This is bunk via headline. The idea that they are trying to convey is that that chemtrails are ongoing and the IPCC says we should not stop.
But that's flat wrong. The reality is that the IPCC is talking about possible Solar Radiation Management in the future, and that if we do start it, we would have to commit to continuing it for a long time, especially if there are not drastic reductions in carbon emissions. It's actually an argument against doing SRM in the future.
The headine comes from this article:
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/11/10/ipcc-warns-not-to-stop-chemtrails-aka-so
Where they seemingly deliberately conflate real programs that measure aerosol pollution with (non-existent) SRM programs
India does not such thing. They simple have programs that measure aerosol pollution.
Another version of the article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/solar-radiation-management-geoengineering-and-chemtrails/5356632
Which is also not true, the range of temperatures increased, the average temperature changed very little, and most of the effect is now thought to be due to the weather.
But that's flat wrong. The reality is that the IPCC is talking about possible Solar Radiation Management in the future, and that if we do start it, we would have to commit to continuing it for a long time, especially if there are not drastic reductions in carbon emissions. It's actually an argument against doing SRM in the future.
The headine comes from this article:
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/11/10/ipcc-warns-not-to-stop-chemtrails-aka-so
Where they seemingly deliberately conflate real programs that measure aerosol pollution with (non-existent) SRM programs
Another version of the article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/solar-radiation-management-geoengineering-and-chemtrails/5356632
Last edited: