In post #90 of this thread I addressed a video of dutch's:
https://www.metabunk.org/posts/12155
HAARP ring / Circle Sweep forecast (2am Aug 7, 2012) = Central South Texas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMFs4xK9QSA&feature=channel&list=UL
I explained to Dutch that he was seeing bats and why that was the case. I also provided links and search terms that would allow him to verify what I was telling him instead of expecting a stranger on the internet to accept my word on faith.
Months later he responded:
He blocked me so I could not respond. In his attempt at ridicule he tips his hand. I would expect that he would want to avoid false positives in his search for HAARP or HAARP-like signals on NEXRAD imagery so that he could omit such from his predicitive model. Therefore he should be eager to learn what biological targets look like. Instead he issued a glib dismissal and basically insisted that the mere idea that birds, bugs, bats, etc... show up on weather radar is absurd and laughable. He did that without ever addressing specific points or the fact that aero-ecologists and meteorologists support my interpretation of the radar.
One would think that if he is really searching for truth and really thinks that HAARP and HAARP-like signals are predicitive of future weather events, that he would be building a scientific model and doing some hypothesis testing. In such a model he would need to learn what all the non-precipitation returns look like so he could avoid feeding those into the model as "HAARP" or "frequency pulses". He would then need to do something like pick areas and times to scan for "HAARP type" signals, plot all of the HAARP signals and forecast areas, and then accurately plot the weather. Then he should do a spatial analysis of whether the the weather happens nearer to NEXRADs, TDWR, etc.. that display rings/pulses than to weather radars that did not feature such signals during his sample period. Such an analysis would either help him refine his predictive capabilities or disprove his hypothesis so he can move on to another fruitfull investigation.
He has never done such an analysis. Instead we get "confirmations" where he claims a hit in Norman OK but ignores the dozens of other "rings" and "pulsed areas" that got nothing.
So Dutch, about the radar rings near Austin TX during the summar and fall. If it isn't bats, why to the concentric spreading rings occur exactly where there are known bat colonies? Why have biologists that study the bats claimed that it is bats on the radar if that is wrong? Why wouldn't bats show up on a radar? Why does this particular type of return occur right around sunset if it isn't bats emerging for their nightly foraging run?
Are you incapable of answering? Is that why you only responded with insults?
J/K
