Debunked: Air Force Verifies Chemtrails are Real

MikeG

Senior Member
429961main_cubesat_1.jpg
Did the U.S. Air Force just take a major step toward verifying that chemtrails are real?

Writing for Natural News on August 27, 2016, Samantha Debbie claimed that the:

http://www.naturalnews.com/055109_weather_modification_chemtrails_US_Air_Force.html

A closer look revealed that the program is experimental, involves methods and materials that have nothing to do with CT claims about chemtrails, and will occur at an altitude far above the altitude of normal contrails.

According to the actual Daily Mail story:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...al-plan-bomb-sky-improve-radio-reception.html

There are a few obvious things that don’t support the CT narrative about chemtrails:

1. The ionosphere is far, far above the altitude of normal contrails.

2. I am not a scientist, but it is pretty obvious that ionized gas is different than the usual elements –aluminum, barium, strontium—claimed to be part of chemtrails.

3. Air Force research has nothing to do with weather modification (again, back to altitude) or solar radiation management. The research addresses communications.

I thought the whole idea behind CubeSats was pretty interesting. It appears to be an improvement on HAARP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CubeSat

Here is a good article for future reference.
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...to-plasma-bomb-the-sky-using-tiny-satellites/
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I thought the whole idea behind CubeSats was pretty interesting. It appears to be an improvement on HAARP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CubeSat
Cubesats themselves are just a small form factor satellite, this is just one of many uses for cubesats.

I don't think "improvement on HAARP" is the right way of putting things, it's a radically different form of operation than HAARP.

But of course it's nothing at all like "Chemtrails", as it's in space. It's also a tiny thing compared to what has gone on in the past. Like in 1962, when they just used an atomic bomb.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
I don't think CubeSats are going to carry "massive amounts" of anything. The basic form factor is a 10cm cube of useful volume, ie one litre. You can bolt them together to make bigger satellites but the biggest ones launched to date have only consisted of six units.
 

MikeG

Senior Member
Cubesats themselves are just a small form factor satellite, this is just one of many uses for cubesats.

I don't think "improvement on HAARP" is the right way of putting things, it's a radically different form of operation than HAARP.

But of course it's nothing at all like "Chemtrails", as it's in space. It's also a tiny thing compared to what has gone on in the past. Like in 1962, when they just used an atomic bomb.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime
Starfish Prime reminds me of Operation Plowshare.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Plowshare

My reference to HAARP was prompted by a passage from the New Scientist article in the OP.

https://www.newscientist.com/articl...to-plasma-bomb-the-sky-using-tiny-satellites/

Even a reference to HAARP probably started the CT community chattering.

But, I'll offer my mea culpa about really understanding all the underlying science.

Having a historian talk about physics is like bringing a butter knife to a (plasma)gun fight.;)
 

Leifer

Senior Member
It can become another item in a gish...
...the gov't has done "this", so they must be doing "that".
 
Last edited:
Top