MikeG
Senior Member.
A friend forwarded this link to Russ Tanner’s Global Skywatch.
He is now claiming that chemtrails are being altered to “short non-persistent plumes to fool the public.”
http://globalskywatch.com/stories/m...l-information/plumes-change.html#.VbpXMCSar-b
But he doesn’t stop there.
This reminds me somewhat of Dane Wigington’s claim that there is no more “virtually no natural weather” occurring because of geoengineering.
http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/02...ails-climate-engineering-and-weather-warfare/
What Tanner has done, at least from what I can see, is remove the need for any debate over distinctions between contrails and chemtrails. Essentially, everything in the sky, no matter what form it takes, is a chemtrail, including “personally witnessed” invisible chemtrails.
By this, I think he means the chemtrails that he can smell within 20 minutes of spraying, although how the timeline works with "non-visible" chemtrails is a little sketchy.
It seems we are now reducing the discourse to our sense of smell rather than sight.
He is now claiming that chemtrails are being altered to “short non-persistent plumes to fool the public.”
http://globalskywatch.com/stories/m...l-information/plumes-change.html#.VbpXMCSar-b
But he doesn’t stop there.
http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/02...ails-climate-engineering-and-weather-warfare/
What Tanner has done, at least from what I can see, is remove the need for any debate over distinctions between contrails and chemtrails. Essentially, everything in the sky, no matter what form it takes, is a chemtrail, including “personally witnessed” invisible chemtrails.
By this, I think he means the chemtrails that he can smell within 20 minutes of spraying, although how the timeline works with "non-visible" chemtrails is a little sketchy.
It seems we are now reducing the discourse to our sense of smell rather than sight.