Yes, which would denote an igniferous (a word we use, and clearly not known by microsoft word) system, which if you now want to introduce igniferous systems into the scenario, you now have a new set of variables. Firstly, you will need flash detonators, which initiate when the match head inside the detonator is exposed to heat and ignites the low explosive, usually PETN. The heat is provided by safety fuse, which is also flammable, which then has to be initiated by something flammable such as a match fusee, flash initiator, pull initiator, grip switches, or if you want a combination of both electric and non electric systems (for reasons unknown) then you could use an ISFE, which is really just like an electric detonator, except instead of exploding, it lights safety fuse and has the same RF hazard considerations as electric detonators, basically nullifying their RF resistance to this scenario. Happy for you to explain how your above quote nullifies my 'fixation' with RF.
I take people at face value, and on here I only debate their beliefs and claims on their merit, or lack of, but don't make assumptions about them. I am a Captain (selected Major) and not an NCO as you assumed incorrectly. I also sincerely meant 'with respect', although that sentiment is now waning somewhat, as I believe we were talking at crossed purposes when I was discussing detonators and your were discussing cellphones. I did answer your question by saying that I would not attempt such a task as it is too implausibly difficult. I can destroy the building with explosives, I doubt I can fit them to the building without anyone noticing. Your opinion of what qualities you think an EOD operator require are irrelevant to the debate, and if it makes you feel any better about my lack of perceived skill, I am not longer permitted to perform EOD tasks due to being wounded in Afghanistan in 2007, and am now only permitted to write policy, training and equipment doctrine, as well as conventional explosive engineering.
I am more than happy to continue the debate, including any further facts you feel I may have overlooked in my 'fixation' with RF, for which nobody on Metabunk has been able yet to get around. I may occasionally use flippant modes of expression such as 'black-ops ninja demolition crew', but I will treat the person that I am debating respectfully, and not cast doubt on their integrity or character. I politely request that you do the same.