a significant portion of the population of Varginha, has resulted in prejudice, ridicule, embarrassment, emotional suffering, and persistent doubt affecting witnesses and relatives of those directly involved. This includes, notably, the family of Military Police officer Marco Eli Chereze, who is alleged to have been a fatal victim of direct physical contact with one of the entities' occupants.

++++++++++
Access to Information Law and Subsequent Developments
++++++++++

After the enactment of Brazil's Access to Information Law (Lei de Acesso à Informação – LAI) — which was sanctioned after the aforementioned Requests for Information had already been answered—new questions arose regarding official procedures, particularly those of the Brazilian Army.

Since 2012, multiple requests have been submitted through the Federal Government's Electronic Citizen Information Service (e-SIC). All such requests have either been denied outright or answered in a manner that avoids revealing what may still remain classified.

One example is the notable and ongoing absence, to date, on the Brazilian Army's official website, of the Document Indexing Codes for Classified Information (CIDICs) originating in the years 1996 and 1997.

Article 45, Item II, of Decree No. 7,724—one of the decrees enacted to regulate and give effect to the Access to Information Law—mandates that all documents that remain classified must have their identifying codes disclosed in a specific public listing, published on the official websites of the responsible public agencies, by June 1 of each year.

If such documents do in fact exist and were generated between 1996 and 1997, as suggested by a substantial body of circumstantial and testimonial evidence, then, for them to remain classified, they could only have been classified at the time under the "Top Secret" (Ultrassecreto) category, whose maximum classification period is 25 years.

++++++++++
Classification Period and Alleged Violations
++++++++++

Indeed, one of the principal military witnesses to the Varginha Case stated unequivocally, in a recorded testimony, that the operation to transport the unknown biological entities, alleged occupants of the crashed craft, carried out on January 23, 1996, from the Army Sergeants School (ESA) to Campinas (UNICAMP), was treated by commanding officers as top secret, and was accordingly classified under that category.

Under these circumstances, the records related to this operation should have become publicly accessible on January 24, 2021. Nevertheless, the CIDIC identifying such records should already exist and should already be available to interested parties.

Given that Decree No. 7,724 entered into force on May 16, 2012, the question remains: why has the Brazilian Army still failed to include, in its publicly available "List of Top Secret Information," the CIDICs related to this and other occurrences associated with the Varginha Case, even six years after the Access to Information Law came into effect?

++++++++++
Transparency and Classification Practices
++++++++++

Beyond these issues, it is evident that, on the webpage designated for the publication of the Brazilian Army's "List of Classified and Declassified Information"—available at the Army's official website—the content does not follow the recommendations set forth in the "Guide for Publishing Lists of Classified and Declassified Information and Statistical Reports under the Access to Information Law," issued by Brazil's Ministry of Transparency and the Office of the Comptroller General (CGU), and made available through the federal e-SIC system.

According to this guide, specifically in subsection B.2.4 – Content of the 'List of Classified Information', the following recommendation is stated clearly:

"It is further recommended that the agency or entity disclose the general subject matter of the classified document, with the aim of increasing transparency regarding its content and enabling public oversight. It should be noted that including the subject matter in the list of classified documents assists in future reference identification, as provided for in Article 30, Item II, of Law No. 12,527/2011. For this purpose, the agency should provide the broadest possible description of the document's content, without, however, revealing the restricted information itself."

This recommendation, however, is simply ignored by the Brazilian Army.

++++++++++
Patterns Suggesting Systematic Reclassification
++++++++++

Another point of concern in the list of documents classified as Top Secret (Ultrassecreto) is that only those whose secrecy period is set to expire either in the year prior to, or in the same year as, the publication of the list—up to June 1—are disclosed.

As a result, by June 1, 2017—the most recent update, which was actually published in 2016—all top-secret documents listed were on the verge of reaching the end of their secrecy period, meaning those originally classified up to 1992, twenty-five years earlier.

Notably, there are no documents in this list classified as top secret after 1992. Furthermore, all documents classified at this highest level already appear with an approved recommendation for reclassification, effectively extending their secrecy for another twenty-five years.

There is no known case of a document classified at the highest secrecy level that was not reclassified, nor of any such document that was effectively declassified after the Access to Information Law entered into force.

If this logic persists—one that elevates secrecy as the rule rather than the exception, directly contradicting the transparency principles established by the Access to Information Law—then the first documents related to the Varginha Case will only have their identifying classification codes (CIDICs) disclosed at the very moment their secrecy period expires, in 2021, already reclassified under the same category. As a result, they would remain hidden from society until 2046.

++++++++++
Public Interest and Constitutional Principles
++++++++++

Once again, appealing for public agencies to comply with the constitutional principle of transparency of official acts, as set forth in Article 37 of the Brazilian Constitution, and considering that maintaining secrecy over information related to the facts described herein directly undermines that principle, this Request is presented as a matter of high public, scientific, and institutional interest.


Brasília, May 2, 2018, Chico Alencar, Federal Congressman (PSOL – Rio de Janeiro)
 
Last edited:
it seems the military argued there was nothing to be retrieved (in terms of information/documents about their role back in 1996), but extended the period in which the docs pertaining to this event were classified (which is a contradiction, of course). ...To help with presenting my point, I am going to translate only what said Congressman asked (full text below):
External Quote:

The undersigned formally requests from the Minister of State for Defense information regarding the identification, location, and brief description of the contents of any documentation containing evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information, produced by military or civilian personnel, and currently held under the custody of the Brazilian Army.

This request applies to documents originated and classified during the years 1996 and 1997, as well as to documents produced in subsequent years insofar as they are correlated to those earlier records.

Mr. President,
Pursuant to the applicable parliamentary rules, I respectfully request that Your Excellency, after consultation with the House leadership, formally seek from the Minister of State for Defense detailed information concerning the identification, physical or archival location, and concise content summary of all documentation containing evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information, generated by military or civilian personnel, under the custody of the Brazilian Army, and originated and classified between 1996 and 1997, as well as in later years where such documentation may be related.

Specifically, this request concerns documentation generated under the authority of the Eastern Military Command (Comando Militar do Leste) and its subordinate commands, particularly within the 4th Military Region / 4th Army Division, to which the Army Sergeants School (Escola de Sargentos das Armas – ESA) is subordinated.

(My emphasis).

That is an extraordinarily wide remit!

The request later makes clear (under "Justification") that it is inspired by interest in the Varginha UFO case, but the Justification is after the substantive part of the request, which does not ask for documents specific to the claimed Varginha UFO/related events.

Even if the request is only really for information from the 4th Military Region (most of Minas Gerais state, see "Eastern Military Command (Brazil)", Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Military_Command_(Brazil)) it includes (as is explicitly stated in the request) summaries, and the location of all "evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information" records of the Escola de Sargentos das Armas, Brazil's national academy for career NCOs ("Brazilian Army Non-Commissioned Officer Academy", Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Army_Non-Commissioned_Officer_Academy) for 1996 and 1997, and anything later "correlated to those earlier records".

If Policia Militar records are meant to be included (which in the context seems likely), that means in effect summaries of the majority of "policing" evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information records from 1996 and 1997, and any connected later records, for that state, which includes Belo Horizonte, a city of 2.4 million people (approx. 6 million in the wider metropolitan area).

So information about victims of crime, informers, undercover operations, suspects... ...remember, any and all "evidentiary, operational, functional, or personal information" records. Because of a UFO story. The request is either amazingly naïve or just plain thoughtless.

The request says
External Quote:

The scope of this request expressly includes:
Documents classified under the secrecy legislation in force at the time;
Documents that were later reclassified;
Documents whose classification periods were extended from that time until the enactment of Brazil's Access to Information Law (No. 12,527/2011);
Documents currently subject to restricted access under the Access to Information Law, related decrees, regulations, ordinances, and subsequent instructions.

Again, any and all documents, regardless of classification, including many police (i.e. all PM) records relating to a population of millions.

It is hard to imagine any sensible (or halfway responsible) authority agreeing to this request.
 
Last edited:
From what I understood, when you also make a "FOIA" request (in the U.S.), you have to be very specific about what you want (dates, names, and further details that can make it easier to locate, too, otherwise it's kinda like asking for all books from the Library of Congress), so to request everything possible, is not only being unreasonable, it's also a dumb strategy. It's quite different from what was mentioned by an individual in post #165.

The problem with asking anything specific is that, of course, regardless if we are in Brazil, the United States or anywhere else, the military will ALWAYS deny providing us (ufologists included) any sensitive data (or any information AT ALL) about their "secret" / "classified" (whatever they call it) operations, or even acknowledging they happened in the 1st place.

And it doesn't matter if there is a law allowing the release of said files. They will always reply there are no records, or will get rid of them, if they ever exist. The only ones kept (by them) are, ironically, about the entire life of the individuals that are considered enemies, in the past sent to "gulags". You can all bet those will be registered and preserved for centuries. All other information that can at least tell us what remotely happened in Varginha back in 1996, will be denied access, if not destroyed.

It's the same script seen in other UFO cases, the military never provide anything AT ALL, and not just brazilian events, you have seen what I pointed for the 2004 Nimitz one (Tic-Tac, David Fravor...). Multiple people that worked back then said, too, there was a cover-up, which included wiping data/records or seizing all that could tell what they were doing.

Spending any money to get relevant information from them is futile.

So, don't blame only the conspiracy theorists, UFO grifters, liars, etc. for such stories still alive decades later. It's the military's fault for being so secretive. All their excuses for acting that way don't convince anyone. For sure they must have done something illegal and bad/contrary to people's interests.

If it was any other institution, we would be calling it a criminal organization.

Because it's the military, we love to pretend it's for "our own good". Yeah, right...
 
Last edited:
And it doesn't matter if there is a law allowing the release of said files. They will always reply there are no records, or will get rid of them, if they ever exist. The only ones kept (by them) are, ironically, about the entire life of the individuals that are considered enemies, in the past sent to "gulags". You can all bet those will be registered and preserved for centuries. All other information that can at least tell us what remotely happened in Varginha back in 1996, will be denied access, if not destroyed.

It's the same script seen in other UFO cases, the military never provide anything AT ALL, and not just brazilian events, you have seen what I pointed for the 2004 Nimitz one (Tic-Tac, David Fravor...). Multiple people that worked back then said, too, there was a cover-up, which included wiping data/records or seizing all that could tell what they were doing.

Spending any money to get relevant information from them is futile.

So, don't blame only the conspiracy theorists, UFO grifters, liars, etc. for such stories still alive decades later. It's the military's fault for being so secretive. All their excuses for acting that way don't convince anyone. For sure they must have done something illegal and bad/contrary to people's interests.

If it was any other institution, we would be calling it a criminal organization.

Because it's the military, we love to pretend it's for "our own good". Yeah, right...
Can you provide evidence of this, rather than just spouting an opinion. i.e. that an FOIA request has been made, that has been met with a response that there is nothing to be provided, for which there is evidence that there was something to provide after all.
 
It's the same script seen in other UFO cases, the military never provide anything AT ALL, and not just brazilian events, you have seen what I pointed for the 2004 Nimitz one (Tic-Tac, David Fravor...). Multiple people that worked back then said, too, there was a cover-up, which included wiping data/records or seizing all that could tell what they were doing.

Clearly, as @BoulderRiver has informed us up-thread, the behavior of the Brazilian military in the past has contributed to the distrust of what they say, and I'm not defending the Brazilian military. However, you repeatedly engage in this classically conspiratorial way of thinking, where the absence of evidence you believe exists becomes evidence of a cover-up. It's ultimately unfalsifiable. A continued lack of evidence never points to a lack of evidence, rather to the existence of ever more evidence that is always hidden.

You make this claim repeatedly with the Nimitz case. A couple of guys reported technicians taking some recordings. IF, as is likely, there were new or updated systems being tested prior to deployment, this sounds reasonable. The enlisted men making these claims would NOT have had ANY knowledge of data wiping. Yet, your contentions is not only did this happen, the entire US government needs to be involved to ferret out the evidence of this. Anything short of a complete dissemination of evidence of the cover-up is by default evidence of a cover-up.

If there is no evidence of a cover-up, it means there is a cover-up. It's unfalsifiable and very conspiratorial.
 
Can you provide evidence of this, rather than just spouting an opinion. i.e. that an FOIA request has been made, that has been met with a response that there is nothing to be provided, for which there is evidence that there was something to provide after all.
If you are talking about the David Fravor (Nimitz, 2004) case, those FOIA requests can be found in the PDF "A Forensic Analysis of Navy Carrier Strike Group Eleven's Encounter with an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle", available here (DROPBOX LINK).

I don't know about 2004, but as I explained in the Tic-Tac thread, destroying military or government records (even classified ones) is illegal. Classification does NOT authorize destruction, so such records are still federal records and are protected by law.

If you are in doubt, check the 18 U.S. Code § 2071. Or perhaps the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapters 21, 29, 31 and 33), or the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. § 793).

When they lie and say they haven't found anything (it's funny how no records exist for anything these criminals do), this is a felony, obstruction of justice...

Things would be different if members of the U.S. Congress were more interested in anyone that worked in those ships back then (at least listen to what they say = conclusions are left for later), instead of just inviting Fravor/Dietrich and acting like stupid clowns with ridiculous assessments of "interdimensional beings".

If americans pay 1 trillion every year for the military to do what they do, how much they also spend for this circus / mockery, by the Congress?

Instead of doing serious research into all their crimes (which don't need aliens to happen), this is how they spend their time.

I don't need to further explain how in a backwards country like Brazil, especially in the 1990s, it would be easier for them to do some shenanigan and decades later no one finds out. It gets a lot harder, too, when grifters and lunatics are helping more and more to discredit what we can all see it's a real (not fake) conspiracy, of whatever they were doing in Varginha.

If this was a real creature, not an alien, it could only be, if not a human, a primate embryo subjected to genetic, chemical, or environmental interference (deliberate or accidental), resulting in severe congenital abnormalities, making the organism non-viable for its intended research purpose.

Why?

Primates are the only realistic starting point for anything bipedal and vaguely humanoid. It wasn't intentionally designed to look "odd" (red eyes, alien traits, etc.). It wasn't, too, an intentional hybrid (human-animal or animal-animal).

So that could explain:

- 1) Abnormal cranial growth (large head);

- 2) Malformed limbs (three fingers), as described by Saulo José Machado years ago, and he claims to have participated in the capture:
https://g1.globo.com/mg/sul-de-mina...afirmam-aparicao-conhecida-mundialmente.ghtml

(There's a video interview in this link)

- 3) Skeletal irregularities (protrusions)

- 4) Poor coordination or fragility

- 5) The red eyes and how it smell...

For example:

- Oligodactyly (missing digits) happens in humans, primates, mammals generally. It's a classic developmental error, not evidence of mixing species. This man SAULO mentions the alien appeared to have 3 fingers.

The problem with all this is that they claim multiple aliens were spotted, that there was an alien spaceship shot by the U.S. (funny how it landed here in Brazil), the fact the U.S. already knew what it was, so attacked (if this were humans, why? Kill first, ask questions later? That means prior knowledge), the explanation they (and the MEN IN BLACK) quickly went to Varginha to retrieve the aliens (more than one! Not just the creature seen by the 3 girls) and all equipment...

The witnesses inconsistencies... That's why I can't affirm or deny anything, it's all inconclusive * in my opinion.

* Except that doesn't mean NOTHING HAPPENED and it's all a bunch of wild tales. Something did.
 
Last edited:
If this was a real creature, not an alien, it could only be, if not a human, a primate embryo subjected to genetic, chemical, or environmental interference (deliberate or accidental), resulting in severe congenital abnormalities, making the organism non-viable for its intended research purpose.

Yet kept alive for several years. Why?
It's a grim subject, but surely it's more likely a primate damaged by experimental processes would be "euthanised" and dissected.

And despite "malformed limbs", "skeletal abnormalities" and "poor coordination or fragility", and no experience of the outside world, it is able to escape from an ultra-secret, (presumably) high-security facility and make its way to an area of Varginha without being seen except by the three young women.

Maybe it's more likely they misidentified something or someone.
 
Yet kept alive for several years. Why?
It's a grim subject, but surely it's more likely a primate damaged by experimental processes would be "euthanised" and dissected.

And despite "malformed limbs", "skeletal abnormalities" and "poor coordination or fragility", and no experience of the outside world, it is able to escape from an ultra-secret, (presumably) high-security facility and make its way to an area of Varginha without being seen except by the three young women.

Maybe it's more likely they misidentified something or someone.
It gets worse, it appears they put all those creatures (more than one, contrary to what you are implying) in a cigar-shaped object in distress, which crashed into a field near Varginha... :rolleyes:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...coming-forward-creature-brought-hospital.html

There are three possibilities: 1) The craft never existed and it's all a lie from the couple that saw (and Carlos de Souza); 2) It was an alien craft and somehow got damaged and the aliens managed to escape (reports say they saw smoke coming from it), or 3) All the rest about this case is true, except this (because if that bit also happened, my theory about a modified animal makes no sense). I don't think we have a 4) there was a flying object, but it wasn't of alien origin.

And if we put modified creatures in such flying object, what would be the purpose? Test their strength? Or if they were intelligent enough to operate machinery? And if they were all aliens, how were they able to control their own ship in the 1st place? Using the Power of the Force? Perhaps entering our atmosphere made them crash (so, no human interference in what went wrong). Were they all hibernating or the UFO worked on auto-pilot?

If the military shot (how?) said alien craft, that can only mean they knew the ALIENS existed in the 1st place. There's no way someone would get trigger happy and a while later said craft would slowly cross Brazil, so they retrieved everything to send it to Area 51...

You know what doesn't help when we start to investigate cases like these?


Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1owwztv/on_purported_ciamen_in_black_involvement_in_the/

From that thread:

Brazilian Air Force air traffic control officer Mr. José Manuel Fernandez tells Mr. James Fox in Moment of Contact (2022):

"What I know… USAF (United States Air Force) lands in Campinas. A USAF airplane lands in Campinas. And two helicopters took off from Campinas airport to an unknown place. Afterward, we learned that it was the city of Varginha. It landed, collected something, nobody knows what, returned to Campinas, put it in the USAF airplane, took off and left. And the mission was… what they told us: 'Silence. Total silence.'"

Who was involved:

"Only Americans. Only. The Brazilians supported only the ground operation. What was collected is not known. But something was rescued.""

How he knows that Americans were involved:

"Because they landed without authorization of the Brazilian government. It was a secret mission. And it was a USAF airplane.""

Mr. Fox tells Mr. Ross Coulthart:

"We have the flight control officer who said that the USAF, which is the United States Air Force flight, came in and it didn't have authorization from the Brazilian government to land. And a higher level government official, Brazilian, walked in and said:

"Let the plane land."

So, we put out a FOIA request for all air flights in America that came into Brazil from the 14th, I think it was the 13th to the 27th or something like this. And it took three years for our team to get that response. And it came back from the CIA, and it's like basically "It's a national security issue. It's classified. And your request is denied."
The next time you read about any wild UFO / alien story, remember who are the people that try to hide the truth about them. Remember which people are doing everything possible so any debunking NEVER HAPPENS. ;)
 
Last edited:
If you are talking about the David Fravor (Nimitz, 2004) case, those FOIA requests can be found in the PDF "A Forensic Analysis of Navy Carrier Strike Group Eleven's Encounter with an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle", available here
A Dropbox link to something from the "Scientific Coalition for Ufology"? Really? This is their (inconclusive) conclusion, leaning heavily on the credentials of the witnesses. We also are given the classic line, "acceleration ... beyond the capabilities of any known aircraft..." based on "testimonies".
IMG_3568.jpeg
 
Last edited:
@Perene 's Dropbox link, continued:

Following the conclusion is this paragraph of acknowledgements. Erol Faruk is a UFO believer from years back, and Brandon Reddell is a "day-age" creationist. Hal Puthoff is described as a "parapsychologist", and his work on "remote viewing" has often been described.

IMG_3570.jpeg
 
Last edited:
There are three possibilities: 1) The craft never existed and it's all a lie from the couple that saw (and Carlos de Souza); 2) It was an alien craft and somehow got damaged and the aliens managed to escape (reports say they saw smoke coming from it), or 3) All the rest about this case is true, except this (because if that bit also happened, my theory about a modified animal makes no sense). I don't think we have a 4) there was a flying object, but it wasn't of alien origin.
5) People saw something ordinary, perceived it as something extraordinary,and honestly reported what they think they saw.

Please, please, please stop with this false dichotomy that either people are liars or the UFO stories are true. There is also the option that the stories are based on an honest mistake.
 
5) People saw something ordinary, perceived it as something extraordinary,and honestly reported what they think they saw.

Please, please, please stop with this false dichotomy that either people are liars or the UFO stories are true. There is also the option that the stories are based on an honest mistake.

Wow!
 
5) People saw something ordinary, perceived it as something extraordinary,and honestly reported what they think they saw.

Please, please, please stop with this false dichotomy that either people are liars or the UFO stories are true. There is also the option that the stories are based on an honest mistake.

The only conclusion possible for an educated individual with critical thinking who investigates this case without bias

So, don't blame only the conspiracy theorists, UFO grifters, liars, etc. for such stories still alive decades later. It's the military's fault for being so secretive. All their excuses for acting that way don't convince anyone. For sure they must have done something illegal and bad/contrary to people's interests.


Except you would be wrong.
The Brazilian Air Force was one of the first military bodies in the world to release their UFO investigation files, back in 1954.

This tradition continued in the 2000s, when they publicly disclosed eveything they had on UFOs, including Operação Prato.
 
Last edited:
5) People saw something ordinary, perceived it as something extraordinary,and honestly reported what they think they saw.

Please, please, please stop with this false dichotomy that either people are liars or the UFO stories are true. There is also the option that the stories are based on an honest mistake.
Wrong.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMrEvQcDOg4

It's very, very likely someone is LYING, and neither witnesses reported an ordinary flying object (unless you are going to tell me the aliens flew in a dirigible balloon). One thing this behavioral scientist (Ricardo Ventura - from the YT channel "Não Minta Pra Mim" - see above) is really correct is that the first statements (from 1996) are far more relevant / truthful compared to what came later ("tainted" for many reasons). He says Ubirajara at first thought this case had a bit of it, then over time concluded everything had to be a LIE due to many wild tales/fake stories being spread.

Carlos de Souza, which reported said UFO, is mentioned by Ricardo, too, which does not believe what he told everyone - about a military officer pointing a gun at him, threatening to shoot unless he left the crashing site. Ventura explains Carlos may have seen something in the sky, but added more details to embelish his story.

So, Carlos was not very convincing (for example, at one moment he said the officer made the debris from the craft fall from his hand, after moving his weapon closer, so he dropped, and in another CARLOS told us he dropped the piece himself). In his opinion, the opposite of the doctor that said he saw the alien (Ítalo?), which puts himself at the scene.

One of the things mentioned in the above video is that back then Globo showed this 1994 film. However, that was only on "Intercine", precisely on June 4, 1996, at 11 pm. "ROSWELL" has a scene which I'll explain what it's all about:

- In a key flashback sequence tied to the crash site investigation and the mystery of the recovered material, there is a demonstration of the so-called "memory metal" or "memory foil" - a piece of debris from the alleged alien craft. A character (often depicted as Marcel himself or someone showing it to a younger person, such as his son in some recollections, though the film adapts real witness accounts) takes a flat, rectangular piece of metallic-looking material (described as resembling aluminum foil but clearly not ordinary). The person crumples or folds the piece tightly, squeezing/compressing it in their hand.

- When released, the material automatically unfolds/returns to its original flat, smooth shape - without any visible creases, damage, or effort. It "remembers" its form, behaving like a self-healing or shape-memory alloy (a property that witnesses claimed was impossible with 1940s human technology). The scene emphasizes the wonder and impossibility of it: the foil ripples or flows back to perfect flatness, often with a subtle visual effect to show the "liquid-like" or wave-rippling recovery (some descriptions compare it to water ripples or liquid metal behavior while remaining solid).
Do you all remember anything familiar?


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXIXcn_a-rU


It's Carlos de Souza saying back in 1996 a recovered piece also returned to its original shape, once he handled it. So he may have invented this bit based on that film. It's hinted in the 1st video (with Ventura/Edison) I showed, that he may have seen that scene before.
 
Last edited:
It's very, very likely someone is LYING,
Can you share how you are calculating the liklihood?

...and neither witnesses reported an ordinary flying object (unless you are going to tell me the aliens flew in a dirigible balloon).
Do you not think it is possible that somebody could see something strange to them but mundane in the larger world, not be able to figure out what it was, and misinterpret it as, say, aliens flying a dirigible? People make mistakes in observation and interpretation and reporting that seem at least that strange, why not in this case?


One thing this behavioral scientist (Ricardo Ventura - from the YT channel "Não Minta Pra Mim" - see above) is really correct is that the first statements (from 1996) are far more relevant / truthful compared to what came later ("tainted" for many reasons). He says Ubirajara at first thought this case had a bit of it, then over time concluded everything had to be a LIE due to many wild tales/fake stories being spread.
Can you relate how he knows "everything had to be a LIE" as opposed to "everything got increasingly far from reality as people's memories became 'tainted,' while they thought they were still honestly reporting what they think they remember?"

I am not sure if there may be a language issue at play here -- somebody can make a statement that is totally, 100% but not be lying if they believe what they are saying. "Lying" describes telling a story that you KNOW is not true. With that in mind, is your contention that people were knowingly telling untrue stories? If so, how do you know this was intentional on their part, how do you know they are not just honestly wrong?
 
Last edited:
Yet kept alive for several years. Why?
It's a grim subject, but surely it's more likely a primate damaged by experimental processes would be "euthanised" and dissected.

And despite "malformed limbs", "skeletal abnormalities" and "poor coordination or fragility", and no experience of the outside world, it is able to escape from an ultra-secret, (presumably) high-security facility and make its way to an area of Varginha without being seen except by the three young women.

Maybe it's more likely they misidentified something or someone.

It gets worse, it appears they put all those creatures (more than one, contrary to what you are implying) in a cigar-shaped object in distress, which crashed into a field near Varginha... ...And if we put modified creatures in such flying object, what would be the purpose? Test their strength? Or if they were intelligent enough to operate machinery?

Primate intelligence was extensively studied 1960s-80s, including attempts to teach understanding of language (Washoe, Koko, Nim Chimpsky etc.)
Unconnected to this, chimps (and much smaller primates) were used in early spaceflight experiments, notably Ham in a 1961 Project Mercury flight (Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ham_(chimpanzee)). Ham and the other test primates didn't pilot their craft, though.

There is no evidence, anywhere, of any intervention that would enable an ape to learn complex sequential tasks such as flying an aircraft, which is difficult for many humans to do competently. (Some chimps/ orangs have steered motor vehicles in controlled environments; none would be safe on public roads! These set-up driving situations are arguably circus-style entertainments more than anything else).

Any intervention that could massively increase primate intelligence -regardless of the ethics of that research- would be hugely significant. Humans are primates, which is why primates were/ are used in some medical research; findings might be applicable to humans.
Such a breakthrough in 1996 would be known about by now- why do it otherwise? What benefit is there to the researchers?
Is there any evidence that the world's very best neuropharmacologists/ neurosurgeons/ genetic engineers (or whatever) were in Brazil, working on a radical, secret, intelligence enhancement experiment in the 1990s?

Even if the intervention was illegal or unethical, the findings would still be of enormous importance.
There are examples of grossly unethical medical experiments, some involving murder, whose datasets have been subsequently used as they were believed to be of value. At Dachau concentration camp in the Second World War, prisoners were immersed in cold water until death, ostensibly to study hypothermia. It is well-known that the resulting data has been subsequently used/ cited by researchers, although controversially. (The scientific validity of the Dachau findings is also highly questionable).
Nazi Science — The Dachau Hypothermia Experiments, Berger, R.L., 1990, The New England Journal of Medicine 322 (20) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199005173222006

It is profoundly unlikely that there was a secret, astonishingly successful program to boost primate intelligence anywhere in 1996 (or at any other time up to the present). I'd say impossible. Human-animal chimeras (in the sense of living creatures with visible attributes of more than one species) do not exist outside of folklore, mythology, children's stories and science fiction, where they are common.
The Greek myths, horror movies and Disneyland have many examples, but they are not scientifically credible.

A cigar-shaped flying vehicle, capable of housing a number of human-scale beings, would have to be a novel technological development:
No wings, no rotors, so either rocket- or jet- propelled, using vectored thrust for steering. Or a completely revolutionary propulsion system.
And no-one, anywhere, has built a cigar-shaped heavier-than-air craft for atmospheric flight of one human, let alone several.
Brazil's largest aerospace company, Embraer, is a respectable, competent designer and manufacturer, and was in 1996, but it isn't Lockheed or Northrop Grumman.

The hypothesis that a secret revolutionary form of aircraft was developed, capable of accommodating several human-scale passengers, and it was decided to test fly it, over a heavily-populated area, with the malformed results of an equally secret primate experiment as passengers, makes no sense.
Developing a revolutionary aircraft only to use it to do some primate research, or to scare some random people in Brazil, isn't credible.
As with some of the sillier "explanations" of e.g. Roswell (bio-engineered Soviet "crew") there is no evidence, and both the hypothetical creatures and the hypothetical craft are wildly implausible.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top