MikeC
Closed Account
1) .....
And i do not need to do research, .....
And that makes you a troll IMO - I had thought as much but it is good to have confirmation from you.
Welcome to my ignore list.
1) .....
And i do not need to do research, .....
IT WAS YOUR SIDE THAT SAID IT NOT MEStill waiting for the thread with evidence on "OBL was a close confidante of Pentagon circles."
Where? Any evidence? Ever?
Yes misconstrue, i meant as well you knew, because i do do it whereas you implied i do not, my response was intent of i dont need to "do" what i am alreadyAnd that makes you a troll IMO - I had thought as much but it is good to have confirmation from you.
Welcome to my ignore list.
Great it was YOUR debunkers sides that said the gobbeldy gook that IS fact
and also FACT is that if the suggestions are true, then it is self proving. If OBL had inside help it was inside help how many languages need i put that in ?
It was not me who said it so get the bare facts straight before being a big boy
IT WAS YOUR SIDE THAT SAID IT NOT ME
FUE SU LADO QUE DIJO QUE NO ME
Det var din side, sagde den ikke ME
IL ÉTAIT VOTRE CÔTÉ QUE DIT PAS MOI
This doesn't help you you know lolIT WAS YOUR SIDE THAT SAID IT NOT ME
FUE SU LADO QUE DIJO QUE NO ME
Det var din side, sagde den ikke ME
IL ÉTAIT VOTRE CÔTÉ QUE DIT PAS MOI
I think bmead has misconstrued what that means.T...
He was definitely one of only five people who knew what the plan was. OBL was a part-insider. He was an engineer and a close confidante of Pentagon circles. He knew how to plan a terrorist operation, and had the experience. He knew about US military maneuvers in advance.
...
IT WAS YOUR SIDE THAT SAID IT NOT ME
FUE SU LADO QUE DIJO QUE NO ME
Det var din side, sagde den ikke ME
IL ÉTAIT VOTRE CÔTÉ QUE DIT PAS MOI
Calm down fellas.
Jazzy said
I think bmead has misconstrued what that means.
And this isn't about 'sides' bmead, or shouldn't be, just what's verifiable, and what's verifiable nonsense.