Debunked: Pilots Doctors and Scientists tell Truth about Chemtrails

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
So, just a (feeble) attempt at getting to topic? Shasta is still a "thing"??? Seems.....it was a "Town-Hall" type of meeting....about a year ago?

I see Mick's post just up-thread (apologies as I get "up-to-speed").

Perhaps once again, a description of just how many Upper-level Jet Routes exist in that vicinity? To explain the preponderance of (sometimes) persistent contrails, when upper-level conditions are conducive for their formation?
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-only-four-airliner-flights-day-over-mt-shasta-ca.t622/
 

M Bornong

Senior Member.

Public comments on chemtrails are at:
23:45-30:00
33:45-42:25
48:25-49:20

Board response at 49:44, stating that the 3 promises of the board, 1) to record the meeting and send to all representatives, 2) Gather info from Lassen National Park on size of particles tested 3) contact air quality boards find out what is tested and costs if more tests are thought to be needed. All 3 actions were carried out.
 

skephu

Senior Member.
Well, there were about 4 people talking 3 minutes each about the chemtrail issue. But the picture freezes at the beginning of the video, and the audio also cuts off during the talk of the 4th speaker, so I don't know what happened next. Probably nothing. I guess next year they can repeat the whole thing.
 

M Bornong

Senior Member.
Well, there were about 4 people talking 3 minutes each about the chemtrail issue. But the picture freezes at the beginning of the video, and the audio also cuts off during the talk of the 4th speaker, so I don't know what happened next. Probably nothing. I guess next year they can repeat the whole thing.

The video worked fine for me, nothing new was said, same old look up, and Mt. Shasta snow testing 60 thousand times higher than normal for aluminum. The board responded stating they carried out all actions as they promised.
 

skephu

Senior Member.
Thanks, I downloaded the video file and I could watch the relevant parts. The board said they had sent the results of the actions to Kimberly Steele (sp?) in a letter last year. But it looks like nobody knows what's in that letter :)
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Thanks, I downloaded the video file and I could watch the relevant parts. The board said they had sent the results of the actions to Kimberly Steele (sp?) in a letter last year. But it looks like nobody knows what's in that letter :)

Looking at Kimberley Steele's Facebook page, most of her timeline is promoting herbal remedies, essential oils etc, which she sells (or at least gets commission for) via her site here: http://www.mydoterra.com/kimberlysteele/#/ Cui bono? :)

She talked about the meeting too:

upload_2015-7-1_10-39-15.png
upload_2015-7-1_10-39-43.png
 

Balance

Senior Member.
Thanks, I downloaded the video file and I could watch the relevant parts. The board said they had sent the results of the actions to Kimberly Steele (sp?) in a letter last year. But it looks like nobody knows what's in that letter :)

I "stalked" Kimberly's FB page looking for it but it's so plastered with meme's I gave up. I did see a copy of the letter the BOS apparently sent out to "all concerned officials" as requested but other than that, found nothing about the other two promises. The actual FB event page drumming up support seemed to have stopped posting around August last year.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Dane Wigington reports on the meeting: Shasta County Update On Heavy Metal Contamination, The Legal Ramifications, including a video from KRCR TV.
chemtrail theory is so confusing.

so. testing tests elements.
an element is an atom.
a molecule is 2 or more atoms stuck together.

the wiki nanoparticle article says:
so... how is a nanoparticle smaller than an element? or are they saying the Lessen equiptment..um, the nanoparticles fly through the equiptment catching filters? so even though the chemtrailists rain and soil tests "find" this nanoparticle aluminium, strontium etc.. the Lessen equiptment can't?

and...if chemtrailist approved testing can be done for 45,000 the first year and 32,000 each year after, can the chemtrailists just raise money for that instead of movies nobody watches? is that the right testing they want?
 

MikeG

Senior Member.
Dane Wigington reports on the meeting: Shasta County Update On Heavy Metal Contamination, The Legal Ramifications, including a video from KRCR TV.

It also looks like he is wielding the threat of legal liability to move the county supervisors.

I hope they do it. Then the "mountain" of evidence can be examined on its merit in a public forum.
 

skephu

Senior Member.
or are they saying the Lessen equiptment..um, the nanoparticles fly through the equiptment catching filters?
PM10 and PM2.5 (particles smaller than 10 or 2.5 micrometers) are routinely measured. That would include nanoparticles, although I'm not sure how the test methods catch them. Anyway, recently there has been some research about particles smaller than 0.1 micrometers (100 nanometers) potentially being of concern regarding health effects. It's not enough to measure the mass of these particles as their surface is what counts. But the research about possible adverse health effects of nanoparticles is still not clear and not settled, so even though they could be measured, we have nothing to compare the values to. There are no reference values or limits.

Nanoparticles are everywhere, we are all breathing them in right now. They are part of nature. In fact, the majority of nanoparticles in the environment come from nature. Human activity only adds a little. So when measuring nanoparticles, separating those from natural sources from those that were added by human activity is quite hard, and would require additional analysis. Laser printers are known to produce a lot of nanoparticles, but even if you just light a candle, it will release lots of nanoparticles into the air while it burns.

So yes, they could be measured, and something would be found. But we wouldn't know where it's coming from and what its effects are. Anyway, Wigington et al. would complain as they also complain about normal amounts of aluminum in rainwater. It would not prove anything.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Anyway, recently there has been some research about particles smaller than 0.1 micrometers (100 nanometers) potentially being of concern regarding health effects
thats where my understanding is breaking down. if the atomic radius of ALuminum is 118pm... how do you make an atom smaller than itself? and still have it be aluminum?
ara.PNG
http://www.periodictable.com/Properties/A/AtomicRadius.v.wt.html



is 118pm smaller than PM10?
from the shasta meeting minutes:
lasssenmeeting.PNG
 

skephu

Senior Member.
is 118pm smaller than PM10?
Yes, a lot smaller. pm is for picometer, PM is for Particulate Matter.
118 pm = 118*10-12​ m = 1.18*10-10​ m.
PM10 is 10 micrometers = 10*10-6​ m = 10-5​ m.
So PM10 is 100,000 times as big as an atom in diameter.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Yes, a lot smaller. pm is for picometer, PM is for Particulate Matter.
118 pm = 118*10-12​ m = 1.18*10-10​ m.
PM10 is 10 micrometers = 10*10-6​ m = 10-5​ m.
So PM10 is 100,000 times as big as an atom in diameter.

Yes, PM is nothing to do with pm. Confusing, but to keep these units in order, they go down in factors of 1,000:

1 metre = 1000 millimetres (mm)
1 millimetre = 1000 micrometres (µm)
1 micrometre = 1000 nanometres (nm)
1 nanometre = 1000 picometres (pm).

So the atomic diameter (twice the atomic radius) of those metal atoms is in the range of about 200 to 400 picometres, or 0.2 to 0.4 nanometres.

Using the same units, PM10 is 10,000 nanometres, which may be easier to read than the scientific notation above.

Edit to add: the same prefixes apply to all SI units, including grams (see the common milligram/microgram confusion in aluminium readings!)
 
Last edited:

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
Wigington plans a Hootenany around the middle of August to be held at an auditorium in Redding. He will have details on his next propaganda show.

It is just very sad to see him ignore that the elements his followers find in rain water are commonly found in the soil under their very feet. Every time one of them works in The Good Earth they get exposed to the elements of their Mother.

They have also carried on a myth that nonoparticles "pass right through" HEPA air filtration, which is definitely a FALSE claim.

The problem of environmental control of nanoparticles has been studied because people regularly work with them and need to be assured of protection:

 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
just because you made me have to look something else up :)
Sorry about that. When you've worked in a field for years you tend not to even notice that words you see as plain English are actually jargon!

Metric and SI aren't strictly interchangeable, but close enough for most purposes.
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
Thanks, I downloaded the video file and I could watch the relevant parts. The board said they had sent the results of the actions to Kimberly Steele (sp?) in a letter last year. But it looks like nobody knows what's in that letter :)

Something is in that letter that someone doesn't want you to know about!
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
It also looks like he is wielding the threat of legal liability to move the county supervisors.

I hope they do it. Then the "mountain" of evidence can be examined on its merit in a public forum.

I agree, it can only result in a disaster for them. Then they move the goalposts or blame it on the "Power Structure" being too powerful. Now the conspiracy extends to the former Redding Chief of Police, a female cattle rancher with a Masters degree in Agriculture, former Mayor of Redding, and the Pastor of a small town community church. According to Dane Wigington, all of these people who make up the Board of Supervisors deserve to be sued for not taking him seriously.

If past is prologue, the show won't get on the road:

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/...unty-california-for-ignoring-chemtrail-tests/

First off they have to show "contamination", which they will not be able to do.
The whole thing is a lose-lose for them. Two outcomes, which is worse?

1. the suit goes nowhere, they suck up money and time only to fail like they always did before.
2. The suit ensues and is heard in court, only to find that their "evidence" is faulty, they can't show any evidence of anything out of the ordinary. Worse yet for them, they get to see that the "Mountain of Evidence" is bunk.
 

BombDr

Senior Member.
New video from my favourite CT, Dahboo 7.

This one is a new angle I had not previously heard of, but he is claiming that he has 'scientific proof' that chemtrails are actually coal ash, and that it is being transported by train and loaded into aircraft worldwide...

Its a new one on me!
 

M Bornong

Senior Member.
It looks like Mark McCandlish has taken his own life. McCandlish.jpg

Sounds like a very sad ending.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
TWCobra Pilots for 9/11 Truth-"Simulations" video debunked. 9/11 26
TWCobra Debunked: Pilots for 9/11 truth WTC speeds 9/11 94
TWCobra Debunked: Photo of pilots protesting chemtrails - it's Photoshopped Contrails and Chemtrails 3
T AiG Debunked: Fossils Fail to Find Major Transition From Dinosaurs to Birds Science and Pseudoscience 4
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 67
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition Explosion Before Collapse of South Tower 9/11 8
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosion in South Tower Lobby 9/11 7
Marc Powell Debunked: Mysterious Explosion Before the Flight 11 Crash 9/11 48
J.d.K Debunked: Marx: "The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way... They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust" Quotes Debunked 0
dimebag2 Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 74
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 76
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 9
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top