I'm collecting here some related sources. The relevant part of her Quora post:
The statement by Michelle Detras is rather odd, I think.
Consider,
External Quote:
On Friday, February 6th my father died... His name was Michael Howard Rogers. He was best known for his role as the crew captain in the movie Fire In The Sky.
But the real Michael Rogers didn't have a "role as the crew captain in the movie Fire In The Sky", the role of the crew captain in the movie
Fire In The Sky (listed as Mike Rogers) was played by Robert Patrick (Wikipedia
Fire in the Sky https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_in_the_Sky, also IMDB
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106912/?ref_=fn_t_1)
Maybe I'm being overly pedantic, but I feel this is odd phrasing. Surely his
actual part in whatever took place- and (allegedly) the fact that he lied to his family for decades- would be more important to her than his portrayal in a movie. Sure, maybe mention the film, but still.
There's this,
External Quote:
...he was terrified of going to jail or prison- most specifically for the Phoenix Lights hoax- because the military got involved to investigate what was definitely seen as a potential threat to millions of people
(my emphasis) which seems, perhaps paradoxically, to chime with the Ufology belief that the military take UFOs desperately seriously as possible- if not probable or proven- alien spacecraft.
I doubt that there's any documentary evidence that anyone in a relevant position of authority ever raised the possibility of millions of people being threatened by the Phoenix lights.
Then the claims of additional hoaxes:
It also contains dumb stuff like this...
External Quote:
One of his last hoaxes includes what is known as the Phoenix Lights... He said that he did not intend to fly his UFO over the enormous city of Phoenix...
Oh, brother...
I think we can be
fairly confident about the probable causes of the "Phoenix lights". I agree with Z.W. Wolf's sentiments.
Unlikely coincidences do occur, but like
@NorCal Dave (
post #8) I'm not sure I buy that Mr. Rogers happened to "fly a UFO" at the roughly the same time and location as a likely known cause for (at least the main part of) the observed lights.
And
External Quote:
This includes several crop circles in England beginning with an intricate snowflake design in 1994.
Transatlantic flights aren't that expensive, but lots of crop circles (many hundreds, perhaps thousands) were made from the end of the 70s to the early 2000s in England, about half of them in Wiltshire and neighbouring Hampshire (they continue to a lesser extent).
Why go to the expense of flying over just to add a few more? Why not do it in the States?
Almost all scientific, and most journalistic, curiosity about crop circle's origins largely evaporated around 1991/ 1992, when it was demonstrated that designs as complex as any claimed to be from "real" crop circles could be made by very few people using very simple, very cheap tools, and that those who claimed that authentic circles had unreproducible physical characteristics couldn't in fact tell known hoax circles from circles of unknown origin that they believed to be "real" (brief notes about this in
post #123, "Are All UFO Reports Wrong, Or Are They Evidence That UFOs Exist?" thread, see also Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_circle).
Maybe a crop circle in 1994 would be entertaining for the numerous summer campers who used to congregate at Honeystreet and other Wiltshire locations for the purpose of finding crop circles (maybe they still do), but post 1992 or thereabouts it wouldn't get much attention outside of woo enthusiasts (and others who just enjoyed the designs).
This is from the current website of The Barge Inn, Honeystreet, "Local Attractions"
https://thebargeinnhoneystreet.uk/local-attractions/