john.phil
Senior Member.
~104m is the altitude in respect to the take off point. The altitude in respect to mean sea level was ~155m.I dont understand what kind of lens they could be using to have their altitude read as 104 meters
~104m is the altitude in respect to the take off point. The altitude in respect to mean sea level was ~155m.I dont understand what kind of lens they could be using to have their altitude read as 104 meters
ah. thanks!. i still cant get the borders to line up at that low a height. The lens must be "distorting" the view somehow...The altitude in respect to mean sea level was ~155m.
This is footage taken from a mobile phone recording close to the screen at an angle, thus some adjustments are expected.The lens must be "distorting" the view somehow...
In the first frames, the zoom scale is visible. By measuring the relative position of the zoom gauge and comparing to the same drone model display, it was wide open at 1.0x.i dont know how much zoom was being employed at start of video
Not necessarily warm - but highly reflective.Exactly what I was writing right now:
Anybody noticed the big solar farm in the near vicinity of the greenhouses? The panels might be warm and from the drone's perspective look like a flat blop.
I think you're right here. They appear to be oriented to the south, which is what you'd expect for solar panels in the northern hemisphere.The panels are tilted away from the drone, probably about 40° facing South. The drone camera doesn't really see the reflective side.
the display doesnt line up with the drone imagery even if i transform a tad to compensate from the phone angle. (it helps) i think their display HUD is broken.The other thing that could cause a reflection are these two large solar farms. Not sure how that lines up with the drone imagery though.
compromise and pick the greenhouses in the middleHowever, the bigger issue is that the solar farm is on a bearing of about 160° compared to the 127° that the UFO on in the drone video.
Or his hill that would stick its head above a low fog....compromise and pick the greenhouses in the middle
Please, try the position towards the right, where it was originally proposed, because at the position on the left, there is a road missing from the footage (yellow arrow), so it's probably not the right spot:the display doesnt line up with the drone imagery even if i transform a tad to compensate from the phone angle. (it helps) i think their display HUD is broken.
with my placement literally everything else matches up -minus the iphone slight distort (the river land bump, the field edge, the left corner with the long building etc. if i go right i lose all those line ups.Please, try the position towards the right, where it was originally proposed, because at the position on the left, there is a road missing from the footage (yellow arrow), so it's probably not the right spot:
@Mick West possible solution here?I'm kicking myself for not having a camera with a real-ish zoom ready all the time.
Last night as the "big storm" fizzled around here, I looked out and saw the Ukrainian UFO in the distance. There was lots of clouds and mist, but in the middle of it was a long thin rectangular UFO, almost exactly like the one in the video, just inverted. Not being a black hot thermal image, the UFO was very bright compared to the surroundings. After watching for a few minutes, I tried to video it with my phone, but it was just too far away. I went for a camera with a zoom, but as it rarely gets used anymore the battery was dead.
My plan was to shoot a photo or video and then make it B&W and invert it. I really think it would have looked pretty close for being 1/2 way around the world.
Trust me bro, I know what I saw!
This morning, I did some more looking and I'm pretty sure what I saw was the setting sun hitting a building of some sort just right to make it shine/reflect through the mist and clouds. These buildings appear to be around 35 miles away:
View attachment 66475
With the main suspect being the Johns Manville insulation factory that kinda sits by itself in a sea of ag land:
View attachment 66476
There is also a variety of ag buildings in the area.
No luck tonight with the same effect, but I've now got some morning photos of the area with a proper camera. Hopefully the scene will repeat, though it was very possible that like many UFO photos, it was the result of the clouds, sun, view and other things being just right for just a few minutes.
The Ukrainian operator claims the footage was taken at 9pm a couple of weeks ago, which excludes a reflection from the Sun. Also, the object would appear quite hot under IR if the Sun was reflecting from it.possible solution here?
source?The Ukrainian operator claims the footage was taken at 9pm a week ago, which excludes a reflection from the Sun. Also, the object would appear quite hot under IR if the Sun was reflecting from it.
Post #9:source?
searching... a new article came up 5 minutes ago
Article: 'I use this [infrared, heat vision] filter very often,' the unit drone operator said, 'and just got experience so I can differentiate how bright an object should be according to what temperature.'
Based on that experience, Vadym stated that the UFO was 'was very hot. I'm guessing 20 to 30 degrees [Celsius] hotter than other objects.'
Vadym estimated that the roughly 1,300 ft (400 meters) long UFO was also about 328 feet (100 meters) tall.
It caught on the camera of a commercial DJI brand thermal-imaging drone on February 23, 2024.
The possible craft, spotted around 9:02pm local time, appeared to be approximately 37 to 40 miles away from the soldiers, he said, towards Donetsk Oblast, the southeastern Ukrainian province that has been most dominated by Russia's forces. Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13142223/ukrainian-soldier-ufo-donetsk-sighting.html
I will have to give credit to the New York Post's Basement Office dude. After being caught up in the hype like a typical tabloid, he calmed a bit and decided to dig into the backstory.If nothing else, I'm enjoying the discussion on Reddit that the Daily Mail is tabloid trash -- except for their (credulous) UFO coverage, which for some reason is rock-solid.
@Mick West possible solution here?