(I didn't quote the first part of the sentence, not claiming to have any Photoshopping or AI skillsA Ponzi Ponzo!
But as @Mendel says, it shows how unreliable estimates of size are when we are dealing with objects at unknown distances. It also (to me at least) clearly shows that the cause of the "Moon illusion" is simply the Ponzo illusion and not any of the other outlandish explanations that have been advanced over the years.Yeah, I guess so. I'm not articulating my feelings about the picture very well. It illustrates the Ponzi illusion, but as a facsimile of a real-world scene it isn't believable (although not physically impossible- different scale models of an otherwise visually identical car could be made).
But as @Mendel says, it shows how unreliable estimates of size are when we are dealing with objects at unknown distances. It also (to me at least) clearly shows that the cause of the "Moon illusion" is simply the Ponzo illusion and not any of the other outlandish explanations that have been advanced over the years.
No, I was saying "Our brains see objects as being larger when they appear to be at a distance in a 3D scene".So you're saying "the object lower in field of view seems smaller relative to a flat surface" is an explanation for an object appearing larger when lower in the field of view and viewed across a nearly flat surface?
Unfortunately for my theory, the illusion doesn't really seem to work in a picture.