Channing, I have seen mousetraps in schools before. If you want to call me a liar, a disinfo agent, or one of the duped sheeple, that's fine.
Channing, you are clearly doubling down on your "mousetraps aren't in public schools!" theory,you just cant reason with human beings that think mousetraps would be in public schools.
the funny thing is in order to say you believe the sandy hook shootings happened you have to except about 100000 coincidences
Your claim is, mousetraps would not be used in public schools. Now, present your evidence to show WHY they would not and, should not be used in public schools.you just cant reason with human beings that think mousetraps would be in public schools. im done posting here sorry.
Just about any complex event in the 'real world' is comprised of thousands of tiny individual sub-events. When examined closely, that sequence of events would seem impossibly unlikely to have happened precisely that way, but yet it did. It's the detailed deconstruction which makes it all seem so unlikely. If you stub your toe and go back to see how likely it was that the exact sequence of events took place to lead to that 'stubbing', one might conclude that it's statistically impossible for anyone to stub their toe.
I've got a friend who lives 2 streets away from me in Bristol, we hardly ever see each other in the street in our home town, unless we've arranged to meet. But I've bumped into her in random places like central London, a market in Birmingham, a shop in Manchester and strangest of all on a Paris Metro train!You never meet someone totally out of context, say a work colleague whilst on holiday abroad?
the funny thing is in order to say you believe the sandy hook shootings happened you have to except about 100000 coincidences and excuses and mis infos.
It has become apparent at this juncture that mouse traps are common in government schools (and, in some jurisdictions, even required). Regardless, if your best proof that Sandy Hook was Sandy Hoax is a mousetrap, I'd suggest it's time to give it up.
Oh, but I almost forgot - you also have a freeze frame in which some bloke's lower leg is blocked from view by his upper leg!
May I introduce the phrase 'scraping the bottom of the barrel' at this point?
the Mousetrap theory at least isnt as bad as Halbig's 'The school wasn't used because there's no way that easel would be in the hallway like that! I've been a school principal, a vice principal, a teacher,a security expert and a state trooper for decades! We dont put easels in hallways. It's just unheard of!' theory.You picked the right phrase indeed. I didn't think that starting this thread would reveal mouse traps as the tipping point in the Sandy Hook conspiracy. Yea gods.
Why would they have a mousetrap in a place that wasn't being used? Just using your "logic" there.
decided to point out since your layout says "Possible Daycare" that the room wasnt a daycare, it was used as kinda an 'office' for sp. ed/educational assistants/ one on ones.Which as you'll notice by looking at "Walkley Scene Photos" #749 isn't in the way of a fire evacuation plan located on the classroom wall
It's always a good time to point out the absolute film genius of Errol Morris...Related to the "10,000 coincidences" claim, Josiah Thompson, a JFK researcher, discusses coincidences involving famous events.
but he didnt say 100,000 coincidences he said.
and then he goes on to explain his gish gallop, which is incerdibly off topic, except for the mouse trap which actually does tie to the OP. If he wants to discuss coincidences not related to the crime scene photos of the school AFTER the shooting, he can start a new thread.
the funny thing is in order to say you believe the sandy hook shootings happened you have to except about 100000 coincidences and excuses and mis infos. So as "complex" as this conspiracy seems to you and how numerous the actors and players have to be...... well the mistakes and coincidences and *redacted* are pretty numerous.
lets be real you gotta believe that the behavior of the sandy hook residents and every single video edit and weird occurence and the two sets of photos with the same line of kids that evacuated the school twice but suposedly 600 kids were in that building. thats too funny yall. every single time someone talks about the "conspiracy" negatively they say "well itd be so complicated itd be so convuluted theres no way they could pull it off!" ummmm if your willing to except 500 coincidences then they can pull it off.....
Could the mold at the bottom of the door be from many years of a janitors mop, wet with mop water, bumping up against the door?Apologies for not submitting photos in the earlier version of this post.
I was introduced to the Sandy Hook conspiracy subculture a few months ago and find it deeply disturbing. One of its lead proponents, Wolfgang Halbig (who appears quite a few times in Metabunk), recently resurfaced with what he is presenting as new “evidence” of the Sandy Hook “conspiracy,” namely a series of alleged crime scene photos of the school.
A recent interview appears here in its entirety
According to Halbig, the photos basically prove two things:
1. That the dilapidated state of the school demonstrated in the photos made it uninhabitable, therefore again “proving” that the building was abandoned at the time of the shootings.
2. That the pictures also reveal a number of strange anomalies that cannot be explained, again pointing to evidence of a conspiracy.
All that said, I have a few questions:
Are these actual photos of Sandy Hook?
If so, when were they taken and by whom?
What do they actually prove?
there's no evidence it is mold. it is most likely water damage stains due (i think ) to mopping. Unfortunately Mr. Halbig did not ask about the pictures in this thread* at the appeal hearing he recently had.Could the mold at the bottom of the door be from many years of a janitors mop, wet with mop water, bumping up against the door?