Rep. Luna Requests UAP Video, With a List of Names.

[Kyle Ferriter]

David A. Kozik has been doing for this UFO saga since it started in Congress, being present and sitting next to Burlison on ALL Congressional hearings

Can you elaborate? First time I've seen this name.

 

[John J.]

David A. Kozik has been doing for this UFO saga since it started in Congress, being present and sitting next to Burlison on ALL Congressional hearings

Can you elaborate? First time I've seen this name.

David A. Kozik is a/ the (unsure which) Director Congressional Activities, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence.

NewsNation (home of Ross Coulthart) journalist Rob Jones claims Kozik acts as a gatekeeper of UAP- related material, and had a role in denying some politicians (including Eric Burlison) access to a site supposedly linked to UFOs:

According to Jones's research, the alleged gatekeeper is David Kozik, a career Department of Defence civil servant reportedly connected to congressional intelligence coordination. Jones claims that nearly every UFO or UAP-related file heading to Congress has passed through his office.

The claims surfaced as lawmakers investigating UAPs say they were blocked from accessing a facility tied to the UFO issue, raising new concerns about who actually controls disclosure inside the US government.
... ...
Representative Tim Burchett stated in recent remarks that he and other lawmakers, including Eric Burlison, were denied access to a facility connected to the UAP investigation.

Burchett claimed congressional leadership told them the restriction came from the intelligence community itself rather than from Congress.

"Pentagon Gatekeeper's Name Inside the DoD Finally Exposed as Congress Blocked From UFO Facility", International Business Times website,
15 May 2026, Rosemarie Zamora (any relation? ) https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/pentagon-ufo-gatekeeper-washington-debate-1796969

It might be unlikely Burlison and Kozik are associates / confederates, though Kozik probably knows of Burlison, Burlison might know Kozik.

I suspect Kozik is getting attention and criticism from UFO enthusiasts just because of his job, which appears to involve some supervisory/ advisory responsibilities for AARO. He will have other responsibilities under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence, and part of that might include decisions on requests for access to some sensitive sites.
Being an elected politician in many democracies does not confer an automatic right to visit every defence/ intelligence site that they might be interested in.

There is documentary evidence Kozik works as part of a hierarchical chain, as we might expect. He is unlikely to be a sole "gatekeeper" of UAP- related information.

The records also capture friction between Congress and the Pentagon over AARO's responsibilities. During a Senate briefing on drone incursions, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand pressed officials on why the Department lacked a central database for unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions, arguing that AARO should serve that function.

Internal Pentagon correspondence shows immediate pushback. "We do not want to see sUAS added to AARO's portfolio!" Pentagon spokesperson Gough wrote in an email to David A. Kozik, Director Congressional Activities, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence. Kozik repliesd that AARO should serve in a coordinating capacity on counter-UAS issues, but not as the lead office. The discussions underscored a disconnect between congressional expectations and the Department's vision for AARO's scope.

"FOIA Emails Reveal Pentagon's Tight Control Over AARO "Historical Record Report" Rollout and Messaging", The Black Vault website, 27 August 2025, John Greenewald https://www.theblackvault.com/docum...storical-record-report-rollout-and-messaging/

A bit off-topic, but re. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand's proposal, there might be very good reasons why AARO, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, should not have the lead on investigating UAS (uncrewed aerial systems- drones etc..) Drones are known technology, they are not anomalous.
They might be the cause of some reported UAP, but so are airliners. AARO shouldn't take over the FAA's remit.
Various branches of the United States military have decades of experience operating UAS, and developing / using counter-UAS systems. Millions, probably billions of dollars have gone into this. AARO is essentially a modest office-based effort for investigating unusual reports.
Much better-resourced organisations (e.g. NORAD) are responsible for the air defence of the USA and enforcement of air policing.
Making AARO the lead organisation for investigating UAS (possibly including those of less friendly states) doesn't really make much sense in defense/ security terms.

 

[MapperGuy]

David A. Kozik is a/ the (unsure which) Director Congressional Activities, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence.

NewsNation (home of Ross Coulthart) journalist Rob Jones claims Kozik acts as a gatekeeper of UAP- related material, and had a role in denying some politicians (including Eric Burlison) access to a site supposedly linked to UFOs:

According to Jones's research, the alleged gatekeeper is David Kozik, a career Department of Defence civil servant reportedly connected to congressional intelligence coordination. Jones claims that nearly every UFO or UAP-related file heading to Congress has passed through his office.

The claims surfaced as lawmakers investigating UAPs say they were blocked from accessing a facility tied to the UFO issue, raising new concerns about who actually controls disclosure inside the US government.
... ...
Representative Tim Burchett stated in recent remarks that he and other lawmakers, including Eric Burlison, were denied access to a facility connected to the UAP investigation.

Burchett claimed congressional leadership told them the restriction came from the intelligence community itself rather than from Congress.

"Pentagon Gatekeeper's Name Inside the DoD Finally Exposed as Congress Blocked From UFO Facility", International Business Times website,
15 May 2026, Rosemarie Zamora (any relation? ) https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/pentagon-ufo-gatekeeper-washington-debate-1796969

It might be unlikely Burlison and Kozik are associates / confederates, though Kozik probably knows of Burlison, Burlison might know Kozik.

I suspect Kozik is getting attention and criticism from UFO enthusiasts just because of his job, which appears to involve some supervisory/ advisory responsibilities for AARO. He will have other responsibilities under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence, and part of that might include decisions on requests for access to some sensitive sites.
Being an elected politician in many democracies does not confer an automatic right to visit every defence/ intelligence site that they might be interested in.

There is documentary evidence Kozik works as part of a hierarchical chain, as we might expect. He is unlikely to be a sole "gatekeeper" of UAP- related information.

The records also capture friction between Congress and the Pentagon over AARO's responsibilities. During a Senate briefing on drone incursions, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand pressed officials on why the Department lacked a central database for unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions, arguing that AARO should serve that function.
View attachment 90521
Internal Pentagon correspondence shows immediate pushback. "We do not want to see sUAS added to AARO's portfolio!" Pentagon spokesperson Gough wrote in an email to David A. Kozik, Director Congressional Activities, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence. Kozik repliesd that AARO should serve in a coordinating capacity on counter-UAS issues, but not as the lead office. The discussions underscored a disconnect between congressional expectations and the Department's vision for AARO's scope.

"FOIA Emails Reveal Pentagon's Tight Control Over AARO "Historical Record Report" Rollout and Messaging", The Black Vault website, 27 August 2025, John Greenewald https://www.theblackvault.com/docum...storical-record-report-rollout-and-messaging/

A bit off-topic, but re. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand's proposal, there might be very good reasons why AARO, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, should not have the lead on investigating UAS (uncrewed aerial systems- drones etc..) Drones are known technology, they are not anomalous.
They might be the cause of some reported UAP, but so are airliners. AARO shouldn't take over the FAA's remit.
Various branches of the United States military have decades of experience operating UAS, and developing / using counter-UAS systems. Millions, probably billions of dollars have gone into this. AARO is essentially a modest office-based effort for investigating unusual reports.
Much better-resourced organisations (e.g. NORAD) are responsible for the air defence of the USA and enforcement of air policing.
Making AARO the lead organisation for investigating UAS (possibly including those of less friendly states) doesn't really make much sense in defense/ security terms.

Do a search online for "drone pilot license", what pops up?

Federal Aviation Administration website

Drones are under the FAA. And I would bet they have far more people just on the administration of drone pilots licenses than the entire staff of AARO. The FAA does aircraft pilots licenses and drone pilots licenses fit right into that mission, keeping the skies safe from bad pilots.
OF course people trying to kill AARO might try to push things, either shoving AARO into the FAA where it would get swamped or saying if it can't do drones what good is it so disband it.

I don't know what Kozik's job description is but having a single point of contact (POC) for requests from Congress for access to places and info makes a lot of sense. Too many people in Congress have contacts with military people who they might try to leverage for permissions unless there was a designated POC who every request must go through. Although everyone should understand it would not just be him personally as he would have a staff working for him to do the paperwork, ask questions and so forth. Despite what people seem to think there are always staff people involved.

So many times, like with the "missing scientists", people seem to think that high level people work totally alone, with nobody else within their organization knowing a single thing about what they were doing. That is pretty much never the case, there are always people in-the-know around them who are aware of what's going on.

 

[RobertBillyBob]

Looking back at this list it seems like it matches with PR050 to PR099 in order (PR060 to PR063 being one line "11. Spherical UAP Warlock 4X, 4/12/21 (Video 0,1,2)")

 

[RobertBillyBob]

Looking back at this list it seems like it matches with PR050 to PR099 in order (PR060 to PR063 being one line "11. Spherical UAP Warlock 4X, 4/12/21 (Video 0,1,2)")

Luna's list	PR ID	Notes
1. 4 UAP formation – Iran, 8/26/22	PR050
2. Syrian UAP instant acceleration, 2021	PR051
3. UAP USO formation Wiley 2X Zinc	PR052
4. Cigar-shaped or fat spherical UAP, 10/15/22	PR053	"fat" should be "fast"
5. Spherical UAP erratic movement remix (RUST), 2022	PR054
6. Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds, 11/23/20	PR055
7. Spherical UAP pulsing over water Jacker 2X	PR056
8. Spherical UAP in clouds	PR057a
9. Voodoo 4X (Cranberry) UAP	PR058
10. NGA UAP, 6/1/10	PR059
11. Spherical UAP Warlock 4X, 4/12/21 (Video 0,1,2)	PR060 PR061 PR062 PR063​
12. AFSOC Kabul UAP, 2017	PR064
13. USCG C-144 UAP 2 Tic Tac IR hot, 4/24/24	PR065	One of the two should be "UAP 1" instead of both "UAP 2"
14. USCG C-144 UAP 2 Tic Tac IR hot, 4/24/24	PR066
15. Multiple Spherical UAP USO near Sub. Cactus 1X in and out of water, 3/25/22	PR067
16. IIR 1 666 SO151 23 video footage of UAP captured by fifth generation aircraft, 1/20/23	PR068
17. F-18 FLIR UAP	PR069
18. IIR 1 665 SO301 23/Eglin AFB	PR070
19. USAF ANG F-16C (callsign AESIR11) shoots down UAP over Lake Huron with Aim-9X, 2/12/23	PR071
20. Administrative revision: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan – UAP in vicinity of Karaganda International Airport	PR072
21. IIR 1 655 S0053 23/ Several UAP in vicinity of Columbus OH airport	PR073
22. MQ-9 observer UAP in East China Sea, 1/5/23	PR057b	(same as 57a)
23. Assault 1X (steel) HD_20220613, 6/13/22	PR074
24. EP-3 Observed UAP in the ECS, 6/9/21	PR075
25. Lightning (Lavendar) observes UAP, 1/3/21	PR076
26. Hackney 6 (Toxic 6) observes and tracks UAP, 11/2/20 (video 1,2)	PR077 PR078
27. Toxic 6 (Mercury) observes 3 fast moving UAPs, 10/29/20	PR079
28. Toxic 6 (Hackney 6) observes UAPs, 10/20/20	PR080
29. Greed observes UAP, 10/18/20	PR081
30. Greed observes UAP, 10/16/20	PR082
31. Mad Dog 31 observes UAP, 10/17/20	PR083?	error in both dates, 17 SEP and 7 OCT not 17 OCT
32. Regulator 73 observes UAP, 10/17/20	PR084?
33. Toxic 6 (Hackney 6) observes UAP, 9/16/20	PR085
34. UAP on East Coast, 12/1/19	PR086
35. Toxic 6 UAP, 9/5/20	PR087
36. Toxic 6 (Hackney6) observes UAP, 8/31/20 (video 1,2)	PR088 PR089
37. Hellhound 1X (Coffee) observes UAP, 8/24/20	PR090
38. Toxic 6 observes UAP in Persian Gulf, 8/21/20	PR091
39. Hackney 6 (Toxic 6) UAP observation, 8/8/20	PR092
40. Hackney 6 (MQ-9) Gulf of Arabia dual UAP, 5/5/20	PR093
41. Hackney 5X (mint) HD 2020-02-13, 2/13/20	PR094
42. Hackney 6 (MQ-9) UAP in Persian Gulf, 5/20/20	PR095?	error in date? 5/5/20?
43. HH-11 UAPs, 7/3/18	PR096
44. Hi-Res: Hackney 4X observes UAP at 2135Z, 9/25/19	PR097
45. UFOs in formation over Persian Gulf	PR098
46. Hi-Res: Hackney 4X observes UAPs at 1715Z, 9/23/19	PR099