No, the whereabouts of foreign nationals is no more a matter of the public than the whereabouts of you or me.
I can't tell that to the people who died in the World Trade Center on 9/11 because they are already dead. But in all seriousness, what difference does it make if the whereabouts and information are public knowledge?
I showed you my sources about Glenn Beck and his S.A.O. like, I want to see your sources on these 15,000 Saudis here on student visas otherwise, it's not a matter worth discussing because it can't be proven.
Me too, and Glenn Beck getting the acronym wrong would be a minor issue in itself. But not only did he get it wrong; he told his viewers that the SAO was a special exemption for VIPs so they don't have to be fully vetted which is not at all what an SAO really is. You can't just call this an innocent mistake because he completely changed the definition and purpose of the SAO to suit his narrative. This something that requires thought and you don't just make up things by mistake unless your a compulsive or pathological liar. If he simply did not know what an SAO was, then why did he explain it to his viewers as though he did? Understand that Glenn Beck lied no matter how you spin this.
Why is that relevant to this discussion? Are you just gonna chalk up everything I say to left wing bias because you don't want to address the arguments that I presented which are backed up by facts. I don't think I've seen you back anything up yet in this thread.
Maybe you don't understand what an opinion is because facts are not subject to opinion or popularity contests. Is it somehow Glenn Beck's opinion that an SAO is an exemption for VIPs?
Don't try to change the subject because you can't debate me on this one.