Critical Thinker
Senior Member.
In the forums I have seen individuals argue their case using 'evidence' that has already been shown to be a load of hooey and also using logical fallacies (ie.. ad hominem attacks: "you are a disinformation agent!"). I have even seen some people hold the belief that Alex Jones actually believes the claims that he makes (I think he intentionally misleads others). I am curious how others make the distinction between when someone is simply mistaken versus when someone is intentionally making assertions they do not even believe in in an effort to mislead. Anyone care to share their thoughts?