Optical illusions

[NoParty]

Let's have someone (with better Photoshopping or AI skills than I), do a similar one,
but using fraudster Charles Ponzi instead of a car: A Ponzi Ponzo!

 

[John J.]

A Ponzi Ponzo!

(I didn't quote the first part of the sentence, not claiming to have any Photoshopping or AI skills )

 

[Trailblazer]

Yeah, I guess so. I'm not articulating my feelings about the picture very well. It illustrates the Ponzi illusion, but as a facsimile of a real-world scene it isn't believable (although not physically impossible- different scale models of an otherwise visually identical car could be made).

But as @Mendel says, it shows how unreliable estimates of size are when we are dealing with objects at unknown distances. It also (to me at least) clearly shows that the cause of the "Moon illusion" is simply the Ponzo illusion and not any of the other outlandish explanations that have been advanced over the years.

 

[FatPhil]

But as @Mendel says, it shows how unreliable estimates of size are when we are dealing with objects at unknown distances. It also (to me at least) clearly shows that the cause of the "Moon illusion" is simply the Ponzo illusion and not any of the other outlandish explanations that have been advanced over the years.

So you're saying "the object lower in field of view seems smaller relative to a flat surface" is an explanation for an object appearing larger when lower in the field of view and viewed across a nearly flat surface?