if it has nothing to do with chemtrails, she needs to stop calling herself a whistle blower in the context of a talk about chemtrails... even if she isnt saying it about chemtrails, it is being used to mislead people far far more susceptible than us. if its irrelevant like her job/army experience, as well as seemingly her vague, internet bought diploma(perhaps, no confirmation on the source of that, however her lack of understanding of simple sciences would tend to agree), she needs to stop touting them around.
remove all that, and she is just another regular person who has jumped the gun and made up her mind before she understands what she is getting into like so many thousands before her.
but include that, and she is a seemingly credible powerhouse for converting people, her 'credentials' making them even less likely to research before they decide to believe bad science/hoax/religion... and once a person who lacks an understand of the scientific method has made up their mind, data and true research has no place in the debate any longer...
if she doesn't stop, take a cool, level headed approach to what is contrail science from square one, demand a take down of videos with her in it, and cancel any authorization to use her likeness in that movie, she will get burnt in the end. not by us, the people she thinks are trying to hurt her, but by the people she has allied herself along side.
When an misguided/out of touch person hears ex army+chemtrails they think irrefutable proof from an insider, but her army work has no connection.
When an misguided/out of touch person hears science degree+chemtrails they think its okay to not look into the data and just take her opinion. She clearly is not an authority in the area or even well versed in it on an amateur level. she clearly has little non job related science knowledge and a basic misunderstanding of contrails and chemistry.
When an misguided/out of touch person hears whistle blower+chemtrails they will automatically assume they are connected, no matter how many times you say otherwise, after the fact.
When an misguided/out of touch person hears someone has proof, but not now, they assume it is true and rarely check back to see if it ever was.
This is irresponsible, and i wish she would not have gone off after having simply been challenged on the points she put out for public debate...
Perhaps we come off quickly/sharp, after all, Jay did write the book on how to run this hoax and he has taken apart people with far more experience and devious belief systems than hers. It is also something we all do for fun/out of compulsion in our spare time... its a subject we are well familiar with, and her own omissions and refusal to provide data are what brought up any and all personal inquiries/challenges.
We are normal people... some are engineers, some fly planes, a journalist, meteorologist but then many of use have no vested interest in this at all. take notice that Mick has no ads and sells no products unlike the people on the other side of this debate. he is making no money from this. perhaps he is loosing some. im not sure. I myself was a child prodigy, a scientific jack of all trades who upon reaching my mid teens backed out, pulled the academic plug, and fubared my life. I went to culinary school and now work as a chef... i clearly make no money from this debate. i just ask you please take that into consideration. We are not the ones manipulating the situation here.
