Pie-kun
New Member
Oh Good Grief, Glenn has really started to push it with some of these things.
I used to listen to his radio show long before he ever had any TV deals, it had some political overtones but I would describe it as your typical morning "shock jock" broadcast, more akin to Howard Stern than to Rush Limbaugh. Once he got the HLN show, I noticed more and more conspiratorial content show up and I completely tuned out. Now it seems he's really marketing to that crowd in a big way.
If Glenn thinks this little exchange was placed by Satan (or Soros or whoever), I wonder what he thinks of people like Richard Dawkins being on TV. In my opinion, listening to Professor Dawkins lecture or debate is much more likely to turn someone into an atheist than watching an awkward exchange on CNN ever would. It seems to go outside the bounds of logic to suggest the exchange was anything more than a clever response to a silly question posed by a journalist considering there's really no evidence to suggest otherwise.
I used to listen to his radio show long before he ever had any TV deals, it had some political overtones but I would describe it as your typical morning "shock jock" broadcast, more akin to Howard Stern than to Rush Limbaugh. Once he got the HLN show, I noticed more and more conspiratorial content show up and I completely tuned out. Now it seems he's really marketing to that crowd in a big way.
If Glenn thinks this little exchange was placed by Satan (or Soros or whoever), I wonder what he thinks of people like Richard Dawkins being on TV. In my opinion, listening to Professor Dawkins lecture or debate is much more likely to turn someone into an atheist than watching an awkward exchange on CNN ever would. It seems to go outside the bounds of logic to suggest the exchange was anything more than a clever response to a silly question posed by a journalist considering there's really no evidence to suggest otherwise.