Debunked: "The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media"

Status
Not open for further replies.
ALL TV IS PROPAGANDA AND IS CONTROLLED.

This is a disinfo blog.

X2

"ASK ABOUT ILLUMINATI THUG BOYS" in 1980's "Duck Tales" cartoon.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=83e_1343674397&comments=1

"clearly some of the people who were forced to create these propaganda shows for the masses were unhappy about the situation and tried to warn others about the masonic luciferian new world order that controls the media

look at ducktails, it was a very anti capitalist, anti american cartoon which depicted wealthy people as negative characters"

[Usually a comment on a rare piece of the puzzle such as this, will usually reveal some pertinent well researched facts - as everyone I know who has the courage to look at the truth will all come to the same conclusions in time, if they care to]

Proof Chemtrails are being edited into old moves, commercials, cartoons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrlwFo-_P1c

What don't believe the "government" would be "evil" enough to do such a thing as edit big fat Chemtrails in childrens cartoons to train them....????

Then that is probably because you don't believe the government would commit and coverup such a thing as Chemtrails do you now?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGm5URFuj_c


The only Conspiracy with a big honkin smoking gun is 9/11, and most people can't see it, or try to argue it until peoples heads hurt, focusing on the little things. The 3 towers that collapsed on 9/11 all defied the laws of thermo-dynamics... The fires were almost out, and several researchers have confirmed perfectly round sphere's of nano-thermite, that could have only been formed under those conditions.

1 Hour: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
2 Hour: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7JCqlF24pI


"Wake Up Sheeple"
http://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/deesclear2_dees.jpg?w=640

Of course Mick here agrees there is stuff wrong with the world... He's disinfo... I hate posting here. This is the mental institute for those who can't handle what they've looked into, what they caught a glimpse of.

Like all these shootings, to de-arm the population.

Sandy Hook & Aurora
Both In Dark Knight Rises -
What Are The Odds?
http://rense.com/general95/sandyaurora.html

and The Satanic Olympics
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/0...emony-photos-the-msm-doesnt-want-to-show-you/


The Tears Of Obama, Sandy Hook And GO SH at the Olympics
http://merovee.wordpress.com/2012/12/15/gosh/
{Proof Chemtrails are being edited into old moves, commercials, cartoons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrlwFo-_P1c } Completely different scenes . Guess they added a tree too ? Look like different actors too ? You gotta do better then this to prove a point .
 
I don't think anyone neutral who has ever seen Fox News is in any doubt that it's biased. There's obvious SOME corporate (and individual) influence of the media. The question is how much, and who, and what does the CIA do with domestic media.

You give a lot of examples. Can you pick the one that you think has the strongest evidence? Preferable a CIA related one.
Same with MSNBC CNN ABC CBS NBC State Run Media .
 
I never knew that selling something to someone, made them 'my buddy'.
Why else would you sell to them ? When you had another offer from a American to buy Current TV ? Oilman Al Gorlioni Loves Money
 
I don't think anyone neutral who has ever seen Fox News is in any doubt that it's biased. There's obvious SOME corporate (and individual) influence of the media. The question is how much, and who, and what does the CIA do with domestic media.

You give a lot of examples. Can you pick the one that you think has the strongest evidence? Preferable a CIA related one.

EX-CIA- John Stockwell makes it make sense in this video - this is a good story:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8pve_CGjME

1/3 of his command force were professional propagandists that wrote stories at pushed them into newspapers.

Notice how the news will attribute stories to "someone else reporting" therefore they have plausible deniability.

So Fox says Reuters is reporting "whatever" - and then pundits come on with VIGOR and discuss some totally framed version of the "debate". At that point the audience thinks it's real. (Reuters and AP are owned by the Rothschilds, fyi)

This report says the CIA has now outsourced to many private companies:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/06/AR2007070601993.html

I think it would be extremely difficult to know who is CIA these days. And who are they truly working for?
 
Well, If I had an offer of the same amount of money from LYING, hatemongering Glenn Beck, and Al Jazeera, I think I would prefer Al Jazeera also. Much of their science reporting stinks, but they do have a political viewpoint that is not already all over US airwaves. Glenn Beck is so far to the right that even Fox News had to dump him.

I see nothing out there that says that Glenn Beck had the 500 million dollars it sold for. Also, Al Gore did not own it, he only owned 20 % of it---If the other owners had preferred to sell to Beck or aliens from Vulcan, Gore wouldn't have been able to stop them.

That is the problem, when folks research things, they learn the facts.
 
Well, If I had an offer of the same amount of money from LYING, hatemongering Glenn Beck, and Al Jazeera, I think I would prefer Al Jazeera also. Much of their science reporting stinks, but they do have a political viewpoint that is not already all over US airwaves. Glenn Beck is so far to the right that even Fox News had to dump him.

I see nothing out there that says that Glenn Beck had the 500 million dollars it sold for. Also, Al Gore did not own it, he only owned 20 % of it---If the other owners had preferred to sell to Beck or aliens from Vulcan, Gore wouldn't have been able to stop them.

That is the problem, when folks research things, they learn the facts.
List The Lies ? List the hate ? he has a bigger audience on Dish tv and the internet then anyone on CNN MSNBC . You dont watch it so you dont know . Other suitors who didn't share Current's ideology were rebuffed. Glenn Beck's The Blaze approached Current about buying the channel last year, but was told that "the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view," according to a person familiar with the negotiations.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/03/glenn-beck-purchase-current-tv-report_n_2402273.html
 
So what? That still doesn't mean he had or didn't have the money. 500 million is a LOT of money. Do you think they should have been MADE sell it to the first inquiry ? or to anyone they didn't approve of?

Lets say that Catholic church decides to sell a small hospital, and say Planned Parenthood has the funding they approach them to buy it. Do you feel that they should have to sell it to them?
 
List The Lies ? List the hate ? he has a bigger audience on Dish tv and the internet then anyone on CNN MSNBC . You dont watch it so you dont know . Other suitors who didn't share Current's ideology were rebuffed. Glenn Beck's The Blaze approached Current about buying the channel last year, but was told that "the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view," according to a person familiar with the negotiations.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/03/glenn-beck-purchase-current-tv-report_n_2402273.html

Lies and truths of Glenn Beck from Politifact.
 
So what? That still doesn't mean he had or didn't have the money. 500 million is a LOT of money. Do you think they should have been MADE sell it to the first inquiry ? or to anyone they didn't approve of?

Lets say that Catholic church decides to sell a small hospital, and say Planned Parenthood has the funding they approach them to buy it. Do you feel that they should have to sell it to them?
just like Al Gore Id say its hypocritical
 
EX-CIA- John Stockwell makes it make sense in this video - this is a good story:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8pve_CGjME
I think it would be extremely difficult to know who is CIA these days. And who are they truly working for?

So - CIA was impacting Angola a few years ago. It's Syria today:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_orfcGnaseE

Afghanistan poppy production has skyrocketed under US occupation. It's twisted by news into "pacifying the locals". When does the US ever pacify locals by allowing illegal activity? The CIA's been running drugs since Vietnam and everyone knows it. Now they're running opium.

Real news isn't reported in detail and depth. But Sandy Hook sensations are.

Why isn't the horrifying NDAA law on TV all day long every day. That's VERY SERIOUS news.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsGJpTAsV8k

250,000 people are going to die from taking their prescription drugs PROPERLY this year. Those number dwarf the gun death numbers. Seems like real news.

What about the link between MMR vaccinations and Autism? That's REAL news.
http://www.nyrnaturalnews.com/chemi...n-court-rules-mmr-vaccine-did-trigger-autism/

That's really where the bias is in the media. It's not left wing or right wing. Truly, if you're still caught up in the left vs. right paradigm you are perfectly controlled. Compare what politicians SAY vs. what they PASS into law. Both sides lie constantly. Those lies are LEGAL but immoral.

So why does anyone keep voting for either of these parties?

And does your vote even matter anymore?

I assume you've seen this Vote Machine programmer's testimony before Congress about how elections WERE rigged. No?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbf3iaEbAuY

"She said - You don't understand, we need to HIDE the fraud in the source code because we need to control the vote in South Florida."

People in Ohio went to jail for rigging elections for Bush. Seems like rigged elections would be news... but strangely it's conspiracy theory. Why?

(Glen Beck: I know a guy who was doing business with Beck and his impression was Beck would say anything for a buck and didn't trust him. I think Beck covered the Federal Reserve accurately and that direction of thought may have gotten his ass fired. Advertisers were bailing on his show- which shows once again who really runs the media. The advertisers.)

Keith Olbermann, Judge Napolitano, Lew Rockwell, Donahue, Glen Beck... kinda independent voices from both sides. All kinda fired. Do I really need to connect every dot?

Ok. Here's how to lose your job in talk radio:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-to-lose-your-job-in-talk-radio/
 
Why else would you sell to them ? When you had another offer from a American to buy Current TV ? Oilman Al Gorlioni Loves Money

Maybe because Al J was the highest bidder?

On the other hand, Al J wouldn't have had to be the highest bidder to have their offer accepted. There are two parts to any offer: Price and Terms. If someone offered you 500,000 for your house and was putting down 3% and applying for a mortgage, another offer of 480,000 all cash, close next week would be the better offer, the one you SHOULD accept. All Gore did was sell to the bird in his hand rather than the two in the bush.

Besides, if they're Al Gore's buddies, wouldn't he have GIVEN it to them for $1, or far below fair market value? Or why not just give them a show, or allow them to influence the programming for money? Why are they his buddies? Cause he's a leftie? You can't just throw an accusation out there. Back it up for a change.
 
Keith Olbermann, Judge Napolitano, Lew Rockwell, Donahue, Glen Beck... kinda independent voices from both sides. All kinda fired. Do I really need to connect every dot?

Each dot goes from one talking head to another who was either past his prime. . . BORING. . . or too bat poop nuts for mainstream.



Ok. Here's how to lose your job in talk radio:
http://www.theamericanconservative.c...in-talk-radio/

NEver heard of him. Big loss.
 
This TED Talk about the change in food engineering directly relates to the Monsanto Bovine Growth Hormone story that FOX killed in the 90s.

In the mid 90s our food changed. If you have kids you must watch. Seems like news to me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWXrRftyOMY
 
I was searching for information on Operation Mockingbird and happened to see a link to this site.

All I needed to know about this site was revealed very quickly when I saw these clowns use "Snopes.com" as an "authority".

Ha ha ha ha.....A web site boasting TWO employees. A middle aged Jewish couple with zero background or credibility, backed by the George Soros funded Open Society Foundation. These clowns are well known leftist/establishment shills. What a JOKE.

Gotta love you guys for making it sooo easy to debunk YOU !!!!!!!! Ha ha ha ha .....
 
I was searching for information on Operation Mockingbird and happened to see a link to this site.

All I needed to know about this site was revealed very quickly when I saw these clowns use "Snopes.com" as an "authority".

Ha ha ha ha.....A web site boasting TWO employees. A middle aged Jewish couple with zero background or credibility, backed by the George Soros funded Open Society Foundation. These clowns are well known leftist/establishment shills. What a JOKE.

Gotta love you guys for making it sooo easy to debunk YOU !!!!!!!! Ha ha ha ha .....

I don't know when Snopes lost its credibility among certain people. Maybe when it started debunking their beliefs? I find it interesting that the Mikkelsons aren't to be taken seriously because they have "zero background", what kind of background do most CTers have? Chemtrail believers whom the closest they've come to aviation is flying as a passenger on a plane? Their closest contact with forensics is watching CSI?

Can you prove they're backed by George Soros?

http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp
 
I don't know when Snopes lost its credibility among certain people. Maybe when it started debunking their beliefs? I find it interesting that the Mikkelsons aren't to be taken seriously because they have "zero background", what kind of background do most CTers have? Chemtrail believers whom the closest they've come to aviation is flying as a passenger on a plane? Their closest contact with forensics is watching CSI?

Can you prove they're backed by George Soros?

http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

Maybe they lost their credibility because they are Jewish?
 
two words "FOX NEWS" Who needs to pay a news agency it is much more valuable to be owed a favor by the CIA.
It gives you reign to pretty much do or say anything, without having to worry about accountability.
 
Huh!!!

Please explain your comment and offer evidence that Fox is 'owed' a favor by the CIA. (and I don't watch or like FOX news, but I don't want misinformation about them circulating either).
 
The CIA controls media. 6 corporations own all major media in north america, Mark is either ignorant or a shill. check out this video where they admit to it under hearings. http://youtu.be/BZWJNUHOGhU
 
I don't see them saying that they 'own' all the major media. I hear them admitting that they did pay SOME folks to post stories for them. That is a LONG way from OWNING or controlling the media.

Not only that, that was from 1975, Much of today's media didn't even exist then.

I would appreciate it if you took the time to read the politeness policy.
 
One has to love a good CTist. Instead of rational arguments one gets half formed points with no evidence and the explanation that it is obvious. If it was so obvious we would not need evidence and the evidence should be easy to find. Reminds me of grading freshman papers.

And yeah I was married to a Jew for 5 years. Maybe it was the conversion thing or being poor but she received no newsletter nor any coded info. Maybe I was not around long enough to gain access to this fabled wealth and influence.
 
Jewish couple

the fuck does that matter?


im going to develop a knee jerk reaction to slap anyone who uses the word shill in real life because of this website... ive never once heard the word used by someone who wasnt talking out their ass. not once.

the amount of consistent jewish hate in CT is hilarious and disturbing. i spent a lot of time fighting with the crackpots at 'eyes wide open news' on fb but finally blocked them after i couldnt take the odd influx of projihad pseudo-islam members they were getting in addition to their mindless ct pushers just because of their constant jew bashing/anti-'zionism'.

dont get me wrong, holding any religious belief looses major credibility points in my book, but how many things can you scapegoat on to one people? a people who as a whole are pretty disconnected from their religion anyway...



and debunking/fact checking is a semantic method, one need not be familiar with every subject to make a valid judgement on its bullshit level.
 
Shill is a word, like 'sheeple' that folks use when they can't counter the facts you post. It is a 'kill the messenger' comment.

If a major company donates money to an University, then EVERY piece of research that university does is 'clouded' by that. At the same time if an activist group pays for a study, then that study is infallible. HUH? To be honest one needs to apply the same conditions to each side. Try saying that and you are immediately branded a corporate shill.

I think so far I have been accused of being a shill for BP, big oil, Haliburton, big Pharma, the Jewish controlled news media and for the government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top