Earth's Curve Calculator

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
They are all close (depending on what you are viewing, distance and size). The closer they are, the less accurate it is. The problem is, it's quite complicated, so you can't really give a simple explanation.

Where's the debate?
 

Jesse3959

Member
The above point is being discussed right now on a YouTube panel debate. From listening to them, it seems that it would really benefit to define "close" more specifically. One person thinks "close" means six inches but not six feet; another thinks six feet is "close". And there may be others who think twenty feet is "close".

How close is "too close" depends on how thick the increased density gradient is above the water, and how much of your line of sight goes through the region of increased density gradient.

For example, in my location, at least during the cooler months, standard refraction seems to nearly always hold true. In one case I measured the dip of the horizon with a theodolite from 56 feet up - and I measured 0.124 degrees - which very close to the standard atmospheric refraction globe model figure of 0.123 degrees.

However, we know that Joshua Nowicki in his Chicago Skyline time lapse videos shows sometimes a drastic refraction even from a high vantage point of nearly 200 feet as I recall -- and while looking at a target that is a thousand feet tall.

Now it doesn't mean that the region of increased density gradient is all that thick over the water (Although it could be) - but the view of the distant skyline fits into a pretty narrow space at the point in the middle of the lake, so the rays of light between the target and the observer pass pretty close to the water in the middle.

And if the density gradient is enough, the light path can spend quite a bit more time in that region close to the water.

In my region, I don't see much in the way of strong refraction, but one time shooting a theodolite 6 ft above the water, the horizon was slightly above eye-level - which means I was actually getting a pretty strong refraction within 6ft of the water.
 

Cassi O

New Member
The above point is being discussed right now on a YouTube panel debate. From listening to them, it seems that it would really benefit to define "close" more specifically. One person thinks "close" means six inches but not six feet; another thinks six feet is "close". And there may be others who think twenty feet is "close".

I think it's not just how close the observer/camera is to the water, but also how many degrees the distant object is above the horizon. Nearly all the FE claims about seeing farther than the calculator predicts, are showing distant objects (islands, mountains, ships, buildings, etc..) that appear less than half a degree above the water. That's the region where the sun distorts and flattens out right before sunset. This produces photographic "proof", like the grainy Loch Ness Monster photo, that can be debated ad nauseam.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Rory Earth curve calculator for obstructions Tools for Investigating and Debunking 9
Mick West Earth's Radius Calculator (from the amount a distant object is obscured) Tools for Investigating and Debunking 0
Mick West Demonstrating the Curve of the Earth with observations of Beachy Head from Worthing Flat Earth 38
Qulaey Explained: 17.61 Mile Mirror Flash Supposedly Proves Flat Earth [Refraction] Flat Earth 5
T Observations of a Wind Farm Over the Curve of The Earth Flat Earth 0
Mick West Lasers vs. Flashlights vs. Daylight for Observing the Curve of the Earth Flat Earth 12
M Do Ibiza and Mallorca prove a Flat Earth? [No, they demonstrate the curve of the globe] Flat Earth 24
Mick West Detecting the Curve on Salt Flats and Salt Flat Lakes Flat Earth 1
C The difficulty of seeing the curve of the earth from 30,000 feet Flat Earth 11
Mick West Stand Up to Detect the Curve of the Earth Flat Earth 132
Swifty "Disc shaped" object in Antarctica on Google Earth UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
C Dodgy 'Earth curvature calculators' Flat Earth 4
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
Wiggles Measuring the radius of Earth using Long Range Observations (LROs) Flat Earth 0
Patrick Gonzalez Need help explaining: NASA images of Earth from 2017 eclipse show different shadow sizes Flat Earth 3
J Claim sun paths prove flat earth Flat Earth 41
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
J Are sun shadows only possible on a flat earth? Flat Earth 5
Mick West Satellite ADS-B Data in FlightAware24 - Blue Planes Prove Globe Earth Flat Earth 1
Mick West Flat Earth and Refraction with Oil Platforms Hillhouse and Habitat Flat Earth 5
Code-Beta 300 miles visibility on Antartica? Flat Earth 2
H Illusions of Curvature - RC Boat Hidden on Small Pond Flat Earth 10
M Bornong Flat Earth vs Oblate Spheroid: Earthquakes Flat Earth 3
J Does google earth pro simulate refraction [No] Flat Earth 7
Bunkmeister Cosmonaut Miroslaw Hermaczewski allegedly says earth is flat - [joke] Flat Earth 10
Mick West TFTRH #29 - Geoff: Everything is a Hoax, The Earth Might Be Flat Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 2
some_guy Dennis Danzik Earth Engine Perpetual Motion Science and Pseudoscience 2
H The German WWII "Knickebein" Navigation System and the Curvature of the Earth Flat Earth 11
Cassi O Google Maps Measure Distance Using Great Circle Flat Earth 0
Mick West TFTRH #14: Rory – Flat Earth Debunking and Spiritual Journeys Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 6
Wiggles Refraction Variations Over Water to Bell Island Flat Earth 27
mudr0 Why do spacesuit-wearing astronauts need blankets after returning to Earth? Science and Pseudoscience 5
Wiggles I could have spiralled into flat earth belief. Escaping The Rabbit Hole 36
Priyadi Islamic Rituals and Spherical Earth Flat Earth 0
O Convex Earth - Radio waves experiment Flat Earth 7
Mick West Why Flat Earth Laser Tests are Misleading Flat Earth 13
Mick West KML Tool For Visualizing Google Earth Cameras, and More Tools for Investigating and Debunking 5
Rory Calculator for viewing angles Tools for Investigating and Debunking 12
Rory Claim: footage of Great South Bay Bridge supports flat earth Flat Earth 11
Rory How can we explain perspective calculations simply? Flat Earth 39
chrono117 How to Debunk Flat Earth Without Relying on NASA or Photos Flat Earth 42
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Mendel Homemade Gyrocompass finds North by Spin Flat Earth 0
brad fuller Does the inverse-square law apply to the flat-earth debunking tool chest? Flat Earth 4
Z.W. Wolf Claim: Moon Passing The Meridian Disproves Globe Earth Flat Earth 0
LMR Bucka's Earth Rotation Experiment Flat Earth 38
Z.W. Wolf Claim: Seeing The Same Stars All Year Disproves Globe Earth Flat Earth 20
Rory Explained: How Mount Rainier helps demonstrate the shape of the globe Flat Earth 38
Rory Unidentified "space vehicle" Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 8
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top