I know its rubbish, in terms of the CT's put out there about HAARP. But I thought I remembered someone reputable on this forum stating there were another 29 facilities similar to HAARP. Whether they exist or not, I don't care...
I know its rubbish, in terms of the CT's put out there about HAARP. But I thought I remembered someone reputable on this forum stating there were another 29 facilities similar to HAARP. Whether they exist or not, I don't care...
The exploration/utilization of the ionosphere is truly a huge topic, in general.
As to the HAARP project, being from Alaska, I've watched the HAARP DARN project fairly carefully. I also have a friend who is an absolute genius in just the field of electronics - and, I'm reasonably educated in electronics, myself.
My friend (given to being highly suspicious) took a public tour of the facility, concluding that there was no evidence of anything but associated on-off switches; which controlled the RF transmission power to the antenna array. However, he agreed with me that if you can control the "Rover" on Mars with a few hundred watts of transmission power - at the most - that the RF power capability of the HAARP cannon was nothing short of "Striking Power."
The key to understanding the HAARP project is to recall that it was a solar flare, which heated the upper-earth 'atmosphere' (ionosphere – visually evidenced by the Aurora/Australias Borealis) such that it created an 'atmospheric drag' on the first US Space Station. In consequence, the Space Station began an increasing cycle of oscillations; until it finally fell out of orbit - no thanks to the uncaring of Jimmy Carter.
Again, the Gakona, Alaska site radiates millions of watts of RF energy - powered by its own Fairbanks-Morse diesel power generating facility, very close by. That magnitude of RF power is not the 'stuff' of research; it's a bloody "RF cannon"!
In concert, the DARN system monitors the 'state' of the upper atmospheric particle belts – that being the true "research." However, the DARN system essentially monitors the before/after state of the particle belts, relative to a HAARP firing.
However, there are numerous DARN facilities, scattered as far as the tip of South America. It's reasonable that the effect of the HAARP Cannon(s) produces a 'ripple' effect in the upper particle belts; with the DARN system plotting any detectable changes for primary research; and, of course, prediction/calibration for the HAARP Cannon. The DARN system – or anything similar – would also serve to 'spot' any other 'entity's tampering with the ionosphere; just as the seismic detection for spotting underground nuclear tests.
The clear implication is that the HAARP Cannon essentially effects a 'blister' in the ionosphere, enabling a radical (localized) increase in the solar energy to reach the earth. The "firing site" then rotates out from under the 'blister,' with the solar 'consequence' occurring off to the West, i.e. Siberia & beyond.
The ionosphere, however, is naturally subject to the formation of ripples/waves. Thus, the directional "electronic agility" of the HAARP 'beam' can effect a certain amount of north-south ripple effect, as well.
In the background, the theory behind the HAARP project was 'borrowed' from the Russians (even though an American took out several patents on the concept), although the Russians couldn't afford to build it – which would have been done in secret, anyway. AND, the Russians have been quite vocal as to the HAARP cannon being uniquely a "Weather Control" system; in defiance of International Law – acclaimed/disguised as "research," of course. (Rather like the 'tests' of the atomic bombs over Hiroshima & Nagasaki.)
The last I knew, two more HAARP facilities were at least planned to be built in Greenland and Tromso, Norway - at the same latitude as the Gakona site. In theory, that latitude marks the average intersection of the ionosphere with the magnetosphere.
Interestingly, the 'coupling' of a magnetic field and a radio frequency is the same principle employed by medical MRI imaging. The implied theory being that the 'particles' in the ionosphere would be 'heated,' but, given the obvious mechanics, would only be able to have a 'propulsive' action-reaction effect against the relatively more dense upper atmosphere, however thin; versus any 'upward' energy radiation being 'lost' to the inversely dense higher altitude (outer space) – quite comparable to a helium balloon.
In theory, also, the ionospheric 'distortion' could also cripple the Russian "Over the Horizon" radar and/or communication.
However, there are other similar "ionospheric" projects, under different 'titles,' and technology; at least one being in Russia. Not surprisingly, the militarization of space – contrary to treaties & International law – began a long time ago. For all the similar projects, HAARP is unique by virtue of its magnitude of RF power.
As evidence of the HAARP system being a weather-controlling device, the Canadians were otherwise inexplicably confident enough to open new ports in the Canadian North Atlantic coast region; which was previously icebound. Such a move requires enormous confidence. There's currently an international legal battle, as to who can use the associated new 'inland' sea routes; with Canada, of course, claiming control - similarly to that exercised over the Panama canal.
As to the really far-out HAARP "conspiracy theorists;" they are essentially "disinformationists." But, their claims are still worthy of being examined. We live in an incredibly complex world; with a global "Next-Generation Nazism" being seen in every evening newscast. God bless those who employ close scrutiny; asking: "What if ….?"
