Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
Hmmmm . . . you insist that the plane issue is all that is in questioned here . . . it is not . . . common sense indicates there is more information available . . . the Commissioners have all but said the same thing . . . those of us do not think a full and open disclosure has been made . . . therefore, why should we accept the OS at any level . . . They have zero credibility to me and many others . . .No. You should recognize that you can always make questions about anything. What about the robot cats?
Instead of wishing for something that is not going to happen (full access to all CIA and FBI databases), why not try making a case with the evidence you have.
It's a sign of a failed argument that people have to resort to "well maybe there's something we don't know, and since they won't tell us, then that proves it!"
The physical evidence indicates a plane hit the pentagon. The wing impacts and the column damage prove it was not a missile. So the evidence just becomes "there MUST have been more video that showed something".