Spilling over from
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ho...e-denier-and-then-what.1255/page-7#post-58198
If for arguments sake, we accept that CO2 content of the atmosphere needs to come down, or at least not climb appreciably further, that will defacto amount to Geoengineering. In fact, it must be accepted that as a player in the field we have already impacted the atmosphere/climate simply by our presence and activities, that in essence makes us guilty of geoengineering anyway, even if it was unintentional.
So how do we actually go about stabilising the CO2 or if we choose, even reversing it?
Bearing in mind that 'we', the developed world are the main culprits in this, what sacrifices and changes are needed. What exactly are the economic ramifications?
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ho...e-denier-and-then-what.1255/page-7#post-58198
If for arguments sake, we accept that CO2 content of the atmosphere needs to come down, or at least not climb appreciably further, that will defacto amount to Geoengineering. In fact, it must be accepted that as a player in the field we have already impacted the atmosphere/climate simply by our presence and activities, that in essence makes us guilty of geoengineering anyway, even if it was unintentional.
So how do we actually go about stabilising the CO2 or if we choose, even reversing it?
Bearing in mind that 'we', the developed world are the main culprits in this, what sacrifices and changes are needed. What exactly are the economic ramifications?
Last edited by a moderator: