You would sound some much saner and reasonable if you'd stop making those additional claims I just quoted. Almaz Antey put forward their theory and calculations for external review and submitted it to other experts on the case. Then they organized a press conference about their actions. They may have made big mistakes but it's entirely off topic to keep adding claims of intentional fakery, lie and conspiracy. That's all just speculation on why certain analysis might be mistaken. It's also speculation on possible motive. It doesn't belong in this discussion at all in my view.
Almaz-Antey just show 2 different versions of one thing - functional delay of detonation.
On first picture, radio-fuse activated as developed - on 20-30 degree to target, it is also first radiation pattern peak.
Detonation happen when signal continously raise with moving target to angle 80-90 degree (best peak of radiation pattern). Since missile fly from forward then this delay happen when signal have maximum amplitude (or reach certain value as function of summing previous signals) or signal raise become to fall (another check for prevent noise attack from target ECM). And warhead detonate will penetrate all vital area of plane (by wide beam of pellets).
On second picture Almaz-Antey trying play with unprepared minds and talk about LANCET under perpendicular to missile axis (dont present on 9N314 warhead). They trying to describe how lancet should penetrate plane in middle-rear area, instead of armored cabin. This is false info.
Another proof on wrong info about delay for penetrate tail instead of armored cabin is history of design 9N314 warhead. Old missile 9M38 had 9N130 warhead full of equal cuboids inside. But testing (and introducing close-support planes with armored elements, also adaptation 9M38 and 9M38M1 missile for naval use against ships) show not enough killing ability of these cuboids (we still see them in outer layer of 9N314). Then developers tried to fill warhead with bigger cuboids, but density of strike field fallen dramatically. Solution was found with X-shape fragments which was enough heavy and strong for penetrate armored targets (density of heavy pellets was enough since plane or ship is big target), filling by cuboids between X-shape + outer layer of cuboids dont lowering density against little targets like missiles (which very weak for even light pellets damage but need density more then density of heavy pellets). So, developers solve problem of armored targets by introducing 9N314 warhead with 3 pellets - X-shape (heavy in inner layer) and cuboids (light, in iner layer fill space between X-shape, and in outer layer). So question - why AA invent incredible lancet for penetrate armored parts, incredible delay for penetrate unarmored middle-tail, if engineers spent time for exchange only cuboids for cuboids + X-shape pellets? Reason? No reason, it fairytale.
Radio-fuse dont know where is cabin and where is tail. This parts is equal to him. Just raising power of signal. But on second picture power of signal falling down, so missile should think warhead will miss target. No delay in this cause, by any cost.
Collision of 2 pictures from Almaz-Antey clearly show how they trying to manipulate with facts - by moving after possible point of detonation in area where mythical lancet should work. They also want to show why missile from Z pass nose section of fuselage and only then detonate. Nothing to add, when you want 2+2=5...
All knowledge about non-directed radio-fuse and non-directed barrel-shaped warheads dont support falsyfied theory about lancet and passing target more then 90 degree angle to target before start detonate.
This is tricks with certain reason. No, engineers and scientist cannot forgot about vector addition and dynamic distribution of fragments or radiation pattern of radio-fuse. It like forgot digits or letters.
