I discovered this talk from last year by Dane Wigington - you only need to watch the first 3 minutes - at 2:18 he shows pictures of the tanks - so i went to geoengineeringwatch and posted a polite question about it - my post appeared with "awaiting moderation" but next day was not to be seen ... so i posted again asking why it had disappeared, and the second question was "gone by lunchtime" ... speaks for itself really ...
I just pointed out that they are ballast tanks, and that the photo's have been taken from the aircraft manufacturer's websites. I included a link to a youtube video by a chemtrailer who has identified the trails coming from scheduled commercial flights and therefore the planes would have passengers and luggage inside, not tanks. So my question was why does he say they are chemtrail tanks? This is the link I posted
My third post was a comment that it is somewhat ironic that a website that claims a huge cover up of a secret program is happening suppresses any discussion that points out a contradiction in their claims ... that one disappeared too, no surprise
My third post was a comment that it is somewhat ironic that a website that claims a huge cover up of a secret program is happening suppresses any discussion that points out a contradiction in their claims ... that one disappeared too, no surprise
I don't think I've ever had a comment accepted by the "moderator" at geoengineeringwatch. If you don't swallow what they say unquestioningly then they don't want to know.
I don't think I've ever had a comment accepted by the "moderator" at geoengineeringwatch. If you don't swallow what they say unquestioningly then they don't want to know.
I recently had someone ask me who I was to even speak to Dane Wignington and how it should be completely expected that he would block comments, since his website is so grande and his position so completely unassailable.
Some anonymous sent some pictures to conspiracyclub.co
Hi Gregg, I follow your in5d website everyday and I’m thankful there are like minded people like yourself who are aware of global things that I have know since I was a little girl. I came across some photos from a trusted source of the inside of planes that are used for chemtrails and I figured if I passed them on to you, you can help spread more awareness with it on your website. Let me know if this is ok with you. Thanks.
When asked if the source would like to elaborate on these photos, I was told:
Unfortunately my source does not want to be known and would rather remain anonymous…I’m sure they have some pretty good reasons and I must respect their wishes. As long as the information gets out there I think that’s the most important thing I’ll send you more photos later on in the day when I have a chance thank you.
Most of the pictures are already debunked in this thread, so I'll post some of the pictures i din't see on a scroll through.
Quite a short search away, this picture shows cloud-seeding equipment.
Aircraft technician Steve Bauer of US company Weather Modification Inc., inspects wing mounted burn-in silver iodide (dry ice) flare racks on a Piper Cheyenne II aircraft before the beginning of cloud-seeding operations at Jakkur Airfield, Bangalore, 17 August 2003. Karnataka's government has contracted the US based company to perform cloud-seeding, which involves the aircraft being piloted into clouds and releasing silver iodide into the cloud, in order to attempt to bring rain to the severe drought hit regions of Karnataka state which is facing a severe drought.
Same here, I didn't get any useful info about this picture. The plane doesnt seem to be military, so i don't think its a chaff dispenser. But I don't know what it is.
As a result of trying to explain I'm now blocked as a troll. Well then.
Same here, I didn't get any useful info about this picture. The plane doesnt seem to be military, so i don't think its a chaff dispenser. But I don't know what it is.
As a result of trying to explain I'm now blocked as a troll. Well then.
WMI racks for ejectable flares are mounted on the belly of the aircraft fuselage. Each rack holds 102 cartridges. When fired, the pyrotechnic is ignited and ejected from the aircraft. In this configuration, the WMI Lear 35A is equipped with four 102-count racks for ejectable glaciogenic pyrotechnics, a total of 408 flares.
Same here, I didn't get any useful info about this picture. The plane doesnt seem to be military, so i don't think its a chaff dispenser. But I don't know what it is
Apart from the 'biohazard' label being a very poor photoshop, correct me if I'm wrong but Al and Ba are not biological matter and therefore not a 'biohazard'.
In the film industry, we are often allowed to peruse those desert "aircraft bone-yards" for spare parts or elements needed, when constructing realistic-looking airplane interiors and exteriors for filming....or to often purchase entire fuselages or flight cabins.
I have not been on those scouts....but I now they happen.
With special arrangement, aircraft boneyard tours are available to almost anybody...... http://www.airplaneboneyards.com/airplane-boneyard-tours.htm
and no "chemical barrels" or secret dispersal units are ever found, as far as I know..
The following is an article about this plane with more photos.
Some extra pictures from the Pilot's View of the DC-3 Dakota in the July issue of FLYER, with Kath Burnham, one of the UK's most experienced active DC-3 pilots and instructors.
I do find the concept of rigging a vintage Dakota up for high altitude 'chemtrail' dispersal even more laughable than the standard chemtrail plane claims.
I do find the concept of rigging a vintage Dakota up for high altitude 'chemtrail' dispersal even more laughable than the standard chemtrail plane claims.
Thanks Mick - I tried searching google for that image but all I could see was chemtrail sites - thought I would be able to find the original or the one on this site - am I doing it wrong?
Thanks Mick - I tried searching google for that image but all I could see was chemtrail sites - thought I would be able to find the original or the one on this site - am I doing it wrong?
did you use "google images"?. also Tineye is another good image search site.
when you drag a photo that is used alot by chemtrail sites, google will automatically put in a chemtrail-like tag
since we arent looking for chemtrail planes you have to delete that part and replace with somethign more generic. In this case i typed in "Metabunk" and the first photo that shows in 'similar images' is the metabunk link
if i type 'cloud seeding' into the search bar (replacing chemtrail planes) you get other sites. a bit hard to see my pop up the photo
if i replace 'chemtrail plane' with "fire" (since they often spray stuff with forest fires) i get
President Trump recently attended the unveiling of the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner, and he was photographed inspecting the interior, complete with ballast barrels.
I had wondered where all these photos had come from.
Having worked on classified electronics projects for the militry as a civillian contractor there seems to be a lot of leaked photos of what should be secret stuff! Their true source is more logical.