Oystein
Senior Member
That was a very verbous and convoluted "NO" to my question, which was whether or not Hulsey's conclusion follows validly from his study as it stands today. It bugs me why you couldn't simply answer with a simple, straight and honest "No"?Best guess there is that it probably is not that easy to get a building like WTC7 to collapse in the manner it did. ... I don't think that the project has yet proven that fire didn't do it.
By agreeing that Hulsey's conclusion is INVALID . Thank you.In what way do you believe to have "debunked" Dr Hulsey ?
And this is the other HUGE problem we have with this study:...
The progression model has not been released by UAF...
In this respect Dr Hulsey and his team will be more in the know than we are, ...
It was promised in 2015, when MONEY was solicited, that the public would be kept updated throughout the entire duration of the project, and that all data would be made public, such that you, I, everybody can transparently follow the progress.
This promise has been broken. Agreed?
How do you, personally, feel about Hulsey keeping us in the dark for two years and STILL not making his study transparent - contrary to the promises?