Rarely has it been harder for me not to be snarky about something.In the previous episode, when they shine the laser at the white board you can clearly see it creates the exact same cross shape. Yet they act puzzled when it shows up on the clouds.
See for example Gimlin-Patterson or the MH370 portal.We cannot debunk deliberate faking.
I'd propose a friendly amendment -- if faking is done well, it is hard to debunk. But it is not done particularly well on many occasions, such as when the perpetrators show both the amazing cross in the sky (!!!!) but also show the cross on the screen in a previous episode!We cannot debunk deliberate faking.
In the previous episode, when they shine the laser at the white board you can clearly see it creates the exact same cross shape. Yet they act puzzled when it shows up on the clouds. This episode is ridiculous.
Nice catch! I don't even think the mouse disappeared as much as LIDAR guy shifted in his seat a bit to hide it:LIDAR guy's laptop appearing to shift very slightly to the left and the mouse disappearing
Good catch! Apparently the rope/cable looped on the back of the door hasn't been touched at all. The camera position being the same just suggests there's a designated camera place, but the people are even sitting in the same place.Everything else looks exactly the same, suggesting that what they were planning to do next had, in fact, already happened.
Nice catch! I don't even think the mouse disappeared as much as LIDAR guy shifted in his seat a bit to hide it:
His hand is till on "something", he' just shifted a bit in his seat and obscured the mouse:
Nah, I am talking about the mouse that's between the two laptops. LIDAR guy is the behind the white/silver laptop.
View attachment 69305
Good catch! Apparently the rope/cable looped on the back of the door hasn't been touched at all. The camera position being the same just suggests there's a designated camera place, but the people are even sitting in the same place.
Wouldn't be the first time clouds have appeared as UFOs (e.g. here).This is a 25 second video showing the reaction of the cast, followed by a loop with close-up of a stabilized portion of the video showing clouds moving.
But seriously, what were they thinking? Shine a powerful flashlight into the sky and be surprised there are clouds up there? Whilst forgetting what shape their beam has?
If it's not all a sham—which it may well be—, then it's confirmation bias at work: they are expecting something spooky, and thus subconsciously disregarding everything that is not spooky (including the actual explanation).Gotta remember we're talking about the same show that did this.
Indeed. Just plain fabricated stupid non sense. SadlyGotta remember we're talking about the same show that did this.
I need to do a posting guidelines check for factuality in your post, how well it is supported by the evidence presented.Just plain fabricated stupid non sense.
Gotta remember we're talking about the same show that did this.
Source: https://x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1791844275069866468
Gotta remember we're talking about the same show that did this.
Source: https://x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1791844275069866468
The equipment in question is a mobile security surveillance system manufactured by LVT - LiveView Technologies. The blue light is a security feature to alert intruders to the presence of the equipment on site, and it mimics the blue light of police enforcement as a reminder of its purpose.
I just noticed something vaguely interesting.
Here's an image of the "post experiment briefing" from S05E06 (36:54) where they discussed the "long exposure" images showing interrupted beams.
View attachment 69295
During this discussion they mentioned inviting the Nu-Salt guys back to do more laser cannon and rocket nonsense, which then took place on the very next show.
Here's an image of the "post experiment briefing" from S05E07 (30:43) where they discussed the results from the latest "experiment" where the beam was supposedly blocked at 2000 feet.
View attachment 69296
Now I realise that people in these "reality" television shows always wear the same clothing for continuity purposes, but to me it looks like both of these briefings were filmed at the same time. Everything is positioned in almost the exact same place, with the only real exceptions the missing sunglasses on Kaleb's hat, LIDAR guy's laptop appearing to shift very slightly to the left and the mouse disappearing.
Everything else looks exactly the same, suggesting that what they were planning to do next had, in fact, already happened.
They use this same angle in all of the briefings, and looking at those I can see objects in the background that have shifted, like this one from S05E02 where the JBL speaker has been replaced by a stack of books and something has been affixed to the wall to the right of them. The background objects were never all in the same place from S05E01 through S05E05.
View attachment 69299
They are very careful now to remove all dates and times from screens. This is probably just for continuity reasons, but makes it hard to properly investigate.I never thought of the possibility they may have built a studio set that may or may not even be on the Ranch. These could be staged evidence reviews. It would explain a lot.
Hope this works. I'm a newbie.I just noticed something vaguely interesting.
Here's an image of the "post experiment briefing" from S05E06 (36:54) where they discussed the "long exposure" images showing interrupted beams.
View attachment 69295
During this discussion they mentioned inviting the Nu-Salt guys back to do more laser cannon and rocket nonsense, which then took place on the very next show.
Here's an image of the "post experiment briefing" from S05E07 (30:43) where they discussed the results from the latest "experiment" where the beam was supposedly blocked at 2000 feet.
View attachment 69296
Now I realise that people in these "reality" television shows always wear the same clothing for continuity purposes, but to me it looks like both of these briefings were filmed at the same time. Everything is positioned in almost the exact same place, with the only real exceptions the missing sunglasses on Kaleb's hat, LIDAR guy's laptop appearing to shift very slightly to the left and the mouse disappearing.
Everything else looks exactly the same, suggesting that what they were planning to do next had, in fact, already happened.
They use this same angle in all of the briefings, and looking at those I can see objects in the background that have shifted, like this one from S05E02 where the JBL speaker has been replaced by a stack of books and something has been affixed to the wall to the right of them. The background objects were never all in the same place from S05E01 through S05E05.
View attachment 69299
I don't think so. I think there are two in his pocket in the second photo too, but since he is at a slightly different angle there isn't that distinct reflection off the pen clips as we see in the first one. And in all three photos there appears to be a shadow down the side like you would see with a filled pocket, not the flat surface you'd expect from an empty one. But it's hard to tell, being black on black...The guy by the door (Dragon?) has a different number of things that look like pencils in what appears to be a pocket on his sleeve. First photo: 2 pencils. Second photo: nothing. Third photo: 1 pencil.
Hope this works. I'm a newbie.
The guy by the door (Dragon?) has a different number of things that look like pencils in what appears to be a pocket on his sleeve. First photo: 2 pencils. Second photo: nothing. Third photo: 1 pencil.
I was wondering if a UHD stream might reveal the pixels in the corner of the desktop to be a clock. I suspect that's a vain hope.They are very careful now to remove all dates and times from screens. This is probably just for continuity reasons, but makes it hard to properly investigate.
I was wondering if a UHD stream might reveal the pixels in the corner of the desktop to be a clock. I suspect that's a vain hope.
Would it be too ironic to ask for openness and disclosure?Nope, they blur these out.
I imagine they'd go the FOX news route, "This program is for entertainment purposes only, and not meant to be factual".Would it be too ironic to ask for openness and disclosure?
"This program is for entertainment purposes only, and not meant to be factual".
I don't think so. I think there are two in his pocket in the second photo too, but since he is at a slightly different angle there isn't that distinct reflection off the pen clips as we see in the first one. And in all three photos there appears to be a shadow down the side like you would see with a filled pocket, not the flat surface you'd expect from an empty one. But it's hard to tell, being black on black...
Welcome, newbie!
I never thought of the possibility they may have built a studio set that may or may not even be on the Ranch. These could be staged evidence reviews. It would explain a lot.