Avi Loeb announced to lead new "UAP Science Advisory Council" for White House

Well, unless they recovered the aliens pot plants at Roswell or wherever, I don't see how any variant of 'biologics' or whatever similar word is used can mean anything other than the aliens themselves. Its the classic ' we're not saying its aliens...but its aliens'.
My thought was that it provided some layer of safety if claims made under oath that SOUND like aliens do not, in fact, mean aliens. A recovered downed aircraft that had crashed after hitting a duck might be "advanced technology" and would have "non human biologics" smeared all over the point of impact, for example.

To my ear. the phrase "biologics" here is obfuscatory, whether intentionally so or not. The simplest way to say "we found an alien" is to say "we found an alien." Saying other stuff that merely implies aliens, to me, indicates they did not in fact find an alien but would like us to think they did.
 
My thought was that it provided some layer of safety if claims made under oath that SOUND like aliens do not, in fact, mean aliens. A recovered downed aircraft that had crashed after hitting a duck might be "advanced technology" and would have "non human biologics" smeared all over the point of impact, for example.

To my ear. the phrase "biologics" here is obfuscatory, whether intentionally so or not. The simplest way to say "we found an alien" is to say "we found an alien." Saying other stuff that merely implies aliens, to me, indicates they did not in fact find an alien but would like us to think they did.
"NHI" (Non human intelligence) is actually the "not aliens, but aliens!" word here I think.
 
My thought was that it provided some layer of safety if claims made under oath that SOUND like aliens do not, in fact, mean aliens. A recovered downed aircraft that had crashed after hitting a duck might be "advanced technology" and would have "non human biologics" smeared all over the point of impact, for example.

To my ear. the phrase "biologics" here is obfuscatory, whether intentionally so or not. The simplest way to say "we found an alien" is to say "we found an alien." Saying other stuff that merely implies aliens, to me, indicates they did not in fact find an alien but would like us to think they did.
It's deliberately obfuscatory - it comes with the easy out of "but we never said it was an alien" for a reason.
 
It's deliberately obfuscatory - it comes with the easy out of "but we never said it was an alien" for a reason.
Very deliberate.
Mr Grusch and others thought that their statements would open the flood-gates to a torrent of proof of aliens. Turns out there were only fuzzy dot photos behind those flood-gates. People are back-peddling, and trying to do it as quietly as possible.
 
Very deliberate.
Mr Grusch and others thought that their statements would open the flood-gates to a torrent of proof of aliens. Turns out there were only fuzzy dot photos behind those flood-gates. People are back-peddling, and trying to do it as quietly as possible.
Yeah obfuscatory but still pretty clear.
Like, we all know "non human biologics in recovered NHI crafts" is aliens.
No need to dance around it, but I don't think anyone actually did.
 
Aliens not being used at much is in my opinion a clever push while working with the DC blob because the term is used in existing laws regarding immigration. For example :
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/depa...sent-decree-kansas-enjoin-state-enforcing-its
The Department of Justice Reaches a Proposed Consent Decree with Kansas to Enjoin the State from Enforcing its Unconstitutional In-State Tuition and Scholarship Programs for Illegal Aliens
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien

So you one would not need to constantly clarify that it's not about Mexicans but rather Martians.
 
Back
Top