The Telepathy Tapes

[FatPhil]

The fact that the receiver is part of the test team should rule out most cheating methods.

That said, what I would want to see is a control experiment with a non-telepath in the sender position, and the same receiver.

Nah, I want to be the reciever, and I want my share of the $500000!

EDIT: Also, I don't think a tester should be the receiver - because that invites claims of deliberate bias.

 

[JMartJr]

The fact that the receiver is part of the test team should rule out most cheating methods.

Can you expound? I'm not sure I follow.


Also, more generally and not in response to Mendel's post, it is worth keeping in mind that there is deliberate cheating, and there is also not knowing that you are getting the information through other channels, such as hearing what the sound of the numeral being drown is and inferring the number subconsciously. Not all ways to get a false positive result involve deliberate falsification.

 

[Ann K]

I think non-reporting is a receiver's most honest way of saying "I'm getting nothing". Forcing the person into making a guess changes the whole business from telepathy into mere statistics. If you want to test telepathy, the receiver would have to sense something, but if you're just testing statistics you would need a much greater number of tests.

 

[Giddierone]

I think non-reporting is a receiver's most honest way of saying "I'm getting nothing". Forcing the person into making a guess changes the whole business from telepathy into mere statistics. If you want to test telepathy, the receiver would have to sense something, but if you're just testing statistics you would need a much greater number of tests.

I agree. But, how does she explain the rounds where she did write a number then? Did she "get" something? If so how?

The whole thing just seems like they pulled it together on their lunch break. Why couldn't they have grabbed a random stranger off the street to be the reciever and/or not tell them what the test is about.