The latest chemtrail believer to inadvertently demonstrate that the chemtrail theory is impossible is Russ Tanner, of Global Skywatch.
On his Facebook group he recently posted this:
http://archive.is/3iBQB
He says that to make even a short plume would require tens of thousands of gallons, so it cannot be water being produced from the fuel. So how, then, can it be some chemical sprayed from the aircraft instead? The volume required would surely be similar?
(As for the exact accuracy of his claims: Knollenberg came up with a figure of about 30kg of water per linear metre in a persistent contrail from a small jet, which equates to about 8 gallons of liquid water per metre, or about 2.4 gallons per linear foot. It's not clear what Tanner means by "a short plume 200 feet wide" as he doesn't specify other dimensions, or whether he means a persistent or non persistent trail.)
On his Facebook group he recently posted this:
http://archive.is/3iBQB
He says that to make even a short plume would require tens of thousands of gallons, so it cannot be water being produced from the fuel. So how, then, can it be some chemical sprayed from the aircraft instead? The volume required would surely be similar?
(As for the exact accuracy of his claims: Knollenberg came up with a figure of about 30kg of water per linear metre in a persistent contrail from a small jet, which equates to about 8 gallons of liquid water per metre, or about 2.4 gallons per linear foot. It's not clear what Tanner means by "a short plume 200 feet wide" as he doesn't specify other dimensions, or whether he means a persistent or non persistent trail.)
Last edited by a moderator:
