Debunked: Nasa: Strange Markings Across The Globe 'Might Have Been Made By Aliens'

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
NASA did not say that ancient rock carvings were made by aliens. They did not say even say they might have been made by aliens. They simply said that they were made by humans that we know so little about (as it was so long ago) that they might as well have been made by aliens.



Here's exactly what NASA said:

http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/f...ogy_and_Interstellar_Communication_TAGGED.pdf (page 241 [pdf page 271])
Note that NASA makes clear this is a parallel from human existence - they are talking about markings made by humans that we know nothing at all about. So for all intents and purposes, they might as well be considered aliens (or angels, or fairies, or goblins).

They are simply saying we don't know anything about the old human carvings, so the degree of our interpretation of what they mean might be similar to our understanding of possible communication. Like if we get a signal from space - we might be able to discern some mathematical relationship it contains (like the ancient human carvings being concentric circles. But we can't tell if there is some additional meaning to the particular arrangement (the orbits of planets, or some pretty circles).

The example they give, the Doddington Moor rock art, is something that all scientists agree is human in origin. There's nothing to suggest otherwise - it's primitively carved in rocks, in places where humans lived. We just don't know what it means, because it's so old.

The NASA book contains a jokey little footnote to the "made by aliens" sentence:
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Jason

Senior Member
Great work Mick! Do they actually know how old the carving is? How did you come across this publication that was editted by Douglas A. Vakoch titled; "Archaeology, Anthropology, and Interstellar Communication". What is the purpose of this publication? And when I checked the tagged page 241 to read about this carving it wasn't located on that page, instead it discussed intelligence and animal intelligence. Its 330 pages long so its not easy to find...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jason

Senior Member
The Huffington Post covered this story as well, and in it they make the distinction that NASA isn't telling us rock art was made by aliens, but that we should draw from it to learn how one might look for signals from other worlds or possibly communicate with other worlds. Absolutely great stuff.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/201...gy-interstellar-communications_n_5362813.html
I also think its really cool to see the similarities in how SETI or NASA try to communicate with interstellar life with the drawings and etches they've made on plaques and what have you with satellites we've sent to space and items we left on the Moon.
 

cosmic

Senior Member.
And when I checked the tagged page 241 to read about this carving it wasn't located on that page...
Probably just a typo; it's on page 242.

Edit: the picture, I mean; the quoted text begins on page 241.
 

Jason

Senior Member
Probably just a typo; it's on page 242.

Edit: the picture, I mean; the quoted text begins on page 241.
I just realized that when I was scrolling down that the pages numbers on each page don't coincide with the scroll page down "thingy" on the right. Maybe its just my computer. Thanks Cosmic
 

cosmic

Senior Member.
Depending on what reader you're using, the page number might not match the document. I did a poor job of explaining though (I'll blame the NyQuil).
 

Jason

Senior Member
Do they actually know how old the carving is?
http://rockart.ncl.ac.uk/
How is it that this website claims they know who is responsible for the rock art, but NASA doesn't know.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
http://rockart.ncl.ac.uk/
How is it that this website claims they know who is responsible for the rock art, but NASA doesn't know.
They don't. The term "Neolithic and Early Bronze Age people in Northumberland" just means the people who lived there are around that time. It's very hard to date these rock carvings, so there's a huge range of possible dates (over 2500 years).

See here for a detailed discussion of rock art dating techniques:
http://archaeology-easterndesert.com/html/rock_art_analysis.html#Dating
 

Jason

Senior Member
They don't. The term "Neolithic and Early Bronze Age people in Northumberland" just means the people who lived there are around that time. It's very hard to date these rock carvings, so there's a huge range of possible dates (over 2500 years).

See here for a detailed discussion of rock art dating techniques:
http://archaeology-easterndesert.com/html/rock_art_analysis.html#Dating
Isn't it almost impossible to date rock art in the form of carvings. The only thing they can date is the rock itself, or study the erosive effects within the carving to come up with an approximate date, but its not exact is it? Most times they date rock art "carvings" by which civilizations were present in the area, based on what we know about them and if they were capable of doing such things, Right?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Who's actually claiming NASA said they might have been made by aliens?
The Blaze
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ient-rock-art-might-have-been-made-by-aliens/
The Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ient-rock-art-created-extra-terrestrials.html
news.com.au
http://www.news.com.au/technology/s...ancient-rock-art/story-fnjwlcze-1226927499237
..... etc.
 

Joe

Senior Member

http://sploid.gizmodo.com/nasa-publishes-fascinating-book-on-how-to-communicate-w-1579396194
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hevach

Senior Member.
You know, NASA's scientists have had so many incidents where their words have been misunderstood because of innocent comparisons being read as literal by the media that you'd think they'd at least stop using words like "alien" in them. It won't stop misunderstandings like the Jelly Doughnut rock or plastic on Mars, but it would have stopped all the ones about aliens and life on Mars or bacteria in meteorites and so on.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
You know, NASA's scientists have had so many incidents where their words have been misunderstood because of innocent comparisons being read as literal by the media that you'd think they'd at least stop using words like "alien" in them. It won't stop misunderstandings like the Jelly Doughnut rock or plastic on Mars, but it would have stopped all the ones about aliens and life on Mars or bacteria in meteorites and so on.
It does get them publicity though. I don't think this is deliberate, however it's a rather dry academic book, and maybe a few more people will read bits of it because of this.
 

Jason

Senior Member
It does get them publicity though. I don't think this is deliberate, however it's a rather dry academic book, and maybe a few more people will read bits of it because of this.
Does anyone know why they came out with this book? Was it something they've been working on or considering doing for quite some time. For me anyway, it just seems a bit odd that NASA would even part take in such a book. Some of the book reads like; How would an ETI view our planet from abroad, and would could they deduce based on the spectroscopic analysis of the light on our planet. How could two worlds communicate with each other, or due to distances and the speed limit of light would it only be one way communication. Even if NASA didn't mean to use the world Aliens deliberately, the book in of itself is a cross roads between us and ETI or vice versa, and how one might expect to communicate, or what to look for in the cosmos to find life...
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Does anyone know why they came out with this book? Was it something they've been working on or considering doing for quite some time. For me anyway, it just seems a bit odd that NASA would even part take in such a book. Some of the book reads like; How would an ETI view our planet from abroad, and would could they deduce based on the spectroscopic analysis of the light on our planet. How could two worlds communicate with each other, or due to distances and the speed limit of light would it only be one way communication. Even if NASA didn't mean to use the world Aliens deliberately, the book in of itself is a cross roads between us and ETI or vice versa, and how one might expect to communicate, or what to look for in the cosmos to find life...
It's a SETI book. SETI is part of NASA. They publish books about SETI, there are three similar books online:
http://history.nasa.gov/seti.html

The whole book is about looking for aliens. They did use the word "aliens" deliberately, it's just that people misunderstood the full context of the paragraph.
 

Jason

Senior Member
It's a SETI book. SETI is part of NASA. They publish books about SETI, there are three similar books online:
http://history.nasa.gov/seti.html
Didn't know that, thanks. Not the SETI part, but that NASA put out books like this prior. But why are they putting out books like this? And if I'm not mistaken SETI hasn't been apart of NASA since 1994, Right? The book doesn't seem very "scientific" considering it is coming from NASA... Alot of postulating, considering, and what if's...
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Didn't know that, thanks. Not the SETI part, but that NASA put out books like this prior. But why are they putting out books like this? And if I'm not mistaken SETI hasn't been apart of NASA since 1994, Right? The book doesn't seem very "scientific" considering it is coming from NASA... Alot of postulating, considering, and what if's...
Yeah sorry, it's not a SETI Institute book, it's a NASA book, but part of their SETI work. The SETI institute itself became independent when it was largely cut from government funding, but NASA still does SETI work. Like:
https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/astep...mentation-for-the-search-for-extraterrestria/

Part of NASA's mission is education. So they publish books.
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/education/about/index.html#.U3-SV5Qv9QA

This book is about the possibility of communicating with aliens, so it necessarily contains a great deal of postulating.
 

Jason

Senior Member
Yeah sorry, it's not a SETI Institute book, it's a NASA book, but part of their SETI work. The SETI institute itself became independent when it was largely cut from government funding, but NASA still does SETI work. Like:
https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/astep...mentation-for-the-search-for-extraterrestria/

Part of NASA's mission is education. So they publish books.
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/education/about/index.html#.U3-SV5Qv9QA

This book is about the possibility of communicating with aliens, so it necessarily contains a great deal of postulating.
What's amazing about this book, and I'm just starting it, is that amount of work and effort that went into gettin the SETI program running, and the cost of 6 to 10 billion dollars. In part thanks to the Drake equation which estimated that there could be as little as 1000 intelligent civilizations or as much as 1 billion civilization residing in our own Milky Way Galaxy. What I find so interesting is the fact that NASA went through such hurdles to get this program going, in conjunction with foreign nations, but there are so many CT involving NASA and aliens it would take me an entire day to list em all. From the CT's perspective, why would NASA dump all this time and money into finding ET's, if they already knew they existed and had the capacity to visit earth. Seems kind of ironic if you ask me. I think this also lays to rest any notions that NASA is hiding information regarding ET's.
 
Only someone who blindly follows and believes Erich von Däniken work without checking to see if anything he is saying is real or true would think the picture at the start of this thread was made by aliens. A patten I have noticed with his books(which I read for a giggle and the great pictures more than anything else) is that he has stopped visiting and talking about parts of the world where their is any living culture that produced that art or buildings. Here in Australia he blow it big time with his first book or 2 by saying that old rock pictures of traditional ceremonial head gear of the Men were pictures of space men with their helmets on in the northern part of this country and he also totally misunderstood what the traditional rock art in Tasmania were about. I am posting this link here about them(page 7 and 8 have the information I am talking about) as some of the rock art does look a lot like the rock art in the picture at the start of this thread.

http://www.tmag.tas.gov.au/__data/a...asmania_ningenneh_tunapry_education_guide.pdf
 

cloudspotter

Senior Member.
Isn't it almost impossible to date rock art in the form of carvings. The only thing they can date is the rock itself, or study the erosive effects within the carving to come up with an approximate date, but its not exact is it? Most times they date rock art "carvings" by which civilizations were present in the area, based on what we know about them and if they were capable of doing such things, Right?
It's a puzzle. These things are dotted all round the area but there's one spot I've been to a few times with quite a few carvings on it and it's right next to one of the many Iron Age hill forts in the area so you'd suppose the markings were also Iron Age. I can't imagine this rock would have been buried under layers that would have allowed them to date the carvings either. Thankfully some of the people I work with are archaeologists so I'll ask ;)


Update: Turns out they have been dated by association with burials (seems stones with these markings have been used as lids of burials with the marked side laid face down) , with monuments and also with excavations
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It's a puzzle. These things are dotted all round the area but there's one spot I've been to a few times with quite a few carvings on it and it's right next to one of the many Iron Age hill forts in the area so you'd suppose the markings were also Iron Age. I can't imagine this rock would have been buried under layers that would have allowed them to date the carvings either. Thankfully some of the people I work with are archaeologists so I'll ask ;)


Update: Turns out they have been dated by association with burials (seems stones with these markings have been used as lids of burials with the marked side laid face down) , with monuments and also with excavations
The link I gave earlier details lots of techniques, mostly very inaccurate:
http://archaeology-easterndesert.com/html/rock_art_analysis.html#Dating
 

Aeribous

New Member

http://sploid.gizmodo.com/nasa-publishes-fascinating-book-on-how-to-communicate-w-1579396194
Look at his hair. There is no way human hands could have designed his hair. Back in the 90's when he was talking about the Bermuda Triangle his hair was slicked back. Some people believe this is proof of his knowledge of ancient aliens because we don't have the technology even today to design hair like that. So some scholars speculate that in the early 2000's he came in contact with ancient aliens and that's why his hair turned into this obvious attempt at cummincation. of course it was ancient aliens what else could it be.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
nickrulercreator [Debunked] Apollo 14 Flag Waving Before Ascent? Science and Pseudoscience 21
P Debunked: NASA Nukes Alien Moonbase UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 15
Santa's sidekick Debunked: Apollo 10 "Space Music" UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 16
Mick West Debunked: AnonSec's NASA Hack, Global Hawk Hijack, Evidence of Chemtrails [Public Domain Data] General Discussion 32
Pete Tar Debunked: Most recent NASA study shows ice growth in Antartica Science and Pseudoscience 15
Josh Heuer Debunked: UFO in NASA live feed [The Moon] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 14
Joe Debunked: Blurred NASA image on Mars [Stitched in part of the Rover] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 13
Mick West Debunked: Giant Bird In Flight On Mars Caught In NASA Billion Pixel View UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 31
Leifer Debunked: NASA cloud chart is faked Contrails and Chemtrails 31
MikeC Debunked: NASA Scientist Admitting 'Chemtrails' for decades (actually Sounding Rockets) Contrails and Chemtrails 17
Chuck Debunked: NASA War Document Exposed (The Future is Now) Conspiracy Theories 290
U Debunked: Moon Landing and NASA Photo - non parallel shadows Conspiracy Theories 13
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top