Toadyuk
New Member
I have a declared interest in the individual called Travis Taylor who is presented as a credible scientist with a PhD on the history channel. They call him make a scientist, team leader and also a reliable person who can interpret and inform the public about the strange events seeming to occur on the ranch.
I feel that his pronouncements, observations and descriptions are unscientific at best and often misleading and potentially ill informed or worse. He makes statements that are unfounded and fails to present any consistent evidence to back these up. Due to thread rules I will focus on a specific example and show how I think it is flawed.
I think that he tends to quickly reach for paranormal, abnormal or pseudoscience explanations without using any scientific thinking, critical thinking or logic as my example will show below.
Because he is a TV "scientist" and makes such bold claims - he is now a rising star and "poster boy" for the UFO and woo fields. I am keen to provide good and reasoned evidence to help inform anyone seeking to debate him.
My hope is that I can with others document via series of threads some good counter arguments to his pronouncements, which someone on YouTube or in an interview can put to him directly to see his response. I wish to avoid mudslinging, so have picked my words carefully and focus on facts and evidence with pictures.
I feel that his pronouncements, observations and descriptions are unscientific at best and often misleading and potentially ill informed or worse. He makes statements that are unfounded and fails to present any consistent evidence to back these up. Due to thread rules I will focus on a specific example and show how I think it is flawed.
I think that he tends to quickly reach for paranormal, abnormal or pseudoscience explanations without using any scientific thinking, critical thinking or logic as my example will show below.
Because he is a TV "scientist" and makes such bold claims - he is now a rising star and "poster boy" for the UFO and woo fields. I am keen to provide good and reasoned evidence to help inform anyone seeking to debate him.
My hope is that I can with others document via series of threads some good counter arguments to his pronouncements, which someone on YouTube or in an interview can put to him directly to see his response. I wish to avoid mudslinging, so have picked my words carefully and focus on facts and evidence with pictures.
So here goes;
the episode clip is on youtube and just a few mins, can be seen here;
Source: https://youtu.be/nDjQEbjwqLo
Summary;
the team are on the porch of ranch 1 and note some cattle stampeding. They go to investigate and stand looking at the cattle. They say they have never seen the cattle act like this before. They then notice a localised magnetic anomaly that has inverted north and south within their locality. This is shown on an iPhone compass as well as a traditional compass. Travis Taylor explains that this is unprecedented, cannot be explained by him, he has no natural explanation for this and feels it is linked to the mystery that is skinwalker ranch.
Spoiler;
I have an explanation, it's very simple. You should never take a compass reading beside or near to a long linear iron object, be that a fence or wires. This is basic physics and taught to every person who ever uses a compass. It should certainly be known to a scientist and even if for some reason this isn't known, the application of the scientific method should be to seek common explanations and ten mins of critical thinking would reveal the answer.
here the team notices the stampede
then they walk to the fence
travis then takes his readings and informs everyone that "due West is due North right now"
we then see this "evidence" on his iphone
we then see Dragon take the same reading
with the same result on his analog "old skool" compass
Comments;
it should be obvious to anyone reading this that the explanation is obvious, however if we wish to try and give Travis the benefit of the doubt should he not have at least tried to replicate the tests in the localised area !
he should have taken readings every 1m or so in various directions and when that showed the inversion tailing off as they move away from the fence, he would then have understood the results.
he also should have taken readings the next day and again, he would have seen the supposed anomaly always present at that location, at which point any scientist would start to generate conjectures as to why this should be. Of course any scientist with even basic training would quickly if not immediately identify the fact that a very large ferrous object is located next to the anomaly and may actually be the cause ?
I feel that I am being somewhat lenient in the above, to someone who professes that they are a scientist. I would dearly like to see someone put the above argument to Travis and see his response.
Why did he decide on TV to clearly make bold statements about two point observations made in the field and from those two samples postulate the fact that:
1. He has no scientific or natural explanation
2. That weird anomalies are occurring on the ranch
3. That whatever is occurring is all linked
I don't mind people having all sorts of views, opinions and ideas - but I do mind those who claim it is science when it bears no resemblance to the method.
Last edited by a moderator: